View Full Version : Razaq Vs Akhtar [Surprise Surprise!!!!!!!]
the true passionist
1st February 2005, 00:47
razaq has a better eccononmy
and razaq is a way better batsman!!!!
is Akhtar a liability on ODI??
although i maintain that he is our strike bowler in Tests but his ODI position asks for some explanation!!![/i]
Muddaser
1st February 2005, 00:50
Shoaib has played 120 ODIs and Razzaq has played 180 odd!
Oxy
1st February 2005, 00:52
The only thing that needs explanation are you BS stats!
Civil
1st February 2005, 01:04
Though your stats are not correct,
the point you make is a good one, Akhtar should not be in the Odi team, though Razzaq is not his replacement as strike bowler.
Once shabbir gul and sami are healthy we will have a clearer picture
Oxy
1st February 2005, 01:16
IF (a BIG 'IF') GUL and Shabbir are healthy! As for Sami, he could end playing 70-80 test matches for Pak...what a tragedy for our game.
Fessal
1st February 2005, 01:24
To compare Razzaq and Actor isnt fair for a number of reasons such as one being a strike bowler etc, the number of matches played etc etc.
Amjid Javed
1st February 2005, 07:14
fessel ive left you a message on the members forum.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.