View Full Version : Pak V Eng: ODI 2: Score updates and discussion thread (Eng innings)
DotCom
12th December 2005, 07:11
This wicket is MUCH faster ... look at all the BOLDS ...
runs behind WICKET ..
HARMISON
ANDERSON
FLINTOFF
and even PLUNKETT
wont be easy to chase ... our batsmen struggle against good bounce ...
Big Mac
12th December 2005, 07:11
Solanki not rated at all by the England management
nafajafam
12th December 2005, 07:13
94.0mph short ball from shoaib
The_Cricket_Devil
12th December 2005, 07:13
wicket maiden for shoaib akthar gr8 bowling
Raz
12th December 2005, 07:13
Wicket maiden from Shoaib
nafajafam
12th December 2005, 07:13
120-7. 27overs
pacman
12th December 2005, 07:14
Commentators blaming the pitch :)))
zorawar
12th December 2005, 07:14
Blackwell's got huge mamey!!!
You pervert! :))) :))) :)))
Shayan_Sohail
12th December 2005, 07:15
This wicket is MUCH faster ... look at all the BOLDS ...
runs behind WICKET ..
HARMISON
ANDERSON
FLINTOFF
and even PLUNKETT
wont be easy to chase ... our batsmen struggle against good bounce ...
It is the same wicket as in the first ODI,
It is The Rawalpindi Express and Ranadinho who have changed from the first game.
nafajafam
12th December 2005, 07:15
Shoaib should rest next game. seeking medical attention again
aamir
12th December 2005, 07:15
i agree however a captain must put faith in his bowler's ability to bounce back and at least allow him to continue for another as not to dent his confidence and lower his morale
I think you are giving Inzi far too much credit on this one..... ;-)
zorawar
12th December 2005, 07:16
Shoaib should rest next game. seeking medical attention again
Totally Agree...!
immubhai
12th December 2005, 07:16
It is the same wicket as in the first ODI,
It is The Rawalpindi Express and Ranadinho who have changed from the first game.
lets hope you are not wrong..cos i dont want this happening to Pakistan
immubhai
12th December 2005, 07:16
Shoaib should rest next game. seeking medical attention again
oh bhai huwa kia haai usko?
DotCom
12th December 2005, 07:16
its the same wicket, but theres more pace in it .. it may have been watered differently ..rolled more .. etc...
just watching the mph can tell u that ..
175 is a fighting total ...
The_Cricket_Devil
12th December 2005, 07:17
I think you are giving Inzi far too much credit on this one..... ;-)
or is it that u are not giving him enough credit? :13:
nafajafam
12th December 2005, 07:17
oh bhai huwa kia haai usko?
getting his leg padded.
The_Cricket_Devil
12th December 2005, 07:17
oh bhai huwa kia haai usko?
something in his left leg he overstretched it earlier today and looked in a bit of pain. as we speak Danish has been brought on now
zorawar
12th December 2005, 07:18
oh bhai huwa kia haai usko?
I think some calf strain... not as serious as a ligament tear or hamstring etc.
The_Cricket_Devil
12th December 2005, 07:19
danish bowling far too wide here
immubhai
12th December 2005, 07:19
getting his leg padded.
thanks bhaijan :D
immubhai
12th December 2005, 07:19
I think some calf strain... not as serious as a ligament tear or hamstring etc.
thanks chotay bhai
DotCom
12th December 2005, 07:19
I think some calf strain... not as serious as a ligament tear or hamstring etc.
I think it happened in the 2nd over when he saved the four with one hand off of Ranas bowling ... I had the feeling
immubhai
12th December 2005, 07:19
getting his leg padded.
thanks baray bhai
The_Cricket_Devil
12th December 2005, 07:19
premeditated sweep for a single by plunkett
aamir
12th December 2005, 07:20
Another crap bowling change by Inzi. What a f***ing shambles his captaincy is.
Yes bring back the guy who is limping and prone to injuries when everything is under control. Absolutely freaking brilliant.
The_Cricket_Devil
12th December 2005, 07:21
drinks called ona fter a 3 run over by dani
Eng 125-7
nafajafam
12th December 2005, 07:21
who would support shoaib bowling off a shorter runup in onedays?
The_Cricket_Devil
12th December 2005, 07:22
who would support shoaib bowling off a shorter runup in onedays?
well i will support it if he can do it without reduced effectiveness
Amir_rulez
12th December 2005, 07:22
Yes bring back the guy who is limping and prone to injuries when everything is under control. Absolutely freaking brilliant.
well Sami aint limping. Is he?
The_Cricket_Devil
12th December 2005, 07:23
another dam four behind the wicket...
Big Mac
12th December 2005, 07:23
Danish is so useless it's funny
The_Cricket_Devil
12th December 2005, 07:24
disgusting fielding by danish
nafajafam
12th December 2005, 07:24
edge for 4 down third man. 130-7
DotCom
12th December 2005, 07:24
Danish is so useless it's funny
I thought he was playing for his fielding ...
:20:
offstump
12th December 2005, 07:24
crappy fielding by danish that was brutal
aamir
12th December 2005, 07:24
Well Rana took 2 wickets in an over, what a stupid decision to keep him in the attack eh
Yes because Inzi knew this would happen and kept persisting with Rana, as cold hard statistics and facts (which Inzi is always on top of) support the notion that a bowler going at 7.5 an over is likely to come back and take 2 wickets!
The_Cricket_Devil
12th December 2005, 07:24
Danish is so useless it's funny
BW should threaten him an axe from the team if he does not improve on it we cannot afford any slackers on the field
nafajafam
12th December 2005, 07:25
Dont think Danish will be playing next game with Afridi coming in
The_Cricket_Devil
12th December 2005, 07:26
Yes because Inzi knew this would happen and kept persisting with Rana, as cold hard statistics and facts (which Inzi is always on top of) support the notion that a bowler going at 7.5 an over is likely to come back and take 2 wickets!
Rana is a proven odi bowler thus he deserves the chance to redeem himself and im sure that is why inzi kept him on. HE SHOWED FAITH IN HIS BOWLING RESERVES! why is it so hard to believe that?
pacman
12th December 2005, 07:27
Danish strikes. Collingwood gone.
The_Cricket_Devil
12th December 2005, 07:27
and as we talk of danish's uselessness he takes a caught and bowled catch as collyflower finally goes
pacman
12th December 2005, 07:27
Solanki in.
Raz
12th December 2005, 07:28
Kaneria strikes. Collingwood caught and bowled!
The_Cricket_Devil
12th December 2005, 07:28
imo this is is too late for solanki too come in now however this should be interesting
Sheikh
12th December 2005, 07:28
Danish!!
Great captaincy again by Inzi!!!
hasanahmad
12th December 2005, 07:29
James Anderson will not bowl. England are 1 bowler short now
Collingwood
Plunkett
Flintoff
Harmison
Blackwell
Thats all England will have
The_Cricket_Devil
12th December 2005, 07:29
off the mark right away with a nervous shot
aamir
12th December 2005, 07:29
or is it that u are not giving him enough credit? :13:
It is all conjecture I am afraid no one knows for sure what the big man thinks...or even when and if he does ;-)
immubhai
12th December 2005, 07:29
did n't i say they are going to make Jimmy boy sit for Solanki, boy, they again had luck with Super Sub
The_Cricket_Devil
12th December 2005, 07:30
It is all conjecture I am afraid no one knows for sure what the big man thinks...or even when and if he does ;-)
exactly. Therefore we should all just sit back and let the match unfold and stop the captaincy criticizing comments
aamir
12th December 2005, 07:31
Rana is a proven odi bowler thus he deserves the chance to redeem himself and im sure that is why inzi kept him on. HE SHOWED FAITH IN HIS BOWLING RESERVES! why is it so hard to believe that?
Yes just like he did in the first game...worked extremely well in that game, no as well.
The_Cricket_Devil
12th December 2005, 07:31
2 more runs down to fine leg
Big Mac
12th December 2005, 07:32
Yes because Inzi knew this would happen and kept persisting with Rana, as cold hard statistics and facts (which Inzi is always on top of) support the notion that a bowler going at 7.5 an over is likely to come back and take 2 wickets!
He's done it before. Don't you remember the pumping he got from India before bouncing back to take some important wickets?
nafajafam
12th December 2005, 07:32
shouldnt solanki have come in for plunkett?
The_Cricket_Devil
12th December 2005, 07:32
Yes just like he did in the first game...worked extremely well in that game, no as well.
agn this relates to a previous argument. It isnt the captains fault if the bowlers have a rough day no particular bowler did well that day and inzi worked with it the best he could
The_Cricket_Devil
12th December 2005, 07:33
good fielding there by moh'd sami
The_Cricket_Devil
12th December 2005, 07:34
thats a good shot by solanki for 4 to end the over 139-8
aamir
12th December 2005, 07:34
exactly. Therefore we should all just sit back and let the match unfold and stop the captaincy criticizing comments
Not so fast, he well within his rights think what he does and not at all, but he remains answerable for his *decisions* as a captain. There no such thing as Authority without checks and balances.
Oxy
12th December 2005, 07:36
I guess the Inzi haters must be devestated that HE led us to THAT 2-0 victory over England!!!
Big Mac
12th December 2005, 07:36
shouldnt solanki have come in for plunkett?
Plunkett's a better batsman than both Jimmeh Anderson and Harmison and they need to make sure the tailenders can hang around with Solanki right now. Anderson's the weakest batsman in the XI and he's hit and miss as a bowler.
Oxy
12th December 2005, 07:37
Solanki is very dangerous in these situations-can easily work his way to 50-60 runs without you realising
The_Cricket_Devil
12th December 2005, 07:37
shoaib malik into the attack now
Amir_rulez
12th December 2005, 07:38
If England crosses 220 from this situation, it wud be a big captaincy flaw.
Big Mac
12th December 2005, 07:38
Not so fast, he well within his rights think what he does and not at all, but he remains answerable for his *decisions* as a captain. There no such thing as Authority without checks and balances.
Haha, you can harp on about "checks and balances" and "cold hard statistics and facts" all you like but feel free to continue to ignore the importance that gut instinct plays in captaincy as well.
And with a gut the size of Inzi's who are we to argue with it's instinct?
The_Cricket_Devil
12th December 2005, 07:39
Haha, you can harp on about "checks and balances" and "cold hard statistics and facts" all you like but feel free to continue the importance that gut instinct plays in captaincy as well.
And with a gut the size of Inzi's who are we to argue with it's instinct?
:)))
Oxy
12th December 2005, 07:39
If England crosses 220 from this situation, it wud be a big captaincy flaw.
How?
The_Cricket_Devil
12th December 2005, 07:40
well played for 4 by plunkett
The_Cricket_Devil
12th December 2005, 07:41
neways guys its getting really late here now so im gonna go to bed inshallah pakistan will win this match allahafiz all
aamir
12th December 2005, 07:42
agn this relates to a previous argument. It isnt the captains fault if the bowlers have a rough day no particular bowler did well that day and inzi worked with it the best he could
Yes it is the captains fault if he bowls someone who IS ALREADY having a bad day and not someone who IS HAVING a good day (in comparison) and has overs left.
Oxy
12th December 2005, 07:42
neways guys its getting really late here now so im gonna go to bed inshallah pakistan will win this match allahafiz all
Now thats too bad!
Jonty
12th December 2005, 07:43
wow.. fantastic stuff!
Oxy
12th December 2005, 07:44
Yes it is the captains fault if he bowls someone who IS ALREADY having a bad day and not someone who IS HAVING a good day (in comparison) and has overs left.
If you are referring to Rana, he had 5 consecutive bad balls. Went from 4 overs for 15, to 5 overs for 32. Then recovered DAMN well!
Amir_rulez
12th December 2005, 07:45
How?
Situation demands u to go for a kill and finish off their innings as soon as possible. What do we do? We have spinners on both ends. Dont u think a pacer is more likely to rattle the tailenders?
badxhah
12th December 2005, 07:46
y is inzy lettin game drift bring on shooby rana or razzler
aamir
12th December 2005, 07:46
Haha, you can harp on about "checks and balances" and "cold hard statistics and facts" all you like but feel free to continue to ignore the importance that gut instinct plays in captaincy as well.
And with a gut the size of Inzi's who are we to argue with it's instinct?
The only thing I agree about there is the size of Inzi gut.... And yes facts are overrated anyways!
karachiite
12th December 2005, 07:46
Are there any demons in the pitch ot have england been undone by purely good bowling by pak?
hatch101
12th December 2005, 07:47
I think Inzi should bring Akhtar back into the attack, even though he is giving away easy runs, he's also taken wickets and the sooner Englands innings end the better!
hasanahmad
12th December 2005, 07:47
inzi more concerned about over rate than wickets
badxhah
12th December 2005, 07:47
partnership of 31
akpower
12th December 2005, 07:48
Shoaib shd be back from one end and maybe sami from the other.
Also shd replace Kaneria by supersub Arshad, just to try another option. Wouldn't hurt.
Big Mac
12th December 2005, 07:48
These 2 have a nice little partnership now but what can Inzi do? The "cold hard statistics and facts" dictate that we can't bring Rana on because he got smashed earlier and Shoaib is injured so Inzi mustn't let him bowl again. Razzaq is still coming back from injury so the "checks and balances" mean he shouldn't be given the ball as well and Sami is just crap.
What can Inzi do here?!?!?
hasan316
12th December 2005, 07:49
Bring on Shoaib and let him take 5 wickets. beautiful bowling by Shabby
karachiite
12th December 2005, 07:49
These two seem to be getting runs with alarming ease.Maybe we should try sami
Jonty
12th December 2005, 07:49
hey guys, is anderson still able to come back on to bowl later on? or his game over?
badxhah
12th December 2005, 07:50
oh crap inzy shud look at the bigger picture rather goin for overate hai so far his captaincy has been spot on except for this spiiner part
akpower
12th December 2005, 07:50
Are there any demons in the pitch ot have england been undone by purely good bowling by pak?
Nothing really. It was just a case of Pak bowler's mixing it up n bowling some brilliant deliveries.
Shayan_Sohail
12th December 2005, 07:50
hey guys, is anderson still able to come back on to bowl later on? or his game over?
His game is over, England are a bowler short now.
azcali78
12th December 2005, 07:50
Bad Captaincy by Inzy again. Bring on your quicks and get these guys out. Bad bad bad
ontheBackfoot
12th December 2005, 07:50
Bring the all powerful SuperSub "Arshad khan" now. A bowler English players are not familiar with. He didnt bowl in the Test. Now is the time to use supersub. Maybe the element of surprise will get the JOB done.
MIG
12th December 2005, 07:51
is Solanki stumped ?
Jonty
12th December 2005, 07:51
not sure abou tthat backfoot... now that we have england reeling, i dont think we require the sub, who would probably come at the expense of a batsman.
akpower
12th December 2005, 07:52
hey guys, is anderson still able to come back on to bowl later on? or his game over?
no he's not coming back.
Jonty
12th December 2005, 07:53
arshad khan hacking into cricinfo servers because he aint getting a game
Oxy
12th December 2005, 07:53
is Solanki stumped ?
No- foot was grounded.
aamir
12th December 2005, 07:53
If you are referring to Rana, he had 5 consecutive bad balls. Went from 4 overs for 15, to 5 overs for 32. Then recovered DAMN well!
Well I like Rana as a bowler but I just don't like Inzi's captaincy most of the time. Sorry....
Big Mac
12th December 2005, 07:54
Oh ****, hope he's alright. If there's any silver lining it's only his left shoulder at least
akpower
12th December 2005, 07:54
arshad khan hacking into cricinfo servers because he aint getting a game
haha
Oxy
12th December 2005, 07:55
Well I like Rana as a bowler but I just don't like Inzi's captaincy most of the time. Sorry....
At least you're honest about your anti-Inzi sentiments...I take it you didnt rate his 2-0 success quite recently?
Amir_rulez
12th December 2005, 07:55
I see some serious gymnasium sessions coming for Danish ;)
Azam6380
12th December 2005, 07:55
Danish injured.....hope hes ok....
offstump
12th December 2005, 07:55
danish looks like he was shot
pacman
12th December 2005, 07:55
Arshad Khan subbing Danish.
MIG
12th December 2005, 07:56
Can Arshad Khan be brought in now ?
Kaneria may have dislocated his shoulder there, physio summoned.
azcali78
12th December 2005, 07:56
Why cant he be more like captain who thinks. Cmon he is been a skipper for more then 2 years. This is common sense, I am so upset. Why is he more concern with overs then getting them out and Danish is gone for series... I am kind a glad about that he is not a one day player anyway
CrickFan
12th December 2005, 07:56
Inzy bhai has gone to sleep..will this partnership be crucial ?
badxhah
12th December 2005, 07:56
i hate to say this may this injury will be a blessing is disguise for pak
Raz
12th December 2005, 07:56
Paratha belly coming on now to field in place of Kaneria.
Amir_rulez
12th December 2005, 07:57
At least you're honest about your anti-Inzi sentiments...I take it you didnt rate his 2-0 success quite recently?
what has that 2-0 victory got to do with the wrong decision being made here?
MIG
12th December 2005, 07:57
Danish does seem to fall awkwardly - even on the last day of the 3rd test he fell over after taking a wicket.....boy has serious balance/gravity issues!
Jonty
12th December 2005, 07:57
well arshad khan can bowl 4 overs max
ontheBackfoot
12th December 2005, 07:57
not sure abou tthat backfoot... now that we have england reeling, i dont think we require the sub, who would probably come at the expense of a batsman.
I agree.... Its would have been better if they had an allrounder superSub.
offstump
12th December 2005, 07:57
and the brilliant decision pays off, supersub is in
badxhah
12th December 2005, 07:57
if inzy gives the next over to arshad khan ... i *** ??/
hatch101
12th December 2005, 07:58
Bring the all powerful SuperSub "Arshad khan" now. A bowler English players are not familiar with. He didnt bowl in the Test. Now is the time to use supersub. Maybe the element of surprise will get the JOB done.
I think wasting a batsmen by bringing a sub is not worth it..the "JOB" can be done by bringing the fast bowlers back into attack!
cricketcrazy
12th December 2005, 07:58
wht the hell Inzi n Bob r thinking ??? damn it bring shoaib
aamir
12th December 2005, 07:58
These 2 have a nice little partnership now but what can Inzi do? The "cold hard statistics and facts" dictate that we can't bring Rana on because he got smashed earlier and Shoaib is injured so Inzi mustn't let him bowl again. Razzaq is still coming back from injury so the "checks and balances" mean he shouldn't be given the ball as well and Sami is just crap.
What can Inzi do here?!?!?
You are making you own inferences and try to associate them to my statements. How old are you?
offstump
12th December 2005, 07:58
this is gross, we should have finished england off a long time ago, this way they're goona easily get 200+
badxhah
12th December 2005, 07:58
really poor cricket
Raz
12th December 2005, 07:59
Paratha belly coming on to bowl
Shayan_Sohail
12th December 2005, 07:59
Why is Inzi continuing with spinners we have 4 seamers who have done well and there are only 10 overs left, this is poor captaincy.
badxhah
12th December 2005, 07:59
holy Fcuk this could some one tell me wat the hell is inzy thinking ?
immubhai
12th December 2005, 07:59
Danish does seem to fall awkwardly - even on the last day of the 3rd test he fell over after taking a wicket.....boy has serious balance/gravity issues!
Is ge going to go for good?what about the coming India series? does it look that bad? His injury wont affect us in this series anymore, in next match Afridi coming in for him and now Super Sub would do the rest, by giving up 4/over...so lets hope Dani mian gets back for the next series ;-)
cricketcrazy
12th December 2005, 08:00
here u go Arshad th ebest bowler in our team is in
hasanahmad
12th December 2005, 08:00
if Pakistan lose this match by 20-40 runs Inzamam will be the sole reason they lost
stb
12th December 2005, 08:00
pak have got to get these 2 wickets quickly or they will have trouble chasing a 220+ figure
akpower
12th December 2005, 08:00
uncle coming in to bowl
Big Mac
12th December 2005, 08:00
You are making you own inferences and try to associate them to my statements. How old are you?
What's the matter grandad? Lost yer sense of humour?
Shayan_Sohail
12th December 2005, 08:00
We have just given England free runs in these past 5 overs.
offstump
12th December 2005, 08:00
plunkett is goona get a 50 this is embarassing
aamir
12th December 2005, 08:00
Funny comment from Rameez.
"Inzi is such good captaincy form that he is going to topple England with Shoaib Malik and Arshad Khan."
;-)
lakha84
12th December 2005, 08:00
what is inzi doing why not bringing fast bowlers
MIG
12th December 2005, 08:01
Yaar - Inzi is running the show - you guys arent ! and there is a reason for that - cos he knows better ! Could it be that he knows more than you chaps - could it be possible ?
CrickFan
12th December 2005, 08:01
If england somehow win this - this session of play will really haunt Pakistan -
Raz
12th December 2005, 08:02
Yaar - Inzi is running the show - you guys arent ! and there is a reason for that - cos he knows better ! Could it be that he knows more than you chaps - could it be possible ?
You make it sound like some kind of crime investigation!!
Amir_rulez
12th December 2005, 08:02
Yaar - Inzi is running the show - you guys arent ! and there is a reason for that - cos he knows better ! Could it be that he knows more than you chaps - could it be possible ?
For that matter Woolmer and Inzi run the show all year round... why threads after threads, discussions after discussions on the forum, eh?
octavian
12th December 2005, 08:02
may be he knows more than us MIGYY but what abot former test players sitting in commentary box ?
hasanahmad
12th December 2005, 08:02
Yaar - Inzi is running the show - you guys arent ! and there is a reason for that - cos he knows better ! Could it be that he knows more than you chaps - could it be possible ?
running the show has led to a 6 from a number 9 bowler
badxhah
12th December 2005, 08:02
Yaar - Inzi is running the show - you guys arent ! and there is a reason for that - cos he knows better ! Could it be that he knows more than you chaps - could it be possible ?
you are abs right Miggy bahi but the thing they were 8 down even the majority of commemtaors are sayin this.
Raz
12th December 2005, 08:02
Plunkett smashes a 6 off Malik!
azcali78
12th December 2005, 08:03
MIG I admire Inzy as a player but sometime you really have to ask what he is thinking. Seems like Inzy comes on the filed from instructions form Bob and then forget that he is the captain.
Ayubi
12th December 2005, 08:03
Yaar - Inzi is running the show - you guys arent ! and there is a reason for that - cos he knows better ! Could it be that he knows more than you chaps - could it be possible ?
Miggy bhai, how can anyone justify this??!!!
yk
12th December 2005, 08:03
COME ON INZI, bring on Rana or Sami, to clean up the tail!!!!!
Shayan_Sohail
12th December 2005, 08:03
Yaar - Inzi is running the show - you guys arent ! and there is a reason for that - cos he knows better ! Could it be that he knows more than you chaps - could it be possible ?
hmm four seamers are available who have all done well, ten overs left, spinners have leaked runs, yet he still continued with the spinners. Dont see any logical reasoning there unless Rana, Shoaib, Razzaq and Sami are all injured.
aamir
12th December 2005, 08:03
What's the matter grandad? Lost yer sense of humour?
If you had a smile on your face while typing that...I apologize! But you do know that I cannot see you :-)
offstump
12th December 2005, 08:03
even the commentators are baffled by inzi's spin from both ends, not just us
hasanahmad
12th December 2005, 08:03
Englands best number 9 partnership in ODIs vs any country. Thank you Inzamam ul Haq
lakha84
12th December 2005, 08:03
is inzimam out of his mind
immubhai
12th December 2005, 08:03
what is inzi doing why not bringing fast bowlers
Inzi ko aawaaz lagaa bhaai, bring in Sami or Rana, they all have overs left. Why consisting with Malik?
octavian
12th December 2005, 08:04
damn man.. this is as dumb as it gets !!!!!!!!
Lightning
12th December 2005, 08:04
After watching with delight for first 30 overs. I have to ask what is Inzi on? This is the stupidest thing i've ever seen, honestly. Unbelievable!!
the SHA
12th December 2005, 08:04
I have no problem with inexplicable tactics as long as you win the game. If Pak somehow manage to fail their run chase, then yes questions must be asked about this present bowling strategy.
akpower
12th December 2005, 08:04
Yaar - Inzi is running the show - you guys arent ! and there is a reason for that - cos he knows better ! Could it be that he knows more than you chaps - could it be possible ?
not really..!
:16:
hasanahmad
12th December 2005, 08:04
*** arshad still continuing? inzamam has gone nuts
offstump
12th December 2005, 08:04
*** 8 overs left, and still arshad khan holy crap
Rabbani
12th December 2005, 08:04
Could we have all this negative sentiments after the Match Ends, we have lots of time for sooking over Inzi Captaincy,
MIG
12th December 2005, 08:04
There is nothing in the pitch - it remains the same pitch that we played on the other day - same players - we will win this easily. England bowlers are under pressure here with Anderson gone.
CrickFan
12th December 2005, 08:04
running the show has led to a 6 from a number 9 bowler
That is Inzy's brilliance and inspirational captaincy for you guys - andho mein kaana raja ..He is the capatin bcoz he is the best bat and the eldest buzurg in the team
Oxy
12th December 2005, 08:05
plunkett is goona get a 50 this is embarassing
ARe you watching the game? Plunkett has played outstanding. Clean,crisp hitting.
Shayan_Sohail
12th December 2005, 08:05
Oh my god he still continues with spinner, looks like Inzi really wants to make a match out of this.
hasanahmad
12th December 2005, 08:05
ARe you watching the game? Plunkett has played outstanding. Clean,crisp hitting.
against spinners, he had no clue vs razzaq and akhtar
Oxy
12th December 2005, 08:05
I have no problem with inexplicable tactics as long as you win the game. If Pak somehow manage to fail their run chase, then yes questions must be asked about this present bowling strategy.
Jeez!! A voice of reason...can I ban him guys???
CrickFan
12th December 2005, 08:06
Even if Pakistan wins - people have every right to question Inzy - it can cost him matches in the future ...
hasanahmad
12th December 2005, 08:06
4 more to inzamam, well played
Oxy
12th December 2005, 08:06
Only OUR batsman can lose this game.
badxhah
12th December 2005, 08:06
ARe you watching the game? Plunkett has played outstanding. Clean,crisp hitting.
he may be batting good but u have to say that by bowling ur spinner u gave him hope
offstump
12th December 2005, 08:06
ARe you watching the game? Plunkett has played outstanding. Clean,crisp hitting.
yes i am watching the game and most of his runs have come against malik and co
CrickFan
12th December 2005, 08:06
but why blame Inzy alone - what is bob being paid for ? listenting to music on his laptop and making faces when match is in progress ?
hasanahmad
12th December 2005, 08:06
Only OUR batsman can lose this game.
and they have lost going after a low score, which makes this more puzzling
hasanahmad
12th December 2005, 08:07
finally a change
badxhah
12th December 2005, 08:07
jus think wont the england team be motivated after comming frm 138-8 to 240(approx)
akpower
12th December 2005, 08:07
but why blame Inzy alone - what is bob being paid for ? listenting to music on his laptop and making faces when match is in progress ?
yeah its his fault too
Amir_rulez
12th December 2005, 08:07
but why blame Inzy alone - what is bob being paid for ? listenting to music on his laptop and making faces when match is in progress ?
he is NOT in the ground... or is he?
ontheBackfoot
12th December 2005, 08:07
Inzimam is out of options......
2 overs from Abdul razzaq and RANA
3 over from Sami and Shoaib
that makes up 10 overs....
What can inzi do......????
octavian
12th December 2005, 08:07
as the say in NY unnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn-believable
yk
12th December 2005, 08:07
WHAT IS GOING ON, we're losing the plot here, anything above 220, will be hard to chase
aamir
12th December 2005, 08:08
hmm four seamers are available who have all done well, ten overs left, spinners have leaked runs, yet he still continued with the spinners. Dont see any logical reasoning there unless Rana, Shoaib, Razzaq and Sami are all injured.
No no it is Inzi special plan...he is going for the kill.....
lakha84
12th December 2005, 08:08
my mind is bout to blow up
Shayan_Sohail
12th December 2005, 08:08
ridiculous captaincy by Inzy, even if we win.
A thread coming up: 'Inzy let himself down today'
immubhai
12th December 2005, 08:08
current partnership 70 runs.....Oh bhai Inzi..........laga bhai Ranaaai ko or bring in Sami!!!!!!!Inzi AAAAAAAAAAallllllllllloooooooooooo
Big Mac
12th December 2005, 08:08
Inzimam is out of options......
2 overs from Abdul razzaq and RANA
3 over from Sami and Shoaib
that makes up 10 overs....
What can inzi do......????
You know that if we bowl them out then we don't need to bowl the whole 50 overs right?
Lightning
12th December 2005, 08:09
Inzimam is out of options......
2 overs from Abdul razzaq and RANA
3 over from Sami and Shoaib
that makes up 10 overs....
What can inzi do......???? Too many options have left Inzi's brain in a twist. England team must be laughing their heads off in disbelief!
hasanahmad
12th December 2005, 08:09
another run to inzi, good shot
hatch101
12th December 2005, 08:09
This has seriously got to be the worst case of captaincy, actually not the worst but the most stupid and dumbest!
I totally love Inzi's captaincy and himself but this is just outrageous!
badxhah
12th December 2005, 08:09
Inzimam is out of options......
2 overs from Abdul razzaq and RANA
3 over from Sami and Shoaib
that makes up 10 overs....
What can inzi do......????
he could have gamblled a little by bowling shobby or rana out in order to destroy eng
Amir_rulez
12th December 2005, 08:10
and im assuming Plunkett still looks all clean and outstanding and crispy?
immubhai
12th December 2005, 08:10
Inzimam is out of options......
2 overs from Abdul razzaq and RANA
3 over from Sami and Shoaib
that makes up 10 overs....
What can inzi do......????
now this is tricky for Inzi ;-) its too complicated for Aalooobhai, keeping all this overs count, who has how many overs left? he likes to keep things simple, means, he seems like continuing with same Arshad khan and Malik...
ontheBackfoot
12th December 2005, 08:10
You know that if we bowl them out then we don't need to bowl the whole 50 overs right?
Maybe we don't need the pacers...... USE only shoaib malik and arshad khan :6:
from_da_lost_dim3nsion
12th December 2005, 08:11
Jeez!! A voice of reason...can I ban him guys???
:))) :))) :))) :)))
funny , thanks 4 a laugh
octavian
12th December 2005, 08:11
Pakistan team managment needs to Ban Lassi n breakfast.. specially for our Kuptaan
hasanahmad
12th December 2005, 08:11
arhad still bowling, amazing, what a screwed up day, pakistan might as well give up the match
octavian
12th December 2005, 08:11
Pakistan team managment needs to Ban Lassi in breakfast.. specially for our Kuptaan
CrickFan
12th December 2005, 08:11
70 runs in 13 overs at a very brisk pace - I am apalled ..problem is even if inzy loses ..he will blame someone else for the loss - like malik and arshad didn't tell me that they won't be able to take wickets ..
akpower
12th December 2005, 08:11
10 overs ago, if they gave two more overs to shoaib it would have probably all been over before england reached 150
madaboutlfc
12th December 2005, 08:11
what an idiotic piece of captaincy. Inzamam lacks the aggression.. England should never had made 200
cricketcrazy
12th December 2005, 08:12
Arshad nai Inzi ko paisiay diyea hian ???
immubhai
12th December 2005, 08:12
I am sorry for calling Inzi the great Aaaalooo, sorry Inzi you are great but captaincy seems difficult right now for you
Shayan_Sohail
12th December 2005, 08:12
He continues with Arshad, great captaincy
Amir_rulez
12th December 2005, 08:12
England makes a match of it...sweet.
offstump
12th December 2005, 08:13
i hope arshad opens the batting too
lakha84
12th December 2005, 08:13
this is fcuk up
badxhah
12th December 2005, 08:13
Inzy wat have u done ??? forget the partnership forget the spinner ..when botham is gona come on air he will make brain yougart ( dimagh ki dahi )
hasanahmad
12th December 2005, 08:13
inzi seems to have ate a lot of allooos today, with shorba
CrickFan
12th December 2005, 08:13
For the good of Pakistan cricket ..please play inzy only as a batsman - please do not make him the captain
lakha84
12th December 2005, 08:14
piece of **** captaincy
Amir_rulez
12th December 2005, 08:14
England makes a match of it...sweet.
let me rectify it .... WE make a match of it!
ontheBackfoot
12th December 2005, 08:14
He continues with Arshad, great captaincy
SHOOT me .... i want to die :(
immubhai
12th December 2005, 08:14
inzi seems to have ate a lot of allooos today, with shorba
:)))
Azam6380
12th December 2005, 08:14
ridiculous.....absolutely f*****g stupid
khan_ohmss
12th December 2005, 08:15
I was going to ask which team is trying it's best to lose the game - quite obviously that oaf Inzi is ahead at the moment!
offstump
12th December 2005, 08:15
partnership 81 off 91 balls
cricketcrazy
12th December 2005, 08:15
SHOOT me .... i want to die :(
na kill me first plz
hasanahmad
12th December 2005, 08:15
Im thinking this might be the experimenting that Woolmer was talking about?
Amir_rulez
12th December 2005, 08:16
na kill me first plz
ill kill u both, get me the gun ;)
immubhai
12th December 2005, 08:16
now who should open today?
CrickFan
12th December 2005, 08:16
Well done Inzy bhai -- bahut aala .. I am putting my neck on the block - Pakistan is going to lose this match (and they deserve it ) - that is my prediction
lakha84
12th December 2005, 08:16
na kill me first plz
no me first
badxhah
12th December 2005, 08:17
Already the forum is filling up wid Inzy threads
Genghis
12th December 2005, 08:17
I have got a bad feeling about this game today. With England getting the psychological advantage now ... the openers will be under a lot of pressure.
badxhah
12th December 2005, 08:17
now who should open today?
arshad khan and danny
Muddaser
12th December 2005, 08:17
Im thinking this might be the experimenting that Woolmer was talking about?
Maybe.
Trying to justify Kaneria and Arshads inclusion in the team.
ontheBackfoot
12th December 2005, 08:17
212 and four more overs to GO......
Now inzi cant think of anything but LUNCH....so please ppl everyone has limits and ...this is beyond INZI 's limits
immubhai
12th December 2005, 08:17
please dont make Akmal do it again, poor chap has kept wicket again today for 50 overs, send Malik in or even make Arshad Khan do it...Inzi bha, bring Rana in, why Arshad Lasssi maker?
hasanahmad
12th December 2005, 08:18
I have got a bad feeling about this game today. With England getting the psychological advantage now ... the openers will be under a lot of pressure.
unless butt comes out as the angry man
cricketcrazy
12th December 2005, 08:18
oh shoaib is back
lakha84
12th December 2005, 08:18
about timeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
azcali78
12th December 2005, 08:19
I wonder is pakistan trying to be a good host to england and dont give them a really bad loss????
aamir
12th December 2005, 08:19
The problem is that if Pakistan wins people will forget about Inzi's lapses and even if it does not cost us the match this time next time it will..
Some people actually thought Inzi *was going in for a kill* ...when Shoaib came back to bowl in the first 20 overs.... :)))
yk
12th December 2005, 08:19
Shoiab best not give 20 away in the over, and No no balls
hasanahmad
12th December 2005, 08:20
Maybe the guy who makes inzi's parathay and allu kee tarkari can only come between the lunch break and as there is no microwave in the dressing room, he wants his food all fresh and hot so he wants england wants to play 50 overs
hatch101
12th December 2005, 08:20
Finally Shoaib is back on
the Great Khan
12th December 2005, 08:20
hain...??..erm why the Inzi bashing?? ok so he's brought ona rshad khan..well danish and shoaib are injured so who do you suggest??...and from what i can see we should be able to chase anything upto 250-260 on this pitch..if we dont then we deserve to lose!!!...so why dont you bahchas calm down a bit!!
Azam6380
12th December 2005, 08:21
Plunkett 50.....ridiculous....
hasanahmad
12th December 2005, 08:21
hain...??..erm why the Inzi bashing?? ok so he's brought ona rshad khan..well danish and shoaib are injured so who do you suggest??...and from what i can see we should be able to chase anything upto 250-260 on this pitch..if we dont then we deserve to lose!!!...so why dont you bahchas calm down a bit!!
go for wickets, not over rate
aamir
12th December 2005, 08:21
Plunkett gets 50....he should Inzi a thank you note for sure....
Raz
12th December 2005, 08:21
Plunkett brings up his 50
azcali78
12th December 2005, 08:22
I cant belive this a bowler getting 50
badxhah
12th December 2005, 08:22
plucket ki 50 waha per pathan bahi appraching madien test 100
Lekin tension nahi lena ka ... kia
CrickFan
12th December 2005, 08:23
another "bogey man" for Pakistan is born - courtesy Inzy ...
Shayan_Sohail
12th December 2005, 08:23
hain...??..erm why the Inzi bashing?? ok so he's brought ona rshad khan..well danish and shoaib are injured so who do you suggest??...and from what i can see we should be able to chase anything upto 250-260 on this pitch..if we dont then we deserve to lose!!!...so why dont you bahchas calm down a bit!!
Yeah brought Arshad khan till the 44th over, match could have been over much earlier but Inzi took the 'safe' option.
lakha84
12th December 2005, 08:23
i m f****************ing ******
akpower
12th December 2005, 08:23
hain...??..erm why the Inzi bashing?? ok so he's brought ona rshad khan..well danish and shoaib are injured so who do you suggest??...and from what i can see we should be able to chase anything upto 250-260 on this pitch..if we dont then we deserve to lose!!!...so why dont you bahchas calm down a bit!!
by the time danish got injured 40 overs were gone. shoaib is not fit, but was still fit enough to pick up 2 wkts in no time. what r u talkin abt
CrickFan
12th December 2005, 08:24
Inzy please take the bowl yourself and start bowling at the death - Please yaar England ko jeeta kar bhejo
lakha84
12th December 2005, 08:25
hahaha 96 run partnership
lakha84
12th December 2005, 08:25
we need to stop giving aloos to inzi for 1 week
Shayan_Sohail
12th December 2005, 08:25
by the time danish got injured 40 overs were gone. shoaib is not fit, but was still fit enough to pick up 2 wkts in no time. what r u talkin abt
Even if he couldnt bring in Shoaib, so what? he had rana, Sami, Razzaq.
immubhai
12th December 2005, 08:26
hahaha 96 run partnership
for the 9th wicket :)))
CrickFan
12th December 2005, 08:26
next 2 overs to be bowled by Inzy and Md yusuf
Oxy
12th December 2005, 08:27
hahaha 96 run partnership
Why so happy....are you sure you are supporting OUR team?
akpower
12th December 2005, 08:27
Even if he couldnt bring in Shoaib, so what? he had rana, Sami, Razzaq.
yeah thats true
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.