View Full Version : Who is the most complete batsmen?
After Watching Lara bat today, Just made me think about who is the most complete batsmen in ODI cricket at the moment, in terms of shots all around the wicket, off both the front foot and back foot.
The likes of Razzaq and Afridi are great strikers of the ball, when the ball is pitched up, and allows them to launch in to there drives both on the offside and onside, both lofted and taking the aerial route.
But when it is bowled short, they struggle to get the ball away and are not effective with the Pull and Hooks Shots.
Who in your oppions are the most complete batsmen?
dan hudson
29th January 2005, 20:00
In ODI cricket Flintoff's as complete as anyone; pace, spin, full deliveries, short deliveries, he has no trouble with any of them.
Rob H
29th January 2005, 20:28
Flintoff is good. Kallis is another person like that maybe jayasuria as well
Sachin Tendulkar. without a doubt.
Uzi
29th January 2005, 21:51
For me Brian Lara.
Tendulkar has shots all around the wicket and off both feet. He has better balance as well and a more correct technique. I know I am nitpicking but you have to when its Tendu and Lara.
Michael Bevan no one has mentioned! THE finisher.
Geordie Ahmed
29th January 2005, 23:34
Australia have finished THE FINISHER
its a shame that he isnt playing cos he was a brilliant player
Nawazb
30th January 2005, 08:08
dravid for me
I dont think he has the ability to destroy a team through natural strokemaking brilliance like a Lara or a Tendu can.
razzler
30th January 2005, 14:01
Dravid and Lara for me. I have always rated these two above Tendulkar.
everyone has their own opinions. I just love the way Tendu plays straight down the ground. He is the best combo of grace and power.
tahaqureshi
30th January 2005, 14:08
dravid in my books is definitely above tendulkar..
but im not sure he has all the shots
to me, brian lara is the most complete player..and to know that, u don't have to actually watch any of his innings..
just knowing that he has made 400 not out in test cricket is witness to the fact that he must be complete...cuz in an innings of 400, he must've faced every single type of delivery there possibly is..
The fact he has 8 test tons in 26 tests against Oz is more telling. His 153* at Barbados was far better than his 400.
Knowing a batsman has 34 test tons says a lot about him, knowing a batsman can play for 15 years and average 57, and in odis score 13,000 runs, 44 avg, 87 SR.
At the end of the day stats cant describe the genius of these two all time great players.
the true passionist
31st January 2005, 06:34
well believe it or not this is how i see it...
In present cricket there are 3 batsman who r the best. No fourth comes close. People may vary in deciding the order but these three r the best ...no fourth comes close....
for me the order is...
1.Lara
2.Inzi
3.Tendulkar
my order is based on class and their contribution to the respective teams and CRICKET as whole..
Now some would say where is Langer, Dravid, Sarwan or Ponting...well they r in the next category
and mind u when u talk about most complete batsman u cant talk about flintoff, razaq or afridi..yes they r gr8 players but not the most complete batsmen..
well let me suggest the most complete batsmen of the future
Martyn, Clarke, Sarwan
i would also not hesitate in throwing Butt as a wild card in aswell
pakistani pride
31st January 2005, 06:38
Inzamam for me !
Awesome Anjum
31st January 2005, 06:47
Brian Lara, followed by Ponting and Dravid.
nadeem
31st January 2005, 10:42
Inzi followed by lara. Inzi first because he plays pace better than anyone including lara.
Schiller
31st January 2005, 10:46
I would rate lara and then its open.
Fessal
31st January 2005, 10:47
Inzy and Lara but most entertaining are:
Lara
Freddie
Razzaq
Afridi
tendulkar by a mile. i am fed up of this anti Sachin brigade. I can sit here and say Imran and Wasim and Waqar were great yet Pakistanis cant acknowledge the greatest Indian player ever.
Sami for Captain
11th April 2005, 15:03
i dont think that dravid is a complete ODI player imo. i think bevan no doubt was the finisher but i must mention kevin pieterson and paul collingwood. even though im not a greAT FAN OF ENGALDN, THEY ARE GUD PROSPEcts
Fessal
11th April 2005, 15:08
Guest you are right about Tendulkar who I didn't mention before. Don't know how I forgot him, but in terms of handling mental pressure I am not so sure.
sajjad
11th April 2005, 15:09
SACHIN IS AN AWESOME PLAYER..
but dravid is even better.
34 ODI centuries....but cricinfo recetnly showed he has the lowest percentage of wins....when he scores a ton.
his value is not what the players is...its what he does when he is needed. and dravid is much more apt than sachin....much more!
GamBiTT
11th April 2005, 15:14
My gut feel after watching all these players over the last 20+ years:
1) Viv Richards (Didn't care about personal achievements)
2) Inzi (Underachiever; Beginning to do justice to his incredible talent at the age 34+)
3) Lara (Overachiever; incredible ability and appetite for runs)
3) Jacque Kallis (Very very capable player for any kind of situation. All the shots in the book with an great cricketing mind to go with it).
4) Ponting (Professional; whats expected of a truly great austrailian batsmen. Incredible talent!)
5) Tendulkar (Personal milestone is the name of the game; but there is certainly a lot of incredible ability involved there too)
Of Note: Dravid (Will probably beat most of Tendulkar's records in Tests for sure, BUT with class!), Langer, Thorpe
Players with abilities like above are incredible to watch when on song.
Looking forward to seeing Flintoff.
B-Man
11th April 2005, 15:15
gilchrist
GamBiTT
11th April 2005, 15:17
I should have included Gilchirst in my list ahead of many! An asset to Australian team which no other team currently has and may never have.
sajjad
11th April 2005, 15:23
Gilchrist for the Red Sox.. baby!
what abt Razzaq or Afridi or Flintoff...they wud make great baseball hitters too.
watch out barry, here comes afridi!!!!
Cartman
11th April 2005, 15:30
Graham Gooch in my opinion was the most complete batsman I have ever seen. He played every shot in the book against every type of bowler on any sort of track.
Civil
11th April 2005, 15:49
Yousuf Youhana skills wise is among the most complete batsman. He can change gears at will, he can make shots off either foot at will, and He doesnt seem to have difficulty against any bowler now that the pathan hex is over.
If anything that makes Youhana not be mentioned once in this thread is his mental concentration and running between wickets.
Ponting, Lara and Inzi are the top 3 in the world IMO
Khalil
11th April 2005, 16:05
I think it's Gibbs
The guy plays every shot in the book and he does it so naturally
I am surprised that some of you guys think it's Kallis. Jack Banister once attributing Kallis slow scoring rate due to his limited scoring shots he has. Kallis does not 'late cut', 'leg glance' or play any finer shots. He mainly drives
myasirsh
11th April 2005, 16:12
Lara for me 2.. :D
AFRIDI 10
11th April 2005, 16:15
it would ha have to be lara and ponting, but afridi is the most entertaining by far
Come on AFRIDI!! ;)+
JhonnyBravo
11th April 2005, 16:22
1.Rahul Dravid
2.Jack Kallis
3. Brian Lara
Officer Barbrady
11th April 2005, 16:23
Guys keep in mind the topic was on ODI players. I don't think Dravid and Kallis can make it.
AFRIDI 10
11th April 2005, 16:32
kaliis is apretty good ODI payer and so is dravd
Rob H
11th April 2005, 16:33
Lara and Martyn are classy players. They have the full package. I also rate Justin Langer becasue he able to dictate the bowling.
Officer Barbrady
11th April 2005, 16:35
But Langer doesn't even play one day cricket....
Afridi 10, yes they are but not sure if they can be called the most complete one-day batsmen.
Rob H
11th April 2005, 17:11
But Langer doesn't even play one day cricket....
Afridi 10, yes they are but not sure if they can be called the most complete one-day batsmen.
He could but they prefer Gilly
tendulkar by a mile. i am fed up of this anti Sachin brigade. I can sit here and say Imran and Wasim and Waqar were great yet Pakistanis cant acknowledge the greatest Indian player ever.
careful "guest". i am saying it nicely this time. dont come on this board to insult Pakistanis and expect to be treated nicely. if you have an opinion express it. but dont make general statements about pakistanis and their inability to recognize great players.
you may be surprised by the fact that there are some smart people on this board who know their cricket and can recognize tendulkar to be the gutless, vertically challenged wonder that he is...who will, along with his captain, sell his family up the river to win a cricket game. you dont agree with them fine, but do NOT insult Pakistanis.
Fawad
11th April 2005, 17:49
appeal till you squeal Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 5:28 pm Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous wrote:
tendulkar by a mile. i am fed up of this anti Sachin brigade. I can sit here and say Imran and Wasim and Waqar were great yet Pakistanis cant acknowledge the greatest Indian player ever.
careful "guest". i am saying it nicely this time. dont come on this board to insult Pakistanis and expect to be treated nicely. if you have an opinion express it. but dont make general statements about pakistanis and their inability to recognize great players.
you may be surprised by the fact that there are some smart people on this board who know their cricket and can recognize tendulkar to be the gutless, vertically challenged wonder that he is...who will, along with his captain, sell his family up the river to win a cricket game. you dont agree with them fine, but do NOT insult Pakistanis.
Spot on bro! ;)+
Tendu isn't even the best indian batsman of all time- Gavaskar is
Abdul Qadir 236
11th April 2005, 17:57
ur talking about odis - Tendulkar by a mile.
however, i dont think this is a good basis, it is test matches that show a great player. In tests, 2 guys stand out from the rest and they are Sachin and Lara.
Is that a racist comment too?
sajjad
11th April 2005, 18:30
AMIT...uve always been racist ;)
nice to see ya online again
Uzi
11th April 2005, 18:31
Once upon a time, Tendulkar was a great player, but he is far from great now.
For me the most complete batsman is Brian Lara.
Watching him bat is poetry in motion.
Where you been Gazza?
Abdul Qadir 236
11th April 2005, 18:36
people are quick to forget things in cricket.
it is my view that no one has ever performed as consistently for as long a period of time as Tendulkar.
sajjad
11th April 2005, 18:42
considering he starter wayyyy back in 87....he has performed really well.
but dravid......well he has a term to his name...."dravidian" any technically correct shot to me is a dravidian stroke....tendulkar is quite immaculate but more of a striker than a dravidian type of guy.
hasan316
11th April 2005, 18:50
LARA all the way. he is the best, can anyone imagine of making 400 in an inning. well he did it. he is too good.
octavian
11th April 2005, 19:01
Brian Lara is as complete as it can get.
Inzi, Ponting, Tendu follow him closely.
Abdul Qadir 236
11th April 2005, 19:04
well thats a fair point hasan. lara is 2nd to bradman for tall scores but for consistency, for a good technique, for a beautiful balance and strokes all around the wicket, i say sachin.
just a point to note,
lara 8 tons and 51 avg vs Aus
srt 7 and 53
inzi 1 and 34
am not saying thats the only criteria for a good player.
Dhondy
11th April 2005, 19:07
Inzi! :))) :))) :)))
Great player of fast bowling?
:))) :))) :)))
Have you seen his record against Australia & SA? :O
stats mean nothing. tendi has the heart of a kitten and the mind of a weasel. so what if he made a couple of tons. the man has no integrity and even less class. he is one of the worse ambassadors for cricket and has been shown up for being just that in the ongoing series against Pakistan.
Abdul Qadir 236
11th April 2005, 19:11
typical post from u.
Dhondy
11th April 2005, 19:16
What to talk of McGrath, he (Inzi) is Nehra's bunny.
Civil
11th April 2005, 19:22
What to talk of McGrath, he (Inzi) is Nehra's bunny.
:))) :))) :)))
oh man that made my day, you still hurting from the thrashing of your beloveds in Jamshedpur i see.
Inzi has the most time to play his shots, this is not disputed by anyone.
you can make up fantasy statements all you like, but i'd have inzi in my team any day then any paper tiger Indian batsmen that hides behind Virender.
Abdul Qadir 236
11th April 2005, 19:25
hides?
in odis Sachin bats at the top and has 10,000 runs, SR 86, 49 average.
tests, he bats in his normal position of 4. nothing wrong with that. india have their 2 openers (though would like jadhav there), dravid then tendulkar.
tests are not odis where u have limited time.
sajjad
11th April 2005, 19:27
stats mean nothing. tendi has the heart of a kitten and the mind of a weasel. so what if he made a couple of tons. the man has no integrity and even less class. he is one of the worse ambassadors for cricket and has been shown up for being just that in the ongoing series against Pakistan.
a bit too harsh on the little master there
firebelly
11th April 2005, 19:29
For me Tendulkar, then Inzi and then Lara in that order
Tendulkar the best player of spin right now (remember Warne Sydney and Mumbai)
Inzi Best player of Fast Bowling
Lara
Just great player with classy shots although he is selfish but still a class above the rest right now
from older guys
Mark Waugh
Civil
11th April 2005, 19:33
hides?
in odis Sachin bats at the top and has 10,000 runs, SR 86, 49 average.
tests, he bats in his normal position of 4. nothing wrong with that. india have their 2 openers (though would like jadhav there), dravid then tendulkar.
tests are not odis where u have limited time.
i meant to say that they only score runs when sehwag is making the bowlers sweat for them. not hide behind the order.
Do me a favour somebody bring up India's odi and test record in all the matches Tendulkars played in and bring up Pakistan's record
in all the matches Inzamam has played in.
We already know how 80 percent of Inzi's test centuries have helped Pakistan win, while almost half of Sachin's have but that doesnt seem to be enough to prove that Inzi is a better match winner.
stats mean nothing. tendi has the heart of a kitten and the mind of a weasel. so what if he made a couple of tons. the man has no integrity and even less class. he is one of the worse ambassadors for cricket and has been shown up for being just that in the ongoing series against Pakistan.
a bit too harsh on the little master there
perhaps Sajjad. but you will see this trend with the indians. they come on the scene, full of confidence and loaded with talent. with time the talent fades away either due to lack of mental strength or application. they are then left scraping for victories, as is the case with tendulkar who is now bowling outside leg stump in ODI's. I used to have respect for him but after having seen his habit of adamantly sticking to the crease when out and empolying the most negative of negative tactics, I have no doubt about the lack of integrity and class in the vertically challenged one.
the same thing has happened to ganguly, pathan is following the same fate and sehwag will eventually get there too.
Abdul Qadir 236
11th April 2005, 19:44
negative tactics! from a woolmer fan! oh heard it all now.
as cricket is a team game, teams win matches. only Imran fully understood the team concept. Aus dont have the best players but they have the best team.
zorawar
11th April 2005, 19:47
we should judge based more on Test matches than ODI cricket.
Current players:
Lara
Sachin
All others are either not consistent enough or have not reached the heights these two have. Dravid leads the way among the rest... and Inzi may be counted in the top 3 of his era when he retires if he continues to blossom as he has after becoming captain.
Retired:
Sir Viv Richards
Javed Miandad
Greg Chappell
Abdul Qadir 236
11th April 2005, 19:49
well said
negative tactics! from a woolmer fan! oh heard it all now.
you still have much to hear and a lot more to learn Gary. what negative tactics has BW employed since becoming coach of Pakistan??? stop making empty claims....never mind, thats all you ever do! :))2
sajjad
11th April 2005, 19:52
its not his claims that our empty..its his....oh nm...no personal comments...
woolmer rocks =B)
Civil
11th April 2005, 19:52
negative tactics! from a woolmer fan! oh heard it all now.
as cricket is a team game, teams win matches. only Imran fully understood the team concept. Aus dont have the best players but they have the best team.
so you admitting India is a bad team, shocking coming from you
and btw Mcgrath is the best seamer, Warne is the best leg spinner, Hayden and Langer are the best two openers, Gilchrist is the best wicketkepper batsman +most destructive batsman, and Damien martyn and ricky ponting (also best captain) are currently among the top 6 or 7 bats in the world far far ahead of SRT.
Abdul Qadir 236
11th April 2005, 19:56
its still as easy to separate the wheat from the chaff here.
they dont have a lara, a sachin, a murali, an akram.
real players of genius but guys who do the basics well and get rewarded for it. they also come through the best system around.
India are not a bad team when the play aggressive cricket.
Hash
11th April 2005, 19:59
what negative tactics has woolmer employed since becoming coach of Pakistan gary? need examples to back up your accusation!
otherwise anyone can post anything and just run away.
e.g. You know that guy called Tendulkar. Well......he is actually Martin Luther King in disguise.
See ridiculous comment......no evidence to back it up. Just like your comment about Woolmer and negative tactics.
Abdul Qadir 236
11th April 2005, 20:02
well not playing 11 specialists in tests for a start.
not going for kill when teams are down.
defensive fields.
bowlers who bowl to bore teams not fire them out.
zorawar
11th April 2005, 20:05
Woolmer and negative tactics need to be discussed in a different thread IMO... not on this thread which is about the most complete batsmen...
my 2 cents...
Hash
11th April 2005, 20:06
well not playing 11 specialists in tests for a start.
which tests are you talking about? I presume ones for which we had about a million injuries. In which case, what do we do? Pick somebody who can bowl but can't bat from domestic cricket ahead of someone who is a better bowler and batsman?
not going for kill when teams are down.
seemed to do that quite well in Bangalore chappy!
defensive fields.
didn;t realise woolmer was out there on the field telling players where to go. By the way......you notice his defensive fields in Bangalore?
bowlers who bowl to bore teams not fire them out.
like who? And who should have played instead of them? And why would they be able to fire the opposition out?
Hash
11th April 2005, 20:08
sorry zorawar......didn't read your post. You must have posted while i was typnig up. Gary if you want to reply......start a new thread.
Abdul Qadir 236
11th April 2005, 20:12
yeah some people will use any platform on which to attack me.
as i said, lara and sachin stand miles ahead of the rest.
i also have a lot more time for the greats of the 80s like greg chappell, miandad and richards who had to play some fearsome fast bowling.
hash, 1 swallow doesnt make a summer. it seems to modern fans that it does :) leave it at that.
Team Slayer
11th April 2005, 20:12
well not playing 11 specialists in tests for a start.
not going for kill when teams are down.
defensive fields.
bowlers who bowl to bore teams not fire them out.
and here we go again! did you watched the Banglore test?! if that's not going for the kill, i dont know what is! and btw, the same game chacha Wright set perhaps the most disgusting defensive field EVER! yah, im talking about the one set right after Afridi had thrashed the Indian bowlers to all parts of the ground...
and btw, the bits and pieces shahid afridi KICKED a$$...so much for the "11 specialists theory"!
Hash
11th April 2005, 20:17
gary- please get off your high horse. We don't 'use any platform to attack you'. You're not that important. But if you say something ridiculous without backing it up with examples and facts.....a place like PakPassion where there are a lot of people who know a lot about cricket.....it is not going to go unnoticed. Yuo have to accept that and stop being so bleedin sensitive. Nobody is picking on you, ok!
Wiji
11th April 2005, 20:21
When the topic of 'best batsman' in the world comes up, people always underrate Ricky Ponting. This man is truly class. I can easily put him up with Brian Lara and above Inzamam no matter how good a batsman Inzamam is. Ponting makes batting look SO easy. He is very less talked about in the cricketing world with respect to his skills. In my opinion his one of the best batsman ever in cricket. His style technique is almost perfect. Whether it's the pull or drive... he makes it look so easy. And his record is there to back him up. He has another good 7-8 years left in him and by that time he would have broken most of Tendulkar's records I think.
Abdul Qadir 236
11th April 2005, 20:22
someone ignored the post where i said about the team who played attacking cricket won the game and where i said 1 swallow doesnt make a summer.
hash there u go again.
Rob H
11th April 2005, 20:23
Stop the bickering children
Abdul Qadir 236
11th April 2005, 20:24
i dont like to watch Ponting to be honest. he is another one of the batsmen who improved when the top bowlers were leaving the scene and pitches flattened out across the world.
Saqib
11th April 2005, 20:41
A complete batsman can...
-Play all the shot in the book
-Can do what is captain ask
-Can play in all conditions seaming etc
-Can finsh the game
-Can win the match
-Can play both forms of the game corectly, not just after ODI series, he plays a test match still that ODI looking shape.
-Can play spin & fast good
-who doesn't get away with some bouncers
-Can play in pressure
-Can play with tailenders
-A batsman who not always looks for his own records but only play's for his team ! (Not Kallis :P )
Dhondy
11th April 2005, 21:12
ATYs, arre bhai what are you talking about? Sehwag will go the same way? Just because he is an Indian?
C'mon yaar. Don't join the loonies.
razzler
11th April 2005, 21:12
A complete batsman can...
-Play all the shot in the book
-Can do what is captain ask
-Can play in all conditions seaming etc
-Can finsh the game
-Can win the match
-Can play both forms of the game corectly, not just after ODI series, he plays a test match still that ODI looking shape.
-Can play spin & fast good
-who doesn't get away with some bouncers
-Can play in pressure
-Can play with tailenders
-A batsman who not always looks for his own records but only play's for his team ! (Not Kallis :P )
That has to be Dravid and Lara sir. ;)+
ATYs, arre bhai what are you talking about? Sehwag will go the same way? Just because he is an Indian?
C'mon yaar. Don't join the loonies.
just my opinion Afzal. I believe this is a tradition manifested in the Indian team by Ganguly and tendulkar. right now Sehwag is on top of his game, just as Tendi was a few years ago. he can massacre bowlers on form a nd ability alone. there is no doubt there. but as soon as he loses this ability, which he will eventually, you'll see the negative tendencies set in. again, its my opinion but some Indian players will do just about anything to win a game. something i find disgraceful and unsportsmanlike
Abdul Qadir 236
11th April 2005, 21:23
yeah Sachin is thinking too much, he should go out and play his natural game. he still does the business, he is still as good for me, still as good to watch for me (i am a sachin fanatic) but doesnt have the same impact on the game someone of his ability should have. sachin still has this ability ATYS, he just doesnt use it. as for ur final comment, can u explain it more please!
razzler
11th April 2005, 21:26
Playing in pressure and guiding the team to the end is what I measure with and thats where Tendulkar fails.
Dhondy
11th April 2005, 21:26
I fail to see what Sehwag has done to bracket mention with Tendulkar. Or what Tendulkar has done to merit such scorn. He was following his captain's instructions. Knock that *****, if you will.
Anyway, remember Waqar massaging the seam with a bottle cap? Moin shouting desperately at the umpires as the English gathered the winning runs in fading light?
These things are nobody's sole preserve. Sportsmen play to win. It's high stakes all around.
Abdul Qadir 236
11th April 2005, 21:28
as i said razzler, no one has ever performed as well as tendulkar as consistently for as long a period of time.
never mind his genius!!! i will never attack sachin for the failures of others as so many do.
Afzal it shows very little class on your part to defend Sachin's actions by blaming them on the captain or bringing up the mistakes of others. If my captain asked me to put laxative in an Indian player's food I wouldnt do that. a bowler with more integrity and class would not be bowling the way Sachin Tendulkar is. and the fault is all his own and nobody else's.
by the way, if you believe Sachin listens to Ganguly you havent been watching this series. Sachin literally scolded Ganguly on the field and Ganguly took it like a 5 year old. open your eyes my friend.
Abdul Qadir 236
11th April 2005, 21:38
i would like to see sachins bowling - i am vehemently against negative tactics. however he did take 5 wickets in 1 game, he turns ball appreciably and has some good variations so he may have seemed defensive but his deliveries would show attacking bowling. i dont have sony so cant say too much here.
razzler
11th April 2005, 21:40
as i said razzler, no one has ever performed as well as tendulkar as consistently for as long a period of time.
never mind his genius!!! i will never attack sachin for the failures of others as so many do.
Consistency wise he is awesome and I am not denying it but tell me how many match winning test knocks has he played compared to Dravid, Inzi, and Lara. ;)+ I guarantee you that most of his centuries have been in losing causes. [-(
Abdul Qadir 236
11th April 2005, 21:42
if Sachin takes up chess and pulls off a move that puts his opponent in checkmate, i will say thats a matchwinning move!!
however in a team game TEAMS WIN GAMES.
TEAM!!!!!!!!!!
Sachin is 1 man in 11 as Lara is.
i would like to see sachins bowling - i am vehemently against negative tactics. however he did take 5 wickets in 1 game, he turns ball appreciably and has some good variations so he may have seemed defensive but his deliveries would show attacking bowling. i dont have sony so cant say too much here.
just goes to show how little you know about cricket. a leg spinner bowling outside leg stump in the rough, there's not much more to it. it is the most negative tactic you can employ. there is nothing defensive about it. it is a pathetic ploy by a pathetic team and an even more pathetic bowler. disgraceful for cricket all around the world. if you dont have the class to confront a batsman straight up might as well sit your butt at home and watch the game on tv!
Abdul Qadir 236
11th April 2005, 21:44
:)) :)) :)) :)) :)) :)) :))
oh dear. oh dear. oh dear.
yeah I am laughing at tendi as well. it is not only sad but funny to see a player resort to such tactics once he has lost the ability to perform.
razzler
11th April 2005, 21:47
Gary waiting for your answer mate.
Abdul Qadir 236
11th April 2005, 21:48
well i have seen many off spinners bowl to rough outside rhb off stump, no one says a thing!
atys, are u a god or something, who gave u the right to sit and judge who knows what and who has class?
atys, are u a god or something, who gave u the right to sit and judge who knows what and who has class?
:))2
you call sachin a "world class player". does that make you God?? judging people is what we do, as human beings and as internet posters. you need to grow up!
well i have seen many off spinners bowl to rough outside rhb off stump, no one says a thing!
its not the fact that it is in the rough. it is leg stump bowling that you need to concentrate on!
Abdul Qadir 236
11th April 2005, 21:52
u completely sidestepped the point there with all the classic spin of labour lol
i meant people on here not world cricketers.
i meant people on here not world cricketers.
i stand by my comment.
Abdul Qadir 236
11th April 2005, 21:56
at least u have the courage of ur convictions :)
razzler
11th April 2005, 21:59
Gary mate I am waiting for an answer. Will I ever get an answer?
Abdul Qadir 236
11th April 2005, 22:00
to what lol
Hash
11th April 2005, 22:00
gary- I know we rarely see eye to eye and I love debating with you and you do irritate me at times.
But let me say.....you've been back for less than a day and the board has been so alive and kicking. Pakpassion is a better place with you here. I hope you are here to stay.
razzler
11th April 2005, 22:03
as i said razzler, no one has ever performed as well as tendulkar as consistently for as long a period of time.
never mind his genius!!! i will never attack sachin for the failures of others as so many do.
Consistency wise he is awesome and I am not denying it but tell me how many match winning test knocks has he played compared to Dravid, Inzi, and Lara. ;)+ I guarantee you that most of his centuries have been in losing causes. [-(
This above question for you mate? I know you like Sachin but even you have to accept that he crumbles under pressure.
Officer Barbrady
11th April 2005, 22:05
Yes and to add to what Hash said, some friendly advice:
Don't repeat yourself every second post and you don't have to reply to every post on every thread. I see that you have posted already well over a 100 times in 3 hours....that's fine but when you say the same thing in short posts (I tend to agree with some of ur arguments but even then the repetition gets to one) and when people don't agree with it there is bound to be trouble. And then you take things personally resulting in a time out...
Abdul Qadir 236
11th April 2005, 22:06
i only see eye to eye with PPers who i do 2 way webcam chat with lol
well to be honest i dont think i am that important to the site, maybe ur not saying i am! dont think i make PP a better place. i am just 1 poster.
i am like my favourite politician - guess who it is:
u know what ur getting
i am unashamedly ideological
i dont take middle ground often
am not popular
but enough ppl like me
razzler
11th April 2005, 22:11
Gary mate the question is waiting for you to answer.
Abdul Qadir 236
11th April 2005, 22:14
i answered it above.
marooned - thanks but what about Amjid? he is far worse than me lol
Officer Barbrady
11th April 2005, 22:16
Amjid is amjid...
sajjad
11th April 2005, 22:18
Gary,
"being better than the worst doesnt make u good"
now who said that...oh yeah it was me! :D
Abdul Qadir 236
11th April 2005, 22:20
lol a theme i bang on about here on pakpassion :D
sajjad
11th April 2005, 22:21
say what!?
Abdul Qadir 236
11th April 2005, 22:23
ur little quote there.
sajjad
11th April 2005, 22:24
yeah...and i try ti disprove it...but the forces of gravity and evil deny me the possibility of achieving the laurels i so surely deserve
razzler
11th April 2005, 22:27
yeah...and i try ti disprove it...but the forces of gravity and evil deny me the possibility of achieving the laurels i so surely deserve
:O :O This coming from you Sajjad. [-( This has to be plagarism of the highest order.
sajjad
11th April 2005, 22:31
no razzler, miggy gave me full and complete rights to use his words from "the Amazing words of Miggybro"
razzler
11th April 2005, 22:33
So you have Barney's word book hey. That explains it.
sajjad
11th April 2005, 22:37
how else wud i contrive to contribute such contricity so conclusively!
zulfiqar
11th April 2005, 22:59
I'm not a huge tendu fan but that doesn't mean that he's a bad batsman at all.
For anyone that doubts Tendulkar's class or ability to follow the team's demand... watch one of the most devastating games (for me as a Pakistani fan): WC2003 at Tempest. I was about to watch it again yesterday and I just watched until that last ball of Pak innings when Wasim Akram hit a four. I knew that if I kept on going after that... I would begin to cry.
the SHA
11th April 2005, 23:08
Most complete batsman? Well it certainly wasnt Peter Such (http://www.cricinfo.com/link_to_database/PLAYERS/ENG/S/SUCH_PM_01002089/), whose "batting was based around the forward defensive" :)))
Ahh im not gonna be able to sleep tonight with the memory of Peter Such in my head :))
zulfiqar
11th April 2005, 23:20
Tendulkar also has all the shots in the book. I've seen him play every thing. He definitely does fall under the category of choker as WC '03 was a very rare event for him. I remember that before the INdian innings started I told everyone "Don't worry, tenduklar NEVER playys in these situations." N' as they say, the rest is history.
Faisal Akhtar
12th April 2005, 00:02
Cant believe u guys put Ponting in the same category as Inzi, Lara and Tendulkar.
Ponting is a good player, but he isnt complete like the others. He is a very weak offside player, cant cut or drive the ball as good as he plays the pull shot or off his legs.
The others (Lara, Inzi, Tendu) can play every shot in the book. Even Youhana is a more complete batsman than Ponting.
Damien Martin is another over-rated player, strong on the offside but very weak onside.
Australia have many other incomplete batsman but they still end up scoring heavy because of their good tempremants and desire to win.
Out of the three, id say Tendu is(was) the more complete batsman.
Dhondy
13th April 2005, 09:30
stats mean nothing. tendi has the heart of a kitten and the mind of a weasel. so what if he made a couple of tons. the man has no integrity and even less class. he is one of the worse ambassadors for cricket and has been shown up for being just that in the ongoing series against Pakistan.
I am interested in hearing what ATYS has to say about this today. A brilliant innings from the champion, followed by an exemplary show in the field. And I don't know one bowler in world cricket, let alone a part time bowler, who could have held his nerve in the last over against a great batsman like Inzi with 3 runs to play with.
A great, great player.
Abdul Qadir 236
13th April 2005, 09:38
the mark of how great sachin and lara are is that time and time again they come back and prove the critics wrong.
Irshan Khan
25th January 2006, 04:49
no matter how much you try to be nuetral and diplomatic, Indians and PAKs will never be able to get along. Its not just cricket even in FTA or terrorism..whatever. reason....
Bloody nehru and stupid jinnah have already cultivated this hatred since 1947....
this is fate and destiny...cannot change.
I am not making any racist comment here. or even country oriented comments. I am trying to be neutral here.
safehands46
25th January 2006, 05:16
Its a toss up between ponting,inzi, and dravid. these are the most complete. At the moment. They score runs in all kinds of situations in every way fast slow. they have all the correct shots its just a beauty to see them play. Personally, I got give props to all of them but dravid is amazing opening under his current situation.
spindoctor
25th January 2006, 06:47
Dravid and Inzi are the joint winners for me!
Tupac
25th January 2006, 12:02
Sachin Tendulkar
chuck
25th January 2006, 12:11
In my book, Dravid looks the most complete batsman. It's hard to get him out but he cant hit 6s. If we consider this as a weekness then Sachin and Lara are joint first. Sehwag will be running them close and Inzi/Younis will be next.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.