PDA

View Full Version : Pak V Eng: ODI No 1: Lahore: Score updates and discussion thread (Eng innings)


Pages : 1 [2] 3

The_Cricket_Devil
10th December 2005, 06:24
"What does hotel waiter know? last time 300+ was scored on this pitch was in 1998."


Was it?

did Pakistan and India amassed over 700+ runs in the last ODI they played there? in 2004?

i think that is karachi you are talking about the odi they played in lahore in 2 004 india made 293 and beat pakistan

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 06:24
well done sami for making breakthru.

smoothcriminal
10th December 2005, 06:25
It was a quick full toss, was looking for the yorker Prior didnt expect it at all and was plumb. He was absoultely livid, couldnt believe it!


oh, thought he was blaming it on sight screen.

MIG
10th December 2005, 06:26
Like I said:

SpecSavers new poster boys : Vaughan and Prior :))

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 06:27
loud appeal for lbw. hair doesnt even bother looking at razzaq.

Bailan
10th December 2005, 06:27
karachi


Fair enough

smoothcriminal
10th December 2005, 06:27
oooo.. that was pretty close. I can see the darell hair bashers coming in

iZeeshan
10th December 2005, 06:27
out!!!! not such a great delivery...slipped out of sami's hands...prior lost control and ended up being a gr8 delievery!

offstump
10th December 2005, 06:27
*** that looked out to me

team-pak
10th December 2005, 06:28
Ramiz bhai upto his old tricks.

Ramiz: "good time for Razzaq to bowl at a new batsman"

after two balls

Ramiz: "good time for Pietersen to come in against a medium pacer"

lol!

Raz
10th December 2005, 06:28
loud appeal for lbw. hair doesnt even bother looking at razzaq.

That looked out to me! Was never going to be given with Hair as the umpire!

Big Mac
10th December 2005, 06:28
Good decision looking at the replays, thought it was out when I saw it live

Bailan
10th December 2005, 06:28
Chalo Ji .... Add another one to Sad umpiring ...

iZeeshan
10th December 2005, 06:29
tht shud have been out....height wuz a bit confusing...but no doubt wud hav hit stumps but batsman SHUD get benefit of doubt

smoothcriminal
10th December 2005, 06:29
actually to be fair to HAIR it was a good decision

iZeeshan
10th December 2005, 06:30
what do yall say...i think shoaib akhtar shud be brought in now for like 2 overs for some torube

smoothcriminal
10th December 2005, 06:30
Maybe later, right now i dont think shoaib would be that effective.

Bailan
10th December 2005, 06:30
Today's Conclusion:

Women must never use Face paints .... well atleast not Ultra Dark ones ... and if they do ... then the camera man avoid them at all costs

Raz
10th December 2005, 06:30
Strauss gets a bottom edge and still lucky to be there.

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 06:30
Pieterson off mark.

Eng 99/2

smoothcriminal
10th December 2005, 06:31
Today's Conclusion:

Women must never use Face paints .... well atleast not Ultra Dark ones ... and if they do ... then the camera man avoid them at all costs

lol, who can forget our real national sport, poondi :p

from_da_lost_dim3nsion
10th December 2005, 06:32
lol, who can forget our real national sport, poondi :p

sometimes i feel that i m left out heer at pakpasion coz' i dun understand what ppl are talkin abt .. ::J ::J

Jonty
10th December 2005, 06:33
hey guys! how was shoaib bowling?

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 06:33
england 100-2.

team-pak
10th December 2005, 06:33
sometimes i feel that i m left out heer at pakpasion coz' i dun understand what ppl are talkin abt .. ::J ::J

maybe time for you to change dimensions? ;-)

smoothcriminal
10th December 2005, 06:34
sometimes i feel that i m left out heer at pakpasion coz' i dun understand what ppl are talkin abt .. ::J ::J

lol dude its what most pakistani guys do, just check out hot desi chicks.

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 06:34
Today's Conclusion:

Women must never use Face paints .... well atleast not Ultra Dark ones ... and if they do ... then the camera man avoid them at all costs

whatever happened to imagination? ;-)

Hussain
10th December 2005, 06:34
98/2

team-pak
10th December 2005, 06:35
lol dude its what most pakistani guys do, just check out hot desi chicks.

please dont restrict my demographic! :19:

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 06:35
Eng 103/2 (20)

Nauman
10th December 2005, 06:35
hey guys! how was shoaib bowling?

Not good.

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 06:35
103-2 20 overs gone.

from_da_lost_dim3nsion
10th December 2005, 06:35
lol dude its what most pakistani guys do, just check out hot desi chicks.


lol !! cool !!]
NATIONAL SPORT IT IS :D

badxhah
10th December 2005, 06:35
abe yaar i m stuck to watch Nzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz vs Ozzies match
wth wid cbn

PapaBear
10th December 2005, 06:36
That doesnt mean we should field like minnows!

Bailan
10th December 2005, 06:36
whatever happened to imagination? ;-)


If men were actually good at that ... women would have never needed Make up

Nauman
10th December 2005, 06:36
103-2 20 overs gone.

Well run rate of 5 an over, could have been worse.

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 06:37
superb fielding by razzaq on boundary!

Bailan
10th December 2005, 06:37
Spinner TiME

smoothcriminal
10th December 2005, 06:38
haha the spinach jokes are here.

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 06:38
more runs for strauss.

eng 110/2

team-pak
10th December 2005, 06:38
another gem from Ramiz.

"I dont understand the logic here. You have got to get two of your better fielders at mid-on and mid-off...if the batsmen are keen to pick up singles in that area"

I have a feeling the batsmen are keen to pick up singles in any area!

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 06:39
Eng 112/2 (21)

badxhah
10th December 2005, 06:39
indian pacer Srinath giving a detail description of reverse swing (Ind vs SL)

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 06:40
If men were actually good at that ... women would have never needed Make up

lagaya to tha usne makeup. :))

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 06:40
112-2 21overs

Bailan
10th December 2005, 06:40
Ramiz has used his greatest gem only once so far ... i am so surprised ... 'Even Stevens'

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 06:41
Well run rate of 5 an over, could have been worse.

even though fielding has been below par and we gave some extras, england couldnt take much advantage of the powerplays. some good bowling by sami also.

Bailan
10th December 2005, 06:41
lagaya to tha usne makeup. :))

:))) :))

PapaBear
10th December 2005, 06:41
Razzaq is containing them well.

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 06:41
good ball from razzaq beats pieterson.

Nauman
10th December 2005, 06:42
112/6 in 22 overs.

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 06:42
indian pacer Srinath giving a detail description of reverse swing (Ind vs SL)

Srinath doing a Botham :)) :))

smoothcriminal
10th December 2005, 06:42
hot Lahori chicks watching cricket match is as hot as it gets for me hah

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 06:43
Eng 115/3 (22)

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 06:44
Kaneria on now to bowl.

Mutazalzaluzzaman Tarar
10th December 2005, 06:44
another gem from Ramiz.

"I dont understand the logic here. You have got to get two of your better fielders at mid-on and mid-off...if the batsmen are keen to pick up singles in that area"

I have a feeling the batsmen are keen to pick up singles in any area!

please don't blame Rameez for your lack of understanding of the game. what Rameez said makes perfect sense within the appropriate context. just because a couple of idiots make fun of Rameez all the time doesn't mean that everyone has to jump on him everytime he says something.

here's an interesting tidbit you might not be aware of: he gets paid to air his opinions and you not only do NOT get paid, you also pay part of Rameez's salary. hope that puts everything in context for you. cheerios...

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 06:44
should be interesting now how chickenboy plays.

zushy_786
10th December 2005, 06:44
112/6 in 22 overs.

Hein what match are you watching :20:

pacman
10th December 2005, 06:44
that blows man, i'm sorry.

Wow, I just got my ARY signal back. About time. Still furious though. I spent 10£ on cricketon.tv to watch it through them.

badxhah
10th December 2005, 06:44
Srinath doing a Botham :)) :))
Yea Srinath DOIN A BIT OF BOTHAM

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 06:45
Lets see how long till pieterson plays slog sweep!

Nauman
10th December 2005, 06:46
Hein what match are you watching :20:

lol I meant 2.

Mutazalzaluzzaman Tarar
10th December 2005, 06:46
Lets see how long till pieterson plays slog sweep!

is Asim Kamal playing, Amjid?

ammarz
10th December 2005, 06:46
Razzak seems to be getting in a good rhythm. and also seems to be bowling at a good clip around 80-85mph. good news for us hopefully he can pick up a wicket as well

zushy_786
10th December 2005, 06:46
lol I meant 2.

:))) :)))

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 06:48
Eng 120/2

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 06:48
quick singles being taken. not good.

Nauman
10th December 2005, 06:48
120/2 now

God this English team is full of cheats, what is the whole point of Pieterson showing his bat to the umpire when it was no way near his bat.

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 06:49
Pakistans ground fielding has been poor thus far.

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 06:50
Pieterson flicks razzaqs last ball off over for 4.

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 06:50
120/2 now

God this English team is full of cheats, what is the whole point of Pieterson showing his bat to the umpire when it was no way near his bat.

thats normal i think.

Nauman
10th December 2005, 06:50
Pakistans ground fielding has been poor thus far.

Thats an understatement

team-pak
10th December 2005, 06:50
please don't blame Rameez for your lack of understanding of the game. what Rameez said makes perfect sense within the appropriate context. just because a couple of idiots make fun of Rameez all the time doesn't mean that everyone has to jump on him everytime he says something.

here's an interesting tidbit you might not be aware of: he gets paid to air his opinions and you not only do NOT get paid, you also pay part of Rameez's salary. hope that puts everything in context for you. cheerios...

hmmm...not really yaar. why dont you keep your cheerios for when youre hungry. and while you munch on them, why dont you explain to me why it makes sense to keep your best two fielders at mid-on and mid-off. :D

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 06:51
125-2 RR:5.21 overrate:13/hour

zushy_786
10th December 2005, 06:51
Thats an understatement

Great here comes the negative brigade again choo choo :31:

Mutazalzaluzzaman Tarar
10th December 2005, 06:51
Pakistans ground fielding has been poor thus far.

we wouldn't have had this problem if Asim Kamal were playing. if only...

but cricket experts like you and I can only wince in pain as we watch these amateurs run our cricket team.

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 06:52
that was a ripper from danish. sharp turn.

Bailan
10th December 2005, 06:53
Something should be done about these singles ... its almost as if inzi is happy with them

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 06:53
i can hear a dog barking. hopefully someone will muzzle it!

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 06:53
Eng 131/2

strauss gets his 50.

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 06:53
strauss gets his 50. 131-2

zushy_786
10th December 2005, 06:53
i can hear a dog barking. hopefully someone will muzzle it!

How about the dog gets shown your 1,000,000,000 posts maybe then.....

Nauman
10th December 2005, 06:54
131/2 in 25 overs.

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 06:54
Superb shot for pieterson. slams ball over legside for 4.

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 06:54
run rate is not that high, but singles have to be plugged. make them take risks.

Bailan
10th December 2005, 06:55
we wouldn't have had this problem if Asim Kamal were playing. if only...

but cricket experts like you and I can only wince in pain as we watch these amateurs run our cricket team.


There is a reason to why they play and not you and I ... there are certain expectations off of any JOB and if you fail to that properly you are bound to be critisized and time that you accept that their job is cricket and if they fail to meet the minimum standards their customers ( that is their fans) will point fingers at them

Mutazalzaluzzaman Tarar
10th December 2005, 06:55
hmmm...not really yaar. why dont you keep your cheerios for when youre hungry. and while you munch on them, why dont you explain to me why it makes sense to keep your best two fielders at mid-on and mid-off. :D

really you don't know? why were you taking cheap shots at Rameez's comments then? isn't it better to just ask someone if you don't know?

either way, send me a PM and I'll explain it to you in detail with pictures and all. till then lay off Rameez.

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 06:56
another quick single :12: :12:

ataullah
10th December 2005, 06:56
Decent start by kaneria but we need to get pietersen and flintoff

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 06:57
pieterson slams another razzaq ball over legside for 4.

Bailan
10th December 2005, 06:57
really you don't know? why were you taking cheap shots at Rameez's comments then? isn't it better to just ask someone if you don't know?

either way, send me a PM and I'll explain it to you in detail with pictures and all. till then lay off Rameez.


May be the problem is that we have all heard better commentry, say the days between 1992 and 1999 ... and when Ramiz & Co. fail to meet our standards then we reserve the right to critisize.

As I said, if you are not doing your job exceptionally well, there will always be fingers and let me point them ... all 10 of them!

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 06:57
Eng 141/2 (26)

plenty of batting to come still....

Bailan
10th December 2005, 06:58
Where is my Long-on and Long-off?

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 06:58
10 off the over. 141-2.

Mutazalzaluzzaman Tarar
10th December 2005, 06:58
There is a reason to why they play and not you and I ... there are certain expectations off of any JOB and if you fail to that properly you are bound to be critisized and time that you accept that their job is cricket and if they fail to meet the minimum standards their customers ( that is their fans) will point fingers at them

exactly.. and I completely agree. where did I disagree with any of that?

all I said is that I think Amjid and I could do a better job than Woolmer and Inzi. I mean look at our combined post count for goodness sake. nearly 40k posts filled with cricketing goodness. if that doesn't qualify us for team management then I don't know what does.

Nauman
10th December 2005, 06:58
So much so for Razzaq's rhythm.

zushy_786
10th December 2005, 06:58
Where is my Long-on and Long-off?

In a biryani eating contest I'm afraid....

Bailan
10th December 2005, 06:59
exactly.. and I completely agree. where did I disagree with any of that?

all I said is that I think Amjid and I could do a better job than Woolmer and Inzi. I mean look at our combined post count for goodness sake. nearly 40k posts filled with cricketing goodness. if that doesn't qualify us for team management then I don't know what does.

Fair enough .... i guess, I took some of those actual comments as 'sarcasm' ... my bad

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 06:59
50 partnership up off 57 balls!

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 07:00
6 off danish.. monster hit.

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:00
Lets see how long till pieterson plays slog sweep!

two sixes in a row! :12:

Bailan
10th December 2005, 07:00
SIX .... so what ? only a matter of time before he sky's one

MIG
10th December 2005, 07:00
May be the problem is that we have all heard better commentry, say the days between 1992 and 1999 ... and when Ramiz & Co. fail to meet our standards then we reserve the right to critisize.

As I said, if you are not doing your job exceptionally well, there will always be fingers and let me point them ... all 10 of them!

Challo , challo larro naheen - save the real nasty stuff when England cross 300 - phir PP pay mood bilkul kharab hojayaga!!

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 07:00
another over midwicket for 6. chickenboy firingup now

smoothcriminal
10th December 2005, 07:01
oh boy

team-pak
10th December 2005, 07:01
really you don't know? why were you taking cheap shots at Rameez's comments then? isn't it better to just ask someone if you don't know?

either way, send me a PM and I'll explain it to you in detail with pictures and all. till then lay off Rameez.

yaar Ramiz tumhara taya lagta hay? I didnt take a cheap shot at anyone. I called Ramiz's comment for the trash it was.

if you know the "logic" behind keeping your best fielders at mid-off and mid-on why dont you just tell us? you dont have to write a book on the topic you know! ;-)

Big Mac
10th December 2005, 07:01
England have to be aiming for close to 350 here. We've looked crap today so far

Nauman
10th December 2005, 07:01
Pathetic bowling, I am off now, Ill wait for Pakistan's turn with the bat, hopefully they can put up a better display with the bat.

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:02
malik on now. shout for lbw!

was fkin plumb!

smoothcriminal
10th December 2005, 07:03
oh man in pakistani pitches you are bound to get beaten like this.

Bailan
10th December 2005, 07:03
back to 14 vs. 12 game

offstump
10th December 2005, 07:03
damn you hair, damn you again

smoothcriminal
10th December 2005, 07:03
lucky escape peterson

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 07:03
was that out? didnt see any bat hit the ball.. bumble defending the umpire immediately.

Big Mac
10th December 2005, 07:03
oh man that is PLUMB

offstump
10th December 2005, 07:03
malik changed his #, used to be 18

KaSaNoVa_G
10th December 2005, 07:03
only Hair could give it not out...

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:04
four more for pieterson. hes been allowed to free his arms to much!

MIG
10th December 2005, 07:04
malik changed his #, used to be 18

That must be the reason why his action is now clean.

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:05
4 more for pieterson.

eng 169/2

Raz
10th December 2005, 07:05
It was plumb but there was doubt there as the bat hit the ground giving the impression that there were two noises, like an inside edge onto the pad. Element of doubt there and rightly given to the batsman.

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:05
akthar back on now

Bailan
10th December 2005, 07:05
Why do comentrators always try to defend the umpires that they have only one chance at full speed?

I mean ... the hell they are umpires not your local 'sabzi wala' their job is to do the Umpiring and do it well ...

and if they are too slow to see the ball then they shouldn't complain about introduction of Technology.

There is a very good reason why ICC dosen't let technology well ... simpley because the Whites will start loosing to technology all of a sudden.

smoothcriminal
10th December 2005, 07:05
need to bring on a change, sami would not be bad... but shoaib would be ideal

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 07:05
another hit over midwicket for 4. pieterson freeing his arms

smoothcriminal
10th December 2005, 07:06
Ayee Gaa,, Aye Gaa Aanay Waaala, Ayee Gaaa

deadly_man
10th December 2005, 07:06
If aneria is going for lot of run he can be replaced by arshad...I hope that since pak is bowling first inzi didnt forget that he has a bowler as a supersub

Raz
10th December 2005, 07:06
Shoaib brought on, good move

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:06
partnership 75 off 66 balls now

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 07:06
shoaib on now.. a wicket InshaAllah.

team-pak
10th December 2005, 07:07
yaar Ramiz tumhara taya lagta hay? I didnt take a cheap shot at anyone. I called Ramiz's comment for the trash it was.

if you know the "logic" behind keeping your best fielders at mid-off and mid-on why dont you just tell us? you dont have to write a book on the topic you know! ;-)

chup ho gaye ho tarar bhai. bolti band? :) time to put some cricketing knowledge behind the big mouth!

desidude
10th December 2005, 07:07
Okay...I think Pakistan is going down in this first match. If they dont take Petersion out he is going to take this game away from Pakistan.

lakha84
10th December 2005, 07:07
thats was pout by malik 1st ball

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:08
4 down ground and 50 for pieterson

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 07:08
50 for pieterson. well played

desidude
10th December 2005, 07:08
Great knock by Kevin. A wonderful innings.

Mutazalzaluzzaman Tarar
10th December 2005, 07:09
yaar Ramiz tumhara taya lagta hay? I didnt take a cheap shot at anyone. I called Ramiz's comment for the trash it was.

is too much to give someone some respect regardless of whether he is related to me or not?

come back and do that when you've played international cricket, captained your country's cricket team, been the CE of the PCB among other things. granted posting on an internet forum is a great accomplishment for you, somehow the real world doesn't quite perceive it the same way.

think hard and you'll figure out why you need your best fielders in the circle when you want to cut off singles. hint: it has to do with how good looking those fielders are.

desidude
10th December 2005, 07:09
Another fast 100 by KP on the cards????

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:10
flintoff, g jones, solanki, blackwell all to come interms of big hitters!

Mutazalzaluzzaman Tarar
10th December 2005, 07:10
chup ho gaye ho tarar bhai. bolti band? :) time to put some cricketing knowledge behind the big mouth!

some of us think before we post. so, not all us suffer from verbal diarrhea.

desidude
10th December 2005, 07:11
Pakistan's fielding is pathetic today. Inzi and Kaneria cant even hold a ball in their hands.... Razzak look totally out of sorts. And England has a huge huge batting line up today. I think 7 match winning spree comes to an end in this match.

Raz
10th December 2005, 07:11
Allot really starting to boast about England's chances

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:11
12 runs off the over.

eng 181/2 (29)

Raz
10th December 2005, 07:12
Top edge goes for 4! Shoaib unlucky and having words with KP.

team-pak
10th December 2005, 07:12
think hard and you'll figure out why you need your best fielders in the circle when you want to cut off singles.

hmmm...didnt realize mid-off and mid-on were the only positions in the circle. well done yaar. you must be related to Ramiz! :19:

MIG
10th December 2005, 07:12
some of us think before we post. so, not all us suffer from verbal diarrhea.

MT - Can we pls ask you to calm down now ?

desidude
10th December 2005, 07:12
Exchange of words between KV and Shoaib Akhtar after he hit him another 4 on the last ball. I dont know what exactly they said but shoaib doesnt look too happy.

Raz
10th December 2005, 07:13
93% of runs have come on the leg side from Pieterson.

smoothcriminal
10th December 2005, 07:13
peterson's really on song today

Hussain
10th December 2005, 07:13
we might have to chase another 350

seeing the depth in English batting

Big Mac
10th December 2005, 07:13
What an awesome stumping

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:13
Pieterson gone stumped!

well done malik!

smoothcriminal
10th December 2005, 07:14
Or Not!

team-pak
10th December 2005, 07:14
some of us think before we post. so, not all us suffer from verbal diarrhea.

its tough to remain calm when you can't back up your words with logic isnt it? koi nahee bhai, hota hay. :)

pacman
10th December 2005, 07:14
Good stumping by Akmal. England looking good though at this stage.

desidude
10th December 2005, 07:15
KV goneeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

KaSaNoVa_G
10th December 2005, 07:15
OUTTTTTTT

great stumping by the lil keeper... we really needed a wicket now.. and that of him too..

ataullah
10th December 2005, 07:15
outttttttttttttttttt

iZeeshan
10th December 2005, 07:15
great stumping...out!

Raz
10th December 2005, 07:15
Pieterson gone!!! Clever bowling from Malik and smartly stumped by Kami.

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:15
flintoff in now.

Eng 185/3 (29.4)

desidude
10th December 2005, 07:15
What an innings. He is simply turning out another Afridi.

badxhah
10th December 2005, 07:15
WOW Majority of the last few pages have been on fighting b.w foruumers ON RAMEEZ

pacman
10th December 2005, 07:16
It was signalled wide by Hair. I was wondering, can a batsman be given out if he is stumped on a noball?

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:17
Kaneria back now

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 07:17
akmal just said "well done dani.. malik" :)))

team-pak
10th December 2005, 07:17
It was signalled wide by Hair. I was wondering, can a batsman be given out if he is stumped on a noball?

nope!

MIG
10th December 2005, 07:17
WOW Majority of the last few pages have been on fighting b.w foruumers ON RAMEEZ

Wanna fight with me huh ?

Raz
10th December 2005, 07:17
Pieterson in the end paid for getting too cocky. He aint no Afridi and that was a subtle reminder for him.

smoothcriminal
10th December 2005, 07:17
It was signalled wide by Hair. I was wondering, can a batsman be given out if he is stumped on a noball?

neup

zushy_786
10th December 2005, 07:17
Wanna fight with me huh ?

:))) :)))

Bailan
10th December 2005, 07:17
Regarding the Rules


Say if Kaneria has Bowled his 10 overs .... can we bring in Arshad Khan?

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 07:17
186-3

MIG
10th December 2005, 07:17
Pieterson in the end paid for getting too cocky. He aint no Afridi and that was a subtle reminder for him.

But nuqsaan kar gaya !

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:18
It was signalled wide by Hair. I was wondering, can a batsman be given out if he is stumped on a noball?

NO! u can only be run out off a NO-ball.

team-pak
10th December 2005, 07:18
Kanny boy showing he isnt an ODI bowler. atleast not on such a short ground!

iZeeshan
10th December 2005, 07:19
u cant be out on no ball...wide yes

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:19
eng 190/3 from 31 overs.

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 07:19
5 singles in the over.
190-3

Bailan
10th December 2005, 07:20
so can we bring in arshad in place of kaneria?

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 07:20
isnt stumping similiar to a run out? maybe it should be out

pacman
10th December 2005, 07:21
nope!

But you can be runout, why not stumped? The batsman is out of his crease.

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 07:22
194-3. 32 overs bowled. Drinks break

Raz
10th December 2005, 07:22
But nuqsaan kar gaya !

Inshallah jab Pakistan jeetay ga to nuqsaan bee bhool jayen ge.

badxhah
10th December 2005, 07:22
Wanna fight with me huh ?


Sir App Lassi Pee kar aye hai .. Meinaay abhi Jam toast Kahaye sirf ;;;;

Kisi or Din Miggy Bahi ;-)

team-pak
10th December 2005, 07:23
But you can be runout, why not stumped? The batsman is out of his crease.

runout belongs to the fielder. stumping goes to the bowler who bowled it illegally.

MIG
10th December 2005, 07:24
Sir App Lassi Pee kar aye hai .. Meinaay abhi Jam toast Kahaye sirf ;;;;

Kisi or Din Miggy Bahi ;-)

You can run but you cant hide ....

Imy
10th December 2005, 07:24
You can be stumped off a no ball, you cant be caught, bowled or lbw of a no ball

studentsbiryani
10th December 2005, 07:24
ludoo shudoo, birayni shiryani?

zushy_786
10th December 2005, 07:24
You can run but you cant hide ....

What's your address :))

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:25
england picking up the ones here..

eng 196/3

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:25
Flintoff hit plumb infront and not given!

Jonty
10th December 2005, 07:26
disappointing to see kaneria in the ODI lineup

deadly_man
10th December 2005, 07:26
isnt stumping similiar to a run out? maybe it should be out
yaly it is out
are u seeing first time stumping on a wide ball.
salain and tendulakar used to do it a lot wheever batsman comes out of crease early they just send wide ball for stumping

studentsbiryani
10th December 2005, 07:27
***** billay doing what they do best, cheating

pacman
10th December 2005, 07:27
runout belongs to the fielder. stumping goes to the bowler who bowled it illegally.

Yes, I understand. But it must be a tricky situation. Cause a keeper can claim the wicket as a runout. The wicket should go to the keeper then :13:

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:28
Eng 200/3 (34)

16 overs to go..

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:29
superb fielding by sami on boundary.

Rob H
10th December 2005, 07:29
Very encouraging so far. Unless we have a major collapse we'll get 300. Blackwell, Flintoff, Gojo, Collingwood can all smash it miles. As i speak some good fielding by Sami and 2 more the Strauss. 202-3

Jonty
10th December 2005, 07:29
wickets are required otherwise 350 on th cards. Doesnt look good!

Big Mac
10th December 2005, 07:29
Nice bit of fielding on the boundary

Hussain
10th December 2005, 07:30
Regarding the Rules


Say if Kaneria has Bowled his 10 overs .... can we bring in Arshad Khan?


yes you can always substitute Kaneria with Arshad

but he wont be allowed to bowl if Kaneria already has been bowled out

deadly_man
10th December 2005, 07:30
You can be stumped off a no ball, you cant be caught, bowled or lbw of a no ball
it was a wide ball not no ball.
I am not sure whether u can be stumped on a no ball..I ghuess not

Rob H
10th December 2005, 07:30
predicted total for Eng? For it's gonna be 307-7

Bailan
10th December 2005, 07:31
yes you can always substitute Kaneria with Arshad

but he wont be allowed to bowl if Kaneria already has been bowled out


What if the replacement is after 9 Kaneria overs?

Rob H
10th December 2005, 07:31
dropped it :D

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:32
unlucky. malik almost clean bowls strauss.

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:32
What if the replacement is after 9 Kaneria overs?

arshad can then only bowl 1 over.

iZeeshan
10th December 2005, 07:32
pak in troube...we need wickets!~

studentsbiryani
10th December 2005, 07:33
predicted total for Eng? For it's gonna be 307-7
if pak dont reverse, then at least 320 is on the cards

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:33
RS by strauss and gets 4.

Rob H
10th December 2005, 07:33
Reverse sweep for 4. SHOT!

Big Mac
10th December 2005, 07:33
haha, what a great reverse sweep

Bailan
10th December 2005, 07:33
what a write off a rule this is then .... always making it a 12 against 11 game

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 07:33
yaly it is out
are u seeing first time stumping on a wide ball.
salain and tendulakar used to do it a lot wheever batsman comes out of crease early they just send wide ball for stumping

you took it off context. my query was regarding to a stumping off a no-ball.

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:33
Eng 212/3 (36)

offstump
10th December 2005, 07:34
our bowlers aint doing nothing, england are goona post a massive total at this rate

zushy_786
10th December 2005, 07:34
Reverse sweep for 4. SHOT!

So RH where were you during test series....Showing your true colours coming when england are supposedly doing well.....

team-pak
10th December 2005, 07:34
Reverse sweep for 4. SHOT!

what would you guys do if the umps werent on your side? :D

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:35
joke fielding by butt in outfield.

eng 215/3

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:35
So RH where were you during test series....Showing your true colours coming when england are supposedly doing well.....

:)) hes abit like ian botham.

MIG
10th December 2005, 07:36
The Swings and Roundabouts rule states clearly that Hair will not give Clean bowleds out in Pak innings - yep it all equals out in the end....

zushy_786
10th December 2005, 07:36
:)) hes abit like ian botham.

:))) Really shows what kind of chameleon kind of fan RH is....

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 07:36
pakistan ko fielding aur noballs lay doobaien gi.

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:37
Eng 222/3

Rob H
10th December 2005, 07:37
wide

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 07:37
The Swings and Roundabouts rule states clearly that Hair will not give Clean bowleds out in Pak innings - yep it all equals out in the end....

the lassi has filled you with optimism. :10:

Daoud
10th December 2005, 07:37
The Swings and Roundabouts rule states clearly that Hair will not give Clean bowleds out in Pak innings - yep it all equals out in the end....
I think the swing and roundabout rule will cause Hair to give contentious decisions in the second innings, and when asked about it, he'll say he gave 2 or 3 decisions that were out, not out, then 2 or 3 decisions that were not out, out. In the long run, they evened out

deadly_man
10th December 2005, 07:38
you took it off context. my query was regarding to a stumping off a no-ball.
for no ball I think its not out because its an illigal delivery.
and there is a clear difference between stumping and run out as some people were saying that keeper can claim it to be a run out

hatch101
10th December 2005, 07:38
Pak doesn't look too good at this time! I hope the Pak batsmen do something!

Raz
10th December 2005, 07:38
A fan had a sign up saying they miss Afridi and they are not the only one!!

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:39
4 for strauss.

Rob H
10th December 2005, 07:39
So RH where were you during test series....Showing your true colours coming when england are supposedly doing well.....
Check the threads! On the days when Eng played on the weekends i was on (bar the last saturday). Check yourself!

4 more btw

MIG
10th December 2005, 07:39
:))) Really shows what kind of chameleon kind of fan RH is....


RH is protected by the Mods as part of the UN human rights convention - he is not to be made fun of (unless if he mentions any word with prefix reverse )

deadly_man
10th December 2005, 07:39
What if the replacement is after 9 Kaneria overs?

see if u replace a player who has bowled x over with opther player then new player can bowl 10-x over.
I hope its clear ur doubt

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:39
Eng 231/3

strauss 93* flintoff 12*

smoothcriminal
10th December 2005, 07:39
another remake of the 2004 karachi match?

zushy_786
10th December 2005, 07:39
Check the threads! On the days when Eng played on the weekends i was on (bar the last saturday). Check yourself!

4 more btw

Excuses excuses just like rest of the England team...

Rob H
10th December 2005, 07:40
Come on Brendon and Kyle! - You can do it

nafajafam
10th December 2005, 07:40
232-3

zushy_786
10th December 2005, 07:40
RH is protected by the Mods as part of the UN human rights convention - he is not to be made fun of (unless if he mentions any word with prefix reverse )

Too bad ! :16:

Rob H
10th December 2005, 07:41
Excuses excuses just like rest of the England team...
If only i could go off school. Then i'd be on :D

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:41
Flintoff drags ball past his stumps!

zushy_786
10th December 2005, 07:41
Come on Brendon and Kyle! - You can do it

Who are they, your kids :13:

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:41
50 partnership off 54 balls.

offstump
10th December 2005, 07:42
i still dont understand why they never picked arafat as the supersub.

Amjid Javed
10th December 2005, 07:43
strauss gone for 94!

Rob H
10th December 2005, 07:43
OUT OUT OUT. Was a poor shot

offstump
10th December 2005, 07:43
hahahah strauss saala choor