View Full Version : 2010 Asia Cup Pakistan Stats - Batting
Top 3 and Bottom 3 only
The Good
Most Runs scored:
1. Shahid Afridi (265) in 3 innings
2. Umar Akmal (101) in 3 innings
3. Imran Farhat (91) in 2 innings
Highest averages:
1. Shahid Afridi (88.33)
2. Abdul Razzaq (50.00)
3. Imran Farhat (45.50)
Highest Strike Rates:
1. Shahid Afridi (164.59)
2. Abdul Razzaq (106.02)
3. Asad Shafiq (89.47)
The Bad
Least Runs scored:
1. Asad Shafiq (17) in 1 inning
2. Umar Amin (34) in 3 innings
3. Shoaib Malik (47) in 2 innings
Lowest averages:
1. Umar Amin (11.33)
2. Asad Shafiq (17.00)
3. Shoaib Malik (23.50)
Lowest Strike Rates:
1. Umar Amin (57.62)
2. Imran Farhat (73.98)
3. Shoaib Malik (78.33)
PS: only considering recognized batsmen.
Shahid Afridi was the best while Umar Amin was the worst batsman for Pakistan in Asia Cup.
saeed-sohail
21st June 2010, 22:53
Where is butt?
mmkextreme_1
21st June 2010, 22:55
Where is butt?
If he is not up there..then he must have been in the middle rite
SB made 74 runs at an avg. of 37 and a S/R of 43.5
saeed-sohail
21st June 2010, 23:05
That SR doesn't look right.
mmkextreme_1
21st June 2010, 23:07
That SR doesn't look right.
2 innings..first innings was a duck i guess take the second inning strike and add them together and divide by 2
SB made 74 runs at an avg. of 37 and a S/R of 43.5
Salman Butt did not suck that much. :P His S/R was 84.09
he had 0 runs so 0 SR, and 74off 85 which is 87.5
avg. SR would mean we add and divide right? or does a duck not count in SR?
Sledger
21st June 2010, 23:10
Where is butt?
The ugly?
he had 0 runs so 0 SR, and 74off 85 which is 87.5
avg. SR would mean we add and divide right? or does a duck not count in SR?
Strike Rate = (Runs Scored / Balls Faced) * 100
sharam karoo mod banay howay ho aur strike rate calculate kerna nahin ata.
coy0607
21st June 2010, 23:12
he had 0 runs so 0 SR, and 74off 85 which is 87.5
avg. SR would mean we add and divide right? or does a duck not count in SR?
you dont use average for strike rates.......total runs/total ball*100
Ismailtoca
21st June 2010, 23:13
he had 0 runs so 0 SR, and 74off 85 which is 87.5
avg. SR would mean we add and divide right? or does a duck not count in SR?
Strike rate means you add up all the balls faced and all the runs scored, not take the average strike rate :pissed:
If we used ur method Afridi would have a strike rate around 20, as he gets out at 0 alot
Strike Rate = (Runs Scored / Balls Faced) * 100
sharam karoo mod banay howay ho aur strike rate calculate kerna nahin ata.
oops :P
bhuraapey ka assar hai :D
anakin
22nd June 2010, 10:32
oops :P
bhuraapey ka assar hai :D
:))) :)))
*syed59*
22nd June 2010, 10:48
Dont get the point of these stats really. We have all seen the players player out in the middle, which obviously is more important than anything else.
Paradox
22nd June 2010, 10:57
^ Agree with syed.
sakss
22nd June 2010, 11:08
the good thing is we tried out some youngsters and i thnk wv got some good talent in umer amin and asad shafiq....dont consider umer amins stats in the 3 matches....look at his technique.looked quite solod to me...
afridis batting is always a positive...good to see hes performing as a skipper..hope he can carry the same form in england
saeed-sohail
22nd June 2010, 13:14
So malik in good form is still among the worst.
So malik in good form is still among the worst.
correct. Players like Malik are leeches which are sucking the blood out of Pakistan cricket.
A.M.
22nd June 2010, 21:39
Umar Akmal again there in the top3
lol, 3 matches mey se kya analysis karoge?
Afridi was brilliant, the rest were average.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.