User Tag List
Results 1 to 46 of 46
-
8th April 2021, 14:06 #1
Tape Ball Regular
- Debut
- Jul 2019
- Venue
- India
- Runs
- 592
- Mentioned
- 7 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
An opening combination of Sharjeel Khan and Fakhar Zaman in T20Is
Both are the best hitters (in Pak), and can take the game away from the opposition if they click.
It can also backfire badly, since they both play a high risk game.
Let's see if they can make it a possibility
This will be the batting
Stats
Sharjeel Khan, 24.0 @ 137.4
Fakhar Zaman, 22.1 @ 134.1
Babar Azam, 48.0 @ 130.3
Md Hafeez, 28.0 @ 121.3 (6th bowler)
Md Rizwan, 31.9 @ 120.6
Haider Ali, 24.7 @ 137.0
Md Nawaz
Hassan Ali
Usman Qadir
Shaheen Afridi
Haris Rauf
* Hafeez and Rizwan have been in brilliant form recently than what the stats suggest
This line up can score 175+, and it's upto the bowling to defend it
-
8th April 2021, 14:15 #2
Local Club Regular
- Debut
- Jun 2019
- Runs
- 1,307
- Mentioned
- 12 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Rizwan has been in supreme form at top of the order so cannot see him move and he shldnt move
Babar is wasted below no3 ...
so cant see Fakhar and Sharjeel fitting together but the idea of them 2 opening is mouth-watering
if it has to happen
1)Fakhar
2)Sharjeel
3)Babar
4)Rizwan
5)Haffez
6)Haider
7)Faheem
8)Nawaz
9)Hassan
10)Usman
11)Hussnain
I would rest SSA for sure ....
-
8th April 2021, 14:31 #3
First Class Player
- Debut
- Jul 2009
- Venue
- Bury
- Runs
- 2,892
- Mentioned
- 10 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 1 Thread(s)
Surely a time has to come sooner rather than later that Babar and SSA are rested from T20’s. Most teams use T20’s to experiment with fringe players. Needlessly grinding down our best players.
-
8th April 2021, 14:37 #4
Local Club Captain
- Debut
- Jun 2017
- Runs
- 2,296
- Mentioned
- 69 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
I said this yesterday...i think we should try that combo in 2020s...i cant see them both fitting in middle overs. Atleast we will be guaranteed a fast start
-
8th April 2021, 14:38 #5
Debutant
- Debut
- Jan 2021
- Runs
- 179
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
-
8th April 2021, 14:43 #6
Tape Ball Regular
- Debut
- Jul 2019
- Venue
- India
- Runs
- 592
- Mentioned
- 7 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
3 hitters in Sharjeel, Fakhar and Haider
2 who can hold the innings/ hit as per the situation in Hafeez and Rizwan
1 who can make sure to play 20 overs in Babar
1 AR in Nawaz
2 just to add depth to the batting in Hassan and Usman Qadir
5 genuine wicket taking options + Hafeez
-
8th April 2021, 15:14 #7
Debutant
- Debut
- Sep 2016
- Venue
- Newcastle upon Tyne
- Runs
- 72
- Mentioned
- 2 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Where’s Imad Wasim gone?
Surely he’s a better option that nawaz.
-
8th April 2021, 15:48 #8
As much as I would like to see this since you can get the best out of both players this way; it creates a real conundrum for Pakistan. Because Rizwan has been doing amazingly as opener and can't be removed from that spot. Plus if you play both Sharjeel and Fakhar (even if it isn't as opener) which numbers do Babar and Hafeez play at?
The only way I see it is Sharjeel either plays at 6 or sits on the bench because Rizwan and Fakhar have earned their chances more than he has. If the series is won and they want to give other guys a chance than you can rest Fakhar.
-
8th April 2021, 15:57 #9
First Class Star
- Debut
- Feb 2005
- Runs
- 3,381
- Mentioned
- 62 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Why not play Sharjeel down the order , to give you some firepower and big hitting near the end of innings
-
8th April 2021, 16:01 #10
Tape Ball Star
- Debut
- Mar 2019
- Venue
- Islamabad
- Runs
- 755
- Mentioned
- 25 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Bro both of these players will definitely play not only the t20 series vs SA they will also play all matches vs Zim as well, Pakistan don't care about trying new combinations for the ultimate prize their management & captain is always afraid of what will happen if they loose that particular game vs a smaller opponent.
-
-
8th April 2021, 16:20 #11
Senior Test Player
- Debut
- Feb 2005
- Venue
- Cybertron, Guest of Optimus Prime
- Runs
- 25,483
- Mentioned
- 208 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 3 Thread(s)
and who's fault is that? fans like the ones on PP who start slitting their wrists at the first sign of trouble. The wider public is similar. No patience or understanding that in a game you can lose.
Coming back tot eh OP, with these two we can easily be 100-0 in 7 overs or 10-2 in two overs..thats what you'll risk with both of them. It should come off in t20's most days but when you face a top quality bowling attack it may not so dont start moaning when they both get out cheaply at times.
-
8th April 2021, 16:31 #12
You lose an important aspect of T20 cricket with both in tandem. Strike rotation and accumulation.
I know they can accelerate and I know they can take the game away from the opponent but when they don't, they're relying on bad balls to score unlike an accumulator. Sharjeel is a hack IMO and shouldn't be anywhere near the NT on leg-side hitting.
Rizwan at the top of the order is a better foil for Fakhar who needs to improve his non-power game.
-
8th April 2021, 16:35 #13
Tape Ball Regular
- Debut
- Sep 2020
- Venue
- Dubai, Lahore
- Runs
- 373
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Though it sound gr8 if both click but may one of them needs to move down the order to keep left/right combo, I think both struggle against offiess. so may left/right combo way to go,
But it will be gr8 fund if both open in both clicks...
-
8th April 2021, 16:37 #14
Tape Ball Regular
- Debut
- Sep 2020
- Venue
- Dubai, Lahore
- Runs
- 373
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
-
8th April 2021, 16:40 #15
Tape Ball Regular
- Debut
- Sep 2020
- Venue
- Dubai, Lahore
- Runs
- 373
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
-
8th April 2021, 16:41 #16
Tape Ball Regular
- Debut
- Sep 2020
- Venue
- Dubai, Lahore
- Runs
- 373
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
-
8th April 2021, 16:43 #17
Tape Ball Regular
- Debut
- Sep 2020
- Venue
- Dubai, Lahore
- Runs
- 373
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
-
8th April 2021, 17:02 #18
Local Club Regular
- Debut
- Oct 2013
- Runs
- 1,352
- Mentioned
- 19 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
We cannot slot Rizwan into the middle order. If Fakhar and Sharjeel open in T20Is, then I'll play Azam in place of Rizwan.
1- Sharjeel
2- Fakhar
3- Babar
4- Hafeez
5- Azam
6- Haider
7- Imad
8- Hasan
9- Qadir
10- Haris
11- Shaheen
-
8th April 2021, 17:07 #19
I really like your team. I also like the fact that you have excluded good for nothing Faheem from the XI. Faheem will neither score a 25 ball 50, nor will he take a 4 wicket haul, as such he was just wasting a spot.
The lower batting order does look a bit thin with Hassan Ali at no.8, but hey if our top 7 batsmen can help us make a big score then we probably dont deserve to win anyway.
-
8th April 2021, 17:19 #20
I think it is extremely unlikely that Sharjeel gets selected in the playing XI.
Misbah clearly did not want Sharjeel back in the squad and it was M. Wasim’s decision.
The fact that Fakhar was quickly added to the T20I squad after his 193 shows that Misbah is looking for an excuse to keep Sharjeel on the sidelines.
I cannot prove this but I believe that considering M. Wasim’s ego and how he wants to prove himself as some visionary genius, he would have resisted the urge of including Fakhar in the T20I squad just to prove that he was right to exclude him in the first place.
I believe some arm-twisting by Misbah is the reason why Fakhar was added to the T20I squad.
Considering his current form and the way he is playing in South African conditions, Fakhar will definitely play in the T20I series.
Moreover, Rizwan will continue to open based on his recent opening form in the format and also because he looked very uncomfortable in the middle-order in the ODI series.
This means that we will have Fakhar and Rizwan opening with Babar at 3.
The only way Sharjeel plays is if Babar opposes Misbah for a change. So far, Babar has proved to be a dummy captain with Misbah calling the shots and making the major decisions.
Babar wants Sharjeel in the team because of the Karachi Kings connection but he will have to stand up to Misbah for once to force him into the playing XI.
-
-
8th April 2021, 19:28 #21
Wasim said exactly this in his interview. Sharjeel and Fakhar were selected due to Babar's request; however, they were split up between the two squads because it didn't make sense to have 5 openers in the squad.
Initially, Wasim's plan must have been to open with Babar and Rizwan with Haider at #3; however, Babar probably wanted Sharjeel while Misbah wanted Fakhar.
More likely than not, Fakhar will probably get the nod to open with Babar along with Rizwan and Haider to follow.
-
8th April 2021, 19:45 #22
No harm in trying it out. These are dummy games, we need to focus on the bigger picture. Unfortunately, Rizwan can't succeed in T20's anywhere besides opening
Full credit to Micky Arthur for realizing Babar Azam was born to bat at 3 in all formats.
-
8th April 2021, 22:23 #23
Local Club Captain
- Debut
- Jun 2017
- Runs
- 2,309
- Mentioned
- 28 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 1 Thread(s)
Can Fakhar be that guy we need as a late order hitter during the t20s?
Given the shortage of lower order hitters in Pakistan and with the t20 WC around the corner it's made me think that given Fakhar's recent form could we ask him to play a lower order hitter role?
1. Sharjeel
2. Rizwan (wk)
3. Babar (c)
4. Hafeez
5. Haider Ali
6. Fakhar Zaman
7. Muhammad Nawaz/Imad Wasim
8. Faheem Ashraf
9. Hassan Ali
10. Shaheen Afridi
11. Haris Rauf
-
8th April 2021, 22:33 #24
He will be used as an opener. I think if you wanted to use him in the middle order it should be at 3 or 4. I think Fakhar needs a bit of time to get going . Don’t think he is someone who hits 6s straight away like a Russell or Pollard.
But I’m sure the plan is for him to open.
-
8th April 2021, 22:49 #25
Local Club Captain
- Debut
- Jun 2017
- Runs
- 2,309
- Mentioned
- 28 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 1 Thread(s)
-
8th April 2021, 23:10 #26
Debutant
- Debut
- Jun 2017
- Runs
- 166
- Mentioned
- 31 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
I think the management is very set on playing batsmen at their proper position so don't think they would do this but one of Sharjeel and Fakhar needs to play down the order. Fakhar since he is in form and seems like he needs that bit of extra time to get his eye set before hitting out, I would open with him.
Fakhar
Rizwan
Babar
Hafeez
Haider
Sharjeel
Faheem
Hasan
Qadir
Shaheen
Haris
The other option is to bench Sharjeel and play nawaz at that position.
-
8th April 2021, 23:14 #27
Local Club Captain
- Debut
- Jun 2017
- Runs
- 2,309
- Mentioned
- 28 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 1 Thread(s)
-
8th April 2021, 23:15 #28
Tape Ball Star
- Debut
- Jul 2007
- Venue
- Dubai
- Runs
- 972
- Mentioned
- 3 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
-
8th April 2021, 23:18 #29
Fakhar
Sharjeel
Babaar
Haider
Rizwan
Faheem
This should be ideal batting order for 20 20 WC
-
8th April 2021, 23:58 #30
Go into the first three games with the normal setup (maybe Babar dropping down to accomodate Sharjeel).
In the fourth one, if we've already won the series, try as many different combinations as possible. Change the bowlers, middle order, and whatever else is needed. Interchange Zahid and Usman to see how both perform.
-
-
9th April 2021, 00:11 #31
Considering both Sharjeel and Fakhar are in the squad, it will be surprising if Babar and Rizwan still open.
Arsenal all the way!! (and Pakistan, of course!)
-
9th April 2021, 01:19 #32
Rizwan is not a good enough t20 batsman. It's wiser to use him as a specialist keeper batting at 8 who can be promoted if there is a collapse or if there is a rank turner (like the one against India in 2016 WC).
I think this is the best we can come up with in T20Is,
Sharjeel
Babar
Fakhar
Hafeez
Haider
Imad
Hassan
Rizwan
Qadir
Shaheen
Harris/Hasnain
-
9th April 2021, 01:34 #33
Local Club Captain
- Debut
- Jun 2017
- Runs
- 2,309
- Mentioned
- 28 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 1 Thread(s)
Given Rizwan's stability with the bat, he would be suited at the opening position and i would open with Sharjeel with Babar coming one down. Rizwan would be wasted at the lower order spot in my view and i think for now have Fakhar be our late order hitter, with management giving him a license to thrill.
-
9th April 2021, 04:57 #34
Local Club Regular
- Debut
- May 2016
- Runs
- 1,418
- Mentioned
- 11 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Seeing powerhouse lineups from England, I think it makes sense to try it out.
Rizwan had some awesome T20 games but I don't really like him all that much as an opener. The powerplay is where I think Pakistan needs to explode like a lot of other teams do and Fakhar/Sharjeel up top can do exactly that. Babar/Hafeez at 3-4 provide reliability and Hafeez can accelerate as well. Rizwan at 5 just in case of a collapse fits more at that position and the #6 can go to a power hitter like Haider or possibly Imad if you're opting for 6 bowlers. 6 bowlers in T20 would make a lot of sense I think.
-
9th April 2021, 12:23 #35
-
9th April 2021, 14:41 #36
-
9th April 2021, 14:58 #37
Tape Ball Captain
- Debut
- Mar 2014
- Runs
- 1,041
- Mentioned
- 44 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Would love to see Fakhar and Sharjeel opening!!
-
9th April 2021, 15:16 #38
Debutant
- Debut
- Sep 2019
- Runs
- 85
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Would much rather see Rizwan and Fakhar rather than Sharjeel. TBH I'd rather see Hasnain and Shaheen opening. it's a disgrace that this match fixer - the man who threw away all pride and honour playing for his country just for a few dollars, gets another chance in represent the country which he betrayed. Did we not learn our lesson from Amir? These match fixers don't care about pride or honour, they do not change, the will always be crooks
Plus he isn't even the explosive opener you think he is. Anyone who followed the PSl could clearly see that he was a sitting wicket against the moving ball. Before his ban he was a duck against the spinning. Nothing has changed. His fitness is also disgustingly atrocious, so if he does fluke any runs, count on him balancing those runs with his misfields and slow running
-
9th April 2021, 15:39 #39
Senior Test Player
- Debut
- Feb 2005
- Venue
- Cybertron, Guest of Optimus Prime
- Runs
- 25,483
- Mentioned
- 208 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 3 Thread(s)
totally agree. I would rather see fakhar and rizwan or Fakhar and babar with rizwan at one down. I just cant imagine seeing moata back with his giant flab of fat in a green shirt again.
The problem is fakhar can get out cheaply. Its part of his game and he does have the tendency to get cramped outside his off stump. Good attacks will study him more now. So we need a more orthodox-ish batsman at the other end to get us a decent score in t20's.
fakhar
rizwan
babar
hafeez
Haider Ali
faheem
that is a decent t20 top order in my book.
-
9th April 2021, 15:45 #40
Debutant
- Debut
- Apr 2021
- Runs
- 21
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Fakhar
Babar
Sharjeel
Rizwan
Hafeez
This would be my top 5
-
-
9th April 2021, 19:20 #41
Local Club Captain
- Debut
- Jun 2017
- Runs
- 2,309
- Mentioned
- 28 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 1 Thread(s)
-
9th April 2021, 19:21 #42
-
9th April 2021, 19:23 #43
Local Club Captain
- Debut
- Jun 2017
- Runs
- 2,309
- Mentioned
- 28 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 1 Thread(s)
-
9th April 2021, 19:25 #44
-
9th April 2021, 20:06 #45
Local Club Captain
- Debut
- Jun 2017
- Runs
- 2,309
- Mentioned
- 28 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 1 Thread(s)
-
10th April 2021, 06:44 #46
ODI Debutant
- Debut
- Feb 2019
- Runs
- 8,854
- Mentioned
- 50 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
I think we should try sharjeel and fakhar for the south africa series becouse its a weeker south african team but i think they will go with rizwan and fakhar due to form.
Sharjeel
Fakhar
Babar
Hafeez
Rizwan
Haider