Running on the pitch.

[billyoem]

Did anyone also notice the amount of times Pasesar was running down the pitch in to the danger areas ?
He even had one 'plumb' LBW turned down because he was blocking the umpire's view.
The umpires didn't warn him once. The commentators didn't mention it at all either.
Even Harmison was at it.

Now if Danish did it then.....
We all know what would have happened.
The English batsmen would have constantly 'bleated' to the umpires.

Maybe the Pakistani batsman should have done this.

[Long_Live_Pakistan]

Did anyone also notice the amount of times Pasesar was running down the pitch in to the danger areas ?
He even had one 'plumb' LBW turned down because he was blocking the umpire's view.
The umpires didn't warn him once. The commentators didn't mention it at all either.
Even Harmison was at it.

Now if Danish did it then.....
We all know what would have happened.
The English batsmen would have constantly 'bleated' to the umpires.

Maybe the Pakistani batsman should have done this.

he bowled very very well.. i would rather say that he actually surprised msot of ppl watching....
but he was running on the pitch..no doubts...his left leg was continously landing in the danger area....and he was not warned...

[Daoud]

Yeah, it was strange how there was no warning

Serves Panesar right though, getting an lbw rejected cause he blocked the umpires vision

[Oxy]

Did anyone also notice the amount of times Pasesar was running down the pitch in to the danger areas ?
He even had one 'plumb' LBW turned down because he was blocking the umpire's view.
The umpires didn't warn him once. The commentators didn't mention it at all either.
Even Harmison was at it.

Now if Danish did it then.....
We all know what would have happened.
The English batsmen would have constantly 'bleated' to the umpires.

Maybe the Pakistani batsman should have done this.

Didnt Hoggard get warned very early on?

[KA$H]

i think the umpires knew this game was dwindling into a draw

[ammarz]

the reason i believe that he wasnt warned was because he was very close in front of the stumps and not in places where the ball would be landing, thus not causing damage to the pitch in areas where it mattered. otherwise i am sure bucknor would have warned him.
was funny to see bucknors expression after panesars appeal was rejected that was funny :)

[veez]

well, if you recall , the commentators were mentioning this fact. It was not that monty was running into the danger zone but the fact that he was running straight and thus blocking the umpire's view.