User Tag List
Results 1 to 74 of 74
-
31st December 2016, 16:42 #1
Which Test team is better at the moment - England or Australia?
We endlessly debate about who is the better out of India and Pakistan here, but would like to know the opinion of ppers on which team is better of the Ashes rivals - England or Australia.
Looks actually close to me. Hence the thread.
Would like a poll on it if possible.
-
31st December 2016, 16:45 #2
Australia have found a great player in Handscomb. Their middle order and pace attack is stronger. I'll go with Australia.
-
31st December 2016, 16:47 #3
England for me.. Comfortably better batting unit in asia despite whatever results suggest
Don't see Australia drawing series in Bangladesh
-
31st December 2016, 16:47 #4
First Class Star
- Debut
- Dec 2015
- Runs
- 3,235
- Mentioned
- 74 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 2 Thread(s)
Quite a few similarities between the teams right now coming to think of it. Good pace bowling attacks, one pretty solid opener and the other young but promising, one of the best batsmen in the world in the middle order with the rest being a bit undecided at the moment and a pretty average spinner. Only real difference in the structure is a good all rounder with Marsh not quite coming on as he should of yet.
-
31st December 2016, 16:49 #5
Australia need to replace Renshaw with Bancroft. The latter is not ready and Bancroft is the better option, period.
-
31st December 2016, 16:50 #6
Traditional talking point was that Australia are pants in asia while England are better. I'm not sure if they can claim that after failing to win a single game in India and the UAE. You could argue though that England have drawn 2 matches while Australia have folded in all of them.
Australia are more dominant at home (the SA series defeat notwithstanding).
England won in SA, but so did Australia 2 years back.
England drew away with the west indies while Aus destroyed them in the carribean.
So who's better?
-
31st December 2016, 16:57 #7
Local Club Regular
- Debut
- Mar 2016
- Runs
- 943
- Mentioned
- 1 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Australia.
Better pace attack and spinner.
Both teams have a weak middle order.
If they get similar pitches to what England did in India, I see them drawing at least 2 of the 4 matches.
-
31st December 2016, 16:59 #8
First Class Star
- Debut
- Dec 2015
- Runs
- 3,235
- Mentioned
- 74 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 2 Thread(s)
Not going to comment on who I think is better as my bias will show through, but I think the next Ashes series (down under) could be on of the most competitive ones we've had for a while.
-
31st December 2016, 17:01 #9
-
31st December 2016, 17:05 #10
Australia
Kuch to log kahenge
Logon ka kaam hai kehna
-
31st December 2016, 17:15 #11
For all the talk about Aus being poor and Eng doing better in Asia, I would like to see Aus getting the same pitches as Eng got in India. Same for SA when we tour there. Otherwise, we are comparing apple to oranges.
"If this happens I will swim across the Charles River! In winter!" -- OZGOD on NZ batting 6 sessions
-
31st December 2016, 20:25 #12
England.
-
31st December 2016, 20:33 #13
First Class Captain
- Debut
- Apr 2005
- Runs
- 5,126
- Mentioned
- 151 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 3 Thread(s)
England
-
31st December 2016, 20:35 #14
Australia.
Shocking year for England in Tests.
Politics trumps intelligence (pun intended).
-
31st December 2016, 20:38 #15
Australia seem to have a found decent batting lineup all of a sudden whilst England batting is deep but is packed with all rounders and not enough specialists. Anderson seems to be coming to the end, wood can't stay fit and Finn seem to have lost his form. Broad is still good. Starc and Hazelwood are approaching there peaks and bowl well as a pair.
I'll go with Australia just, next year ashes should be good.
-
31st December 2016, 20:51 #16
-
31st December 2016, 20:54 #17
-
31st December 2016, 21:13 #18
T20I Star
- Debut
- Apr 2011
- Venue
- Toronto (Dhaka)
- Runs
- 19,856
- Mentioned
- 1412 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 8 Thread(s)
Poms lost 4-0 in IND, Aussies can do at worst is 4-0 in 4 Test Series.
Poms made 1-1 in Bangladesh, which I think is going to be tougher for us against Starc & Hazlewood
AUS lost 3-0 in SRL, not sure how Poms will do there, but their recent Asian tour suggests, it won't be much better than 0-3
Aussies crashed WI 2-0 & 2-0 both home & away - would have required to bat half innings 3 times out of 4, had they wished; Poms couldn't hang on to 1-0 lead in that 1-1 Series in WI
Poms drew 2-2 against PAK at home, Aussies have so far beaten PAK & weather for a 2-0 lead
Poms managed to draw 1-1 against Kiwis at home, AUS won both series home & away, by clear margin of 2-0 & 2-0
Poms beat an under strength SAF 2-1 in SAF, who later beat AUS 2-1 in AUS - we'll have to wait for SAF's summer tour, before that Poms has slight edge; though Poms lost last home 3 Test Series to SAF 2-0, AUS drew 1-1 in SAF
Poms beat AUS 3-2 at home in last Ashes, Aussies won the previous one 5-0 at home & most likely to repeat again in a years time
In between, Poms managed to win & lose a Series to SRL at home.
I am not sure, how ENG is a better team than NZ or PAK, let alone SAF, IND & AUS - based on their one Series win in SAF?
-
31st December 2016, 21:16 #19
Local Club Regular
- Debut
- Mar 2016
- Runs
- 943
- Mentioned
- 1 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
^^ that's because England are incredibly overrated thanks to their media.
ICC test team of the year had 4(!) English players and most people on PP have 3 in their best xi for 2016.
-
31st December 2016, 21:20 #20
First Class Star
- Debut
- Dec 2015
- Runs
- 3,235
- Mentioned
- 74 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 2 Thread(s)
-
31st December 2016, 21:22 #21
First Class Star
- Debut
- Dec 2015
- Runs
- 3,235
- Mentioned
- 74 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 2 Thread(s)
-
31st December 2016, 21:25 #22
England beating weak SA excuse is getting too predictable and frankly boring..
If Eng were to play SA right now, it would be 50-50 for me regardless of the venue. Eng has pace attack and ridiculous batting depth to succeed against SA. And they have found a wonderful prospect in Hameed.
Eng's recent performance in India shouldn't be considered as I see no team beating India at home any time soon.Last edited by Chrish; 31st December 2016 at 21:26.
-
31st December 2016, 21:29 #23
Local Club Star
- Debut
- Jan 2014
- Venue
- Deen Over Dunya
- Runs
- 1,619
- Mentioned
- 29 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
I think its pretty clear that there is very little seperating the top 9 sides in world cricket in either Tests or ODIs. Or at the very least you have the top 5 and the next 4. All teams play well at home, and get totally outclassed overseas with very few exceptions. Its probably due to the fact that teams travel too much these days and also due to how much technical assistance there is that home teams can exploit even minimal weaknesses in touring sides to exact maxmimal advantage.
-
31st December 2016, 21:30 #24
Local Club Regular
- Debut
- Mar 2016
- Runs
- 943
- Mentioned
- 1 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
-
31st December 2016, 21:40 #25
First Class Star
- Debut
- Dec 2015
- Runs
- 3,235
- Mentioned
- 74 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 2 Thread(s)
And do you have any suggestions for which opener should've replaced Cook?
No way De Kock could be justified over Bairstow with him having only 4 games in the period (all at home) in which Bairstow did the most part of breaking the record of the most runs and dismissals by a keeper in a year.Last edited by HitWicket; 31st December 2016 at 21:41.
-
31st December 2016, 21:48 #26
T20I Star
- Debut
- Apr 2011
- Venue
- Toronto (Dhaka)
- Runs
- 19,856
- Mentioned
- 1412 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 8 Thread(s)
Then take the last 1 month - ENG has lost 4 in a row with 2 innings defeats; AUS has won 3 in a row with the last one by innings to a side that beat ENG 2-0 at home & drew 2-2 in ENG.
I am not sure which cut off makes ENG better team - may be just from the start of SAF-ENG Series
-
31st December 2016, 21:54 #27
Local Club Regular
- Debut
- Mar 2016
- Runs
- 943
- Mentioned
- 1 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Are we talking about ICC period or 2016 now?
ICC period - opener Warner (dominated at home and top scored for the Aussies in 3 of their 6 innings in SL).
2016 - Braithwaite.
English players are always going to win the aggregate records given how many tests they play.
As for wicketkeepers, Bairstow wins the ICC spot by default (given as you say, QdK's injury in second half of 2015) but not for calendar year 2016.
-
31st December 2016, 22:00 #28
First Class Star
- Debut
- Dec 2015
- Runs
- 3,235
- Mentioned
- 74 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 2 Thread(s)
-
31st December 2016, 22:03 #29
Test Match Star
- Debut
- Aug 2010
- Venue
- Sheffield
- Runs
- 27,276
- Mentioned
- 850 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 12 Thread(s)
I'd say England have the advantage in their openers (Cook and Hameed) and in the #6 position with Stokes. They have the better wicket-keeper batsman by far.
The other departments I'd hand the advantage to Australia. The new ball pair of Starc and Hazlewood is world class whereas it seems Anderson is on his last legs and Broad has picked up a few injuries recently. Yet that being said, Australia are very vulnerable in seaming and swinging conditions. I think England would've put up a slightly better fight on those Sri Lankan turners.
England need to go back to first principles. Pick your best 5 batsmen, your primary AR, keeper and your best four bowlers. England ironically have the opposite problem as us in that they lack a grinder in their middle order.
Losing Trott was a bigger blow than people imagined. They've so prone to collapses and there's been too much irresponsible strokeplay recently.
-
31st December 2016, 22:09 #30
First Class Captain
- Debut
- Apr 2005
- Runs
- 5,126
- Mentioned
- 151 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 3 Thread(s)
-
31st December 2016, 22:48 #31
T20I Debutant
- Debut
- Jan 2005
- Runs
- 7,630
- Mentioned
- 14 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Aus batting is 2 men army at moment (Smith & Warner ) & add Usman if they are playing Aus, Aus is struggling with number 6 and wicket keeper (for batting point of view) at moment. both positions are very important now a days .
Eng have better combination for pitches in England & Australia. so they are just ahead
-
1st January 2017, 01:35 #32
Local Club Regular
- Debut
- Nov 2015
- Runs
- 717
- Mentioned
- 5 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 1 Thread(s)
There's still some doubts whether England has the bowlers to win in Australia. Anywhere else they are the better team.
-
1st January 2017, 01:56 #33
ODI Debutant
- Debut
- Dec 2011
- Runs
- 11,564
- Mentioned
- 631 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 2 Thread(s)
Australia. I rate their attack - Bird/Haze/Starc comfortably ahead of England's and Smith and Warner are world class.
'There's a lady who's sure all that glitters is gold'
-
1st January 2017, 01:59 #34
First Class Star
- Debut
- Jun 2011
- Runs
- 3,588
- Mentioned
- 11 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
-
1st January 2017, 02:14 #35
First Class Captain
- Debut
- Dec 2013
- Runs
- 4,355
- Mentioned
- 16 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
England
And quite comfortably also
Aus have been getting hammered away and recently at home by SA
When they tour India, it will be another 4-0
England might not be winning, but still.
-
1st January 2017, 02:17 #36
ODI Debutant
- Debut
- Dec 2011
- Runs
- 11,564
- Mentioned
- 631 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 2 Thread(s)
-
1st January 2017, 02:23 #37
First Class Captain
- Debut
- Oct 2015
- Venue
- Mountains
- Runs
- 4,917
- Mentioned
- 348 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 1 Thread(s)
England is declining. Their bowlers are not what they used to be a couple of years ago, and even batting looks weak.
-
1st January 2017, 02:53 #38
Australia is ahead only on flat pitches because Warner would fire. Otherwise, England is ahead due.
“I've never lost a game I just ran out of time.” Micheal Jordan
-
1st January 2017, 05:33 #39
England have busts of mental frailty. Brilliant and resilient one moment, mediocre the next.
Australia on the other hand are a side dependent on conditions. If the ball is moving in either direction be it swing, seam movement or spin you could swear they've never handled the willow before.
It's a tough one, it's hard to rate inconsistency or mediocrity.
-
1st January 2017, 05:34 #40
England.
Australia have the better pacers.
England have the better spinners.
England have the better batsman.
-
1st January 2017, 05:36 #41
Can we consider Bangladesh as the fulcrum here? England drew 1-1 out there, but Australia would most likely get whitewashed.
-
1st January 2017, 05:46 #42
First Class Captain
- Debut
- Apr 2005
- Runs
- 5,126
- Mentioned
- 151 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 3 Thread(s)
-
1st January 2017, 05:54 #43
-
1st January 2017, 05:57 #44
First Class Captain
- Debut
- Apr 2005
- Runs
- 5,126
- Mentioned
- 151 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 3 Thread(s)
-
1st January 2017, 06:07 #45
Tape Ball Captain
- Debut
- Apr 2011
- Runs
- 1,895
- Mentioned
- 23 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
-
1st January 2017, 06:20 #46
-
1st January 2017, 06:28 #47
First Class Captain
- Debut
- Apr 2005
- Runs
- 5,126
- Mentioned
- 151 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 3 Thread(s)
-
1st January 2017, 06:32 #48
Why has O'Keefe never really been given a go despite his numbers in FC?
-
1st January 2017, 06:59 #49
-
1st January 2017, 07:13 #50
First Class Captain
- Debut
- Apr 2005
- Runs
- 5,126
- Mentioned
- 151 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 3 Thread(s)
-
1st January 2017, 09:22 #51
-
1st January 2017, 12:46 #52
Here is all spinners away in the last 2 years.
"If this happens I will swim across the Charles River! In winter!" -- OZGOD on NZ batting 6 sessions
-
1st January 2017, 12:51 #53
-
1st January 2017, 13:03 #54
Australia don't think they will be defeated twice by an innings after putting up a 400 plus score on non-rank turners.
Also Warner and Smith(combination) are better than Cook and Root atm as both of them have an impact on the match.Pace wise without Wood England is below Aus,Lyon better than Rashid.
Aus doesn't have Stokes or Bairstow though and both are very good but not enough.
In cricket, my superhero is Sachin Tendulkar. He has always been my hero.
-Virat Kohli
-
1st January 2017, 13:14 #55
Originally Posted by Saqs on Steve Smith
-
1st January 2017, 13:33 #56
-
1st January 2017, 13:39 #57
1. Getting rid of oldies
2. Not just picking someone like Maxwell because "he must be good against spin and his bowling will be useful"
3. And based on what they have said in public they acknowledge that they may need to do a horses for course policy selection in batting rather than sticking with players who clearly can't play spin at all just because they scored in Australia.
we'll still get whitewashed by India though
Originally Posted by Saqs on Steve Smith
-
1st January 2017, 13:49 #58
Local Club Regular
- Debut
- Nov 2011
- Runs
- 864
- Mentioned
- 14 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Australia performance will depend upon the type of pitches , if we gave them flat ones like recent England series then Australia will draw and can even win as Starc and co are good in reverse . Starc was very good in Lanka .
-
1st January 2017, 15:52 #59
-
1st January 2017, 15:57 #60
Aussie selectors and fans only seem to care about wrist spinners thus guys like Lyon get bottom of barrel treatment
-
1st January 2017, 17:22 #61
Local Club Regular
- Debut
- Mar 2016
- Runs
- 943
- Mentioned
- 1 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
I thought ICC had picked Azhar Ali and Cook as their two openers, but that was an incorrect assumption.
Given ICC period and applying normal rationale with some minimum number of tests, I will agree with you about Cook as the second opener.
That said, ICC did pick Steyn with just 3 tests in their own review period so screw that, it is QdK over Bairstow and Azhar/Rahul over Cook
-
1st January 2017, 18:59 #62
Local Club Regular
- Debut
- Dec 2016
- Venue
- New York
- Runs
- 953
- Mentioned
- 19 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
England at this very moment. But they are on a downward trajectory and Aus are improving. In the Ashes series a year from now, I expect Aus to win narrowly, say something like 2-1.
-
1st January 2017, 19:03 #63
I don't think either of them are particularly great at the moment. England holds the Ashes and also won away in SA which was a seriously impressive performance over 4 Tests, but then there are the horrible performances in Asia and the failure to beat Pakistan in their own conditions. Australia seems to blow similarly hot and cold. Probably equally mediocre at the moment.
-
1st January 2017, 19:12 #64
Time Pass Post of the Week Winner
- Debut
- Jan 2001
- Runs
- 8,304
- Mentioned
- 13 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 1 Thread(s)
Australia play the bounce well but they have struggled against the moving ball over the last few years. But in Australian conditions, there does not tend to be too much seam movement.
England on the other hand do seem to struggle when their pace bowlers are not getting much from the surface. Nasser Hussain went so far to label them as a bit of one-dimensional team.
Given the above and that the next Ashes series is in Australia, that might give the Australians a bit of an advantage as we stand at the moment.
-
20th March 2017, 14:42 #65
Australia, comfortably.
A skilled hawk conceals its talons.
-
20th March 2017, 14:58 #66
T20I Debutant
- Debut
- Sep 2015
- Runs
- 6,700
- Mentioned
- 45 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Australia have series wins in SA, NZ and WI. Won 2 matches in England and already 1 in India.
Eng have series wins in SA and WI and drew in NZ. Didnt won any in Australia and India.
It's quite clear here.
However, during early part of 2010s, England were superior test team having won series in Australia and India both.
-
20th March 2017, 22:25 #67
I'll go with Australia
-
20th March 2017, 22:36 #68
Australia. England is behind India, Australia, South Africa, NZ, and Pakistan.
-
21st March 2017, 05:48 #69
First Class Star
- Debut
- Dec 2015
- Runs
- 3,235
- Mentioned
- 74 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 2 Thread(s)
-
22nd March 2017, 19:49 #70
England lost a match in Bangladesh and almost lost the first one. Was hammered in India, humiliated in the UAE, could not win a series against aging batting line-up of Pakistan in their own backyard. The win against SA was a fluke and mostly due to the beating that SA received in India.
India, Australia, SA, and NZ have all better W/L ratio than England in the last 12 months. Only Pakistan is worse but then Pakistan won a series at home against England and drew a series in England. So, overall Pakistan has been better.
-
22nd March 2017, 19:51 #71
Local Club Regular
- Debut
- Mar 2017
- Runs
- 685
- Mentioned
- 38 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
-
22nd March 2017, 20:03 #72
First Class Star
- Debut
- Dec 2015
- Runs
- 3,235
- Mentioned
- 74 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 2 Thread(s)
Right, the series win in South Africa was a 'fluke'... Guess we'll see in the upcoming series.
How many of the teams you've listed have played more half their games in the last 12 months in conditions they're inexperienced in that would be considered unfavorable for the respective teams (In Englands case Asia).
-
22nd March 2017, 20:06 #73
Nobody has played more games in Asia than England recently. Still the only test they could win was against Bangladesh and that too was very close. Even, if I do not go by results, England has shown no improvement in any aspect of their game despite fielding a younger team.
-
22nd March 2017, 20:44 #74
australia better based on what exactly ?