PDA

View Full Version : Wily English Commentators rubbing it on Indians


Aly
31st July 2011, 15:49
David bumble Loyd adding insult to Indian injury by telling them as to how most of the commies at sky thought that it was a sarcastic act by English team when they were clapping for the Indians and that Athers had gone mad on Indians by maintaining that bell was dead out

May be Shastri is not wrong after all when he says that he is totally sure that this decision would never be reciprocated by the English team

Your responses?

StraightHit
31st July 2011, 16:21
Its all hypothetical. Can't be sure about what the English team would have done, but the following is just my opinion.

If you look at past precedents, Collingwood did not recall NZ batsman Elliot for the run out, even after he was asked by the on on field umpire.

When it comes to Strauss, he did not allow an injured Smith a runner.

High chances are that England would have not recalled the batter.

Poison
31st July 2011, 16:22
You're a nutter Aly

Sandeep99
31st July 2011, 16:32
I'm sure the English would never have behaved like what India did...and one more,,Dhoni would have never begged the opposition to overturn the decision for sure...

IgnitedMind
31st July 2011, 16:35
now that sportsmanship arguement against india is thrown out of the window..you guys start this!!

Aly
31st July 2011, 16:48
You're a nutter Aly

No bro it's just that I really feel for Indians this time around :)

Minku
31st July 2011, 16:58
David bumble Loyd adding insult to Indian injury by telling them as to how most of the commies at sky thought that it was a sarcastic act by English team when they were clapping for the Indians and that Athers had gone mad on Indians by maintaining that bell was dead out

May be Shastri is not wrong after all when he says that he is totally sure that this decision would never be reciprocated by the English team

Your responses?

Either ur trolling or u cant comprehend english language...
. I was listening to the commentary at that moment as well.. and what bumble said was that The Sky commentators thought, English team was clapping sarcastically for the Indian team when they came back from Tea But after Bell arrived to the field they understood why they were clapping It was coz they were showing there appreciation for Dhoni's decision for calling Bell back, which English team already knew during the tea break...

and ur second quote is even more stupid.. He was saying the Atherthon thought Bell was dumb to just walk away from the crease and he should have been given out for his stupidity..

EITHER STOP TROLLING OR GO BACK TO SCHOOL AND LEARN SOME ENGLISH

Aly
31st July 2011, 17:09
Either ur trolling or u cant comprehend english language...
. I was listening to the commentary at that moment as well.. and what bumble said was that The Sky commentators thought, English team was clapping sarcastically for the Indian team when they came back from Tea But after Bell arrived to the field they understood why they were clapping It was coz they were showing there appreciation for Dhoni's decision for calling Bell back, which English team already knew during the tea break...

and ur second quote is even more stupid.. He was saying the Atherthon thought Bell was dumb to just walk away from the crease and he should have been given out for his stupidity..

EITHER STOP TROLLING OR GO BACK TO SCHOOL AND LEARN SOME ENGLISH

Or rather we should all send Ravi the Ranter to mental hospital instead :)

shan
31st July 2011, 17:13
I only have problem with the pathetic crowd, started boing Indians for no reason at all.

Bell was out and he knew it and Morgan also thats why he didnt leave his crease. Bunch of cheats and cry babies if you ask me and there is no way they had done the same if role were reversed.

Arcturus
31st July 2011, 17:25
I only have problem with the pathetic crowd, started boing Indians for no reason at all.

Bell was out and he knew it and Morgan also thats why he didnt leave his crease. Bunch of cheats and cry babies if you ask me and there is no way they had done the same if role were reversed.

Can't say the crowd is to be blamed here. Would've been much worse in the sub-continent IMO.

And yes I seriously doubt the english would've done the same.

AlizeeFan
31st July 2011, 17:38
Can't say the crowd is to be blamed here. Would've been much worse in the sub-continent IMO.

And yes I seriously doubt the english would've done the same.

Yeah, crowd can't be blamed. Anyone sitting there would have been disappointed by the decision.

People watching the match in the ground generally don't have the luxury of listening to opinions or understanding what exactly happened.

shan
31st July 2011, 17:45
Can't say the crowd is to be blamed here. Would've been much worse in the sub-continent IMO.

And yes I seriously doubt the english would've done the same.

Yes by Indian standard maybe not because last time we all know how they behaved in Kolkatta when Sachin was run out back in 99. They had to finish the game in empty stadium. But generally i dont think crowds in Pakistan and Sri Lanka boo anyone. I have yet to see it anyway live in last 10 years of watching cricket.

But Bell the retard was out and once he knew he cant get back, started walking like it was over and tea. Shamefull stuff really, Morgan knew it and thats why he didnt move a inch.

alberto
31st July 2011, 17:51
the same thing happened with pietersen against asif last year when he shaped to say he wss not ready and hit the ball and was caught out. ironicallly that moment was shown 2 hours before bell's controversial moment

Ambi
31st July 2011, 18:55
Its all hypothetical. Can't be sure about what the English team would have done, but the following is just my opinion.

If you look at past precedents, Collingwood did not recall NZ batsman Elliot for the run out, even after he was asked by the on on field umpire.

When it comes to Strauss, he did not allow an injured Smith a runner.

High chances are that England would have not recalled the batter.

good post