User Name Password
Go Back   PakPassion - Pakistan Cricket Forum > Sport > Cricket


Share This Forum!  
 
 
     
 
 
View Poll Results: The best-performing Asian team at the WC so far?
Bangladesh 11 8.03%
India 25 18.25%
Pakistan 74 54.01%
Sri Lanka 27 19.71%
Voters: 137. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 14th March 2011, 18:13
Dr Khan Dr Khan is offline
First Class Player
 
Debut: Jan 2010
Venue: Connecticut USA
Runs: 3,123
Subcontinental Teams: Who has Played Better So Far?

Teams from Subcontinent have failed to impress so far in the early couple of weeks of WC. India, Pakistan, SL and Bangladesh have all looked below par. The spinners have failed to make a mark and all the teams are struggling with their combination. Which team do you think will go the longest distance in this competition?

For me SL and Pakistan look better sides because their bowling attacks are more balanced. India has once again disappointed. Their bowling is a big concern. BD will be luck to quilify for QF and dont see them making any further progress.

What do you think?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 14th March 2011, 18:16
ZenBowman's Avatar
ZenBowman ZenBowman is offline
Local Club Captain
 
Debut: Feb 2011
Runs: 2,229
What is really surprising to me is that the spinners from subcontinent teams have not made a mark (apart from Afridi), while spinners from other teams are doing quite well...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14th March 2011, 18:17
Afridi_Fan's Avatar
Afridi_Fan Afridi_Fan is offline
T20I Captain
 
Debut: Mar 2006
Venue: Lala Land - The President.
Runs: 41,405
I think SL has been the best so far, even in that defeat to Pakistan they came close to us. Where as we are thrashed by NZL.

There is no need to discuss India in this thread.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14th March 2011, 18:17
AZ's Avatar
AZ AZ is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Debut: Dec 2008
Venue: UAE
Runs: 57,230
a very good question.

I think its between us & SL, we have shown quality in both disciplines so far.

and since we beat them, I'll go for Pak
__________________
Proud Shehri of Misbah Ka Pakistan
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14th March 2011, 18:18
Shaq_oneal Shaq_oneal is offline
Junior Player
 
Debut: Mar 2011
Venue: Land of the free - USA
Runs: 53
BD will be out in group stages.. Ind & Pak qualify for SF,, dont see both of them beating Aus/SA.

SL looks good to me to go all the way to the finals
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14th March 2011, 18:19
Hando's Avatar
Hando Hando is offline
Local Club Captain
 
Debut: Jan 2011
Runs: 2,339
India
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14th March 2011, 18:20
kkmix kkmix is offline
Test Match Debutant
 
Debut: Jan 2006
Runs: 13,347
Bangladesh without a doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 14th March 2011, 18:20
asad100101 asad100101 is offline
Local Club Regular
 
Debut: Nov 2007
Runs: 863
I think Indian batting is rock solid consistently scored 300. Indian bowling can be handful on a given day if pitch conditions favor them. No team has played exceptionally well but still Indian is hot favorites on their ground. Will go for semis atleast
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 14th March 2011, 18:20
ads101's Avatar
ads101 ads101 is offline
ODI Debutant
 
Debut: Dec 2009
Runs: 9,566
India
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 14th March 2011, 18:24
cricketindiafan's Avatar
cricketindiafan cricketindiafan is offline
First Class Star
 
Debut: Feb 2010
Runs: 4,091
Group A has been disappointing so far. Koi to ek close game hone do udhar

Group B is where the "Box Office" has been as David Gower keeps calling it.

Jokes apart, as the OP says, all the sub continental teams are still undecided about their final combination. SL cannot seem to decide whom to play in their middle order or who their 2nd pacer and 2nd spinner should be. Pakistan too have had issues with their pacers and I have a feeling even the openers may get changed come the knock outs.

India, well quite disappointing especially Dhoni's leadership. Somehow he hasn't been his usual attacking self either with the bat, with his field placements or even the bowling combinations.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 14th March 2011, 18:24
Dr Khan Dr Khan is offline
First Class Player
 
Debut: Jan 2010
Venue: Connecticut USA
Runs: 3,123
What happened to the Spin factory in India. How come we don't see any quality spinners from them?? May be Indian PPers can elaborate.

Also I think IPL has done harm to India cricket, as we can witness. All they are producing are T20 style batsmen, with no quality fast bowler or spinner.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 14th March 2011, 18:25
james_bond james_bond is offline
Local Club Star
 
Debut: Apr 2008
Runs: 1,540
Neither.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 14th March 2011, 18:25
w8in_4_0402's Avatar
w8in_4_0402 w8in_4_0402 is offline
T20I Debutant
 
Debut: Jan 2011
Runs: 6,745
Imran Tahir is from the Sub-Continent
__________________
'If you cant support us when we lose or draw then dont support us when we win"
Bill Shankly
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 14th March 2011, 18:26
Shaq_oneal Shaq_oneal is offline
Junior Player
 
Debut: Mar 2011
Venue: Land of the free - USA
Runs: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Khan
What happened to the Spin factory in India. How come we don't see any quality spinners from them?? May be Indian PPers can elaborate.

Also I think IPL has done harm to India cricket, as we can witness. All they are producing are T20 style batsmen, with no quality fast bowler or spinner.
I think I will have to agree with you.. the focus is shifting to containing runs than take wickets, and thats backfiring on team strategy
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 14th March 2011, 18:28
ZenBowman's Avatar
ZenBowman ZenBowman is offline
Local Club Captain
 
Debut: Feb 2011
Runs: 2,229
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Khan
What happened to the Spin factory in India. How come we don't see any quality spinners from them?? May be Indian PPers can elaborate.

Also I think IPL has done harm to India cricket, as we can witness. All they are producing are T20 style batsmen, with no quality fast bowler or spinner.
They are producing good batsmen, but the bowlers are definitely T20 style lafangas.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 14th March 2011, 18:30
IMMY69's Avatar
IMMY69 IMMY69 is offline
T20I Debutant
 
Debut: Feb 2005
Runs: 8,002
India have played on extremely flat tracks which have made their batsmen, at times, look like demons (apart from the collapse against the Saffies) but their bowling has also been woefully exposed.

Both Sri Lanka and Pakistan have played on tougher wickets. The colombo track has offered more turn then any of the Indian wickets and this wicket in Kandy has done the lot! Bounce, swong, seam and some spin too!! So although the batting has struggled at times I think both Sri Lanka and Pakistan have shown they are stronger allround teams.

Not much to choose between Sri Lanka and Pakistan only that we've beaten them so ofcourse logically Pakistan would be the better subcontinent team...
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 14th March 2011, 18:30
SameerP SameerP is offline
Local Club Star
 
Debut: Mar 2011
Runs: 1,302
Whoever voted for India is flat out lying or is delusional, We couldn't win the match against England after scoring almost 350 and lost against South africa and our batsmen gave 9 wickets for 29 runs. Pakistan's performance has been good other than the New zealand match
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 14th March 2011, 18:30
cricketindiafan's Avatar
cricketindiafan cricketindiafan is offline
First Class Star
 
Debut: Feb 2010
Runs: 4,091
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Khan
What happened to the Spin factory in India. How come we don't see any quality spinners from them?? May be Indian PPers can elaborate.

Also I think IPL has done harm to India cricket, as we can witness. All they are producing are T20 style batsmen, with no quality fast bowler or spinner.
BCCI doesn't care about developing the game. Their entire focus is on IPL and CL these days. There were plans to start a pacers cacademy at Mohali and a spinners academy at Chennai , but those remain on paper.

IPL too has played its part. Someone like Amit Mishra or even Pragyan Ojha, both good talents, haven't moved to the next level despite playing international cricket for 2-3 years. During the off season, they obviously have no motivation to work hard with easy money from IPL guarateeing a safe future.

Having said that, Ashwin looks to be a genuine talent and needs to be nurtured properly. Looks to be a lambi race ka ghoda
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 14th March 2011, 18:41
Sitges Sitges is offline
Junior Player
 
Debut: Dec 2009
Venue: Barcelona, Spain
Runs: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by cricketindiafan

Having said that, Ashwin looks to be a genuine talent and needs to be nurtured properly. Looks to be a lambi race ka ghoda
I hope you meant Ghora and not Ghada.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 14th March 2011, 18:43
ZenBowman's Avatar
ZenBowman ZenBowman is offline
Local Club Captain
 
Debut: Feb 2011
Runs: 2,229
Quote:
Originally Posted by SameerP
Whoever voted for India is flat out lying or is delusional, We couldn't win the match against England after scoring almost 350 and lost against South africa and our batsmen gave 9 wickets for 29 runs. Pakistan's performance has been good other than the New zealand match
Agreed, I voted for Pakistan. Despite the BCCI sponsored hype we are the underdogs here, Pak, SL, SA and Aus are the hot favorites.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 14th March 2011, 18:55
sohailmm's Avatar
sohailmm sohailmm is offline
Local Club Regular
 
Debut: Nov 2005
Venue: Turku , Finland
Runs: 713
We can see it in an other way also :which asian team other teams would like to avoid in QF ?
The answer for me is pretty straight forward : India .
I say this coz of the massive fear their batting order cast on the opposition .
__________________
My bowling video in nets
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUfpP_ve-Yk

Last edited by sohailmm; 14th March 2011 at 19:01.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 14th March 2011, 18:58
Bullet Drive's Avatar
Bullet Drive Bullet Drive is offline
Test Match Star
 
Debut: Oct 2010
Venue: UK
Runs: 26,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZenBowman
Agreed, I voted for Pakistan. Despite the BCCI sponsored hype we are the underdogs here, Pak, SL, SA and Aus are the hot favorites.
I really like your posts are you are probably the most unbiased Indian.

I still think that Aus, SA, Ind & SL are favorites with Pakistan being the dark horses.
__________________
Jamshed, U.Akmal, Shehzad, Haris, Hammad, Raza, Ehsan & Junaid - future of PAK
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 14th March 2011, 19:01
waqar_ahmad waqar_ahmad is offline
Test Match Debutant
 
Debut: Dec 2005
Runs: 16,986
Quote:
Originally Posted by Afridi_Fan
I think SL has been the best so far, even in that defeat to Pakistan they came close to us. Where as we are thrashed by NZL.

There is no need to discuss India in this thread.
SL came close coz of kami.

We were thrashed by the kiwis coz of kami.

Rest of the team played well
__________________
Ghareeb saray mar gaye
Kiun kai, zinda hai bhutto zinda hai
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 14th March 2011, 19:02
Rizie's Avatar
Rizie Rizie is offline
First Class Star
 
Debut: Jun 2009
Runs: 3,510
SL has played well both with the bat and bowl

we only won the first 3 games because of afridi
__________________
Misbah's favorite shot? anywhere for a dot
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 14th March 2011, 19:05
pak4life's Avatar
pak4life pak4life is offline
First Class Captain
 
Debut: Sep 2005
Venue: Birmingham
Runs: 5,369
pak India and ban have all taken hammerings SL on the other have been consistently decent without being spectacular.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 14th March 2011, 19:06
ddss's Avatar
ddss ddss is offline
First Class Player
 
Debut: May 2010
Runs: 2,772
Sri Lanka, simply because they haven't been thrashed so far.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 14th March 2011, 19:08
WithLoveFromCanada's Avatar
WithLoveFromCanada WithLoveFromCanada is offline
ODI Debutant
 
Debut: Jun 2009
Venue: Your home
Runs: 11,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddss
Sri Lanka, simply because they haven't been thrashed so far.
same reason..sri lanka.
__________________
Rana the flying doormat!!! - Shane Warne
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 14th March 2011, 20:52
gsivak's Avatar
gsivak gsivak is offline
Local Club Regular
 
Debut: Mar 2010
Runs: 877
I think other than the game against NZ, Pak has been exceeding expectations, SL has been meeting expectation and India has definitely been under performing. I think Bangladesh has been doing well too but I don't expect them to go beyond QFs.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 14th March 2011, 21:00
md_tariq md_tariq is offline
Local Club Regular
 
Debut: Jan 2011
Venue: Gilbert
Runs: 711
wrong thread

Last edited by md_tariq; 14th March 2011 at 21:02.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 14th March 2011, 21:03
Khan6575 Khan6575 is offline
Tape Ball Star
 
Debut: Mar 2011
Runs: 1,239
Quote:
Originally Posted by md_tariq
I dont understand why these polls are created. I dont think any Pakistani fan would say that Indian stadiums are better, no matter how many millions they invest in those stadiums. Eden Gargen is one of the best grounds in the world. But if I conduct the poll here between Eden Garden and the new stadium where Pakistan played NZ, I would say all Pakistan fans here would choose that Kandy stadium. Best thing is just avoid creating these kind of polls.
Your eyes or reading skills have deceived you. The poll is not about stadiums, it is about subcontinent teams performance so far in this world cup.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 14th March 2011, 21:08
md_tariq md_tariq is offline
Local Club Regular
 
Debut: Jan 2011
Venue: Gilbert
Runs: 711
Quote:
Originally Posted by Khan6575
Your eyes or reading skills have deceived you. The poll is not about stadiums, it is about subcontinent teams performance so far in this world cup.
dude I mistakenly wrote it in this thread. I apologize. why dont you talk about main things that mentioned in the post.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 14th March 2011, 21:09
freelance_cricketer's Avatar
freelance_cricketer freelance_cricketer is offline
Senior Test Match Player
 
Debut: Jan 2011
Venue: Aliens
Runs: 39,197
So far-

Pakistan=Sri Lanka> Bangladesh > India

Honest opinion, India is the only one from this group not to have defeated a decent team. We haven't peaked yet, saving the best for the knock outs
__________________
Mr.PakPassion

Last edited by freelance_cricketer; 14th March 2011 at 21:12.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 14th March 2011, 21:13
Gollum's Avatar
Gollum Gollum is online now
T20I Debutant
 
Debut: Jan 2009
Runs: 8,250
For now SL by a slight margin.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 14th March 2011, 21:14
Khan6575 Khan6575 is offline
Tape Ball Star
 
Debut: Mar 2011
Runs: 1,239
Quote:
Originally Posted by md_tariq
dude I mistakenly wrote it in this thread. I apologize. why dont you talk about main things that mentioned in the post.
Why don't you follow your own advise and not post on wrong threads.

As far as the OPs question goes WHO CARES the real tournament will begin on March 23, what happened in the past few games will be thrown out the window. That is what I am looking forward to, the future....... not the past.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 14th March 2011, 21:15
The Yorker The Yorker is offline
Junior Player
 
Debut: Jan 2011
Runs: 185
All of the south asian teams could do better. If they don 't improve in certains aspect of their game then most of them may well be put out in the QF unless they play each other.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 14th March 2011, 21:20
ZenBowman's Avatar
ZenBowman ZenBowman is offline
Local Club Captain
 
Debut: Feb 2011
Runs: 2,229
Quote:
Originally Posted by haroon_ahmed103
I really like your posts are you are probably the most unbiased Indian.

I still think that Aus, SA, Ind & SL are favorites with Pakistan being the dark horses.
I don't think india belongs in that group - certainly they are very dangerous because they may bat you out of the game (almost did that vs RSA), but to be favourites you need to have a good bowling attack and good batting. In that sense I guess Pakistan is also not a favourite due to shaky batting.

Favourites: Aus, SA, SL
Dangerous: Pak, Ind
Dark horses: Nz, WI
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 14th March 2011, 21:20
Abidi110 Abidi110 is offline
Local Club Regular
 
Debut: Apr 2010
Runs: 711
Must be India, closely followed by SL.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 14th March 2011, 21:25
The Yorker The Yorker is offline
Junior Player
 
Debut: Jan 2011
Runs: 185
India need to secure their bowling to leak less runs, Pak need to drop shezad for shafiq and umar akmal coming back in unless he feels really moody then he can be sent home. stick with riaz instead of akhtar who has run out of steam the rawalpindi express needs to be scrapped.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 15th March 2011, 00:10
Minku Minku is offline
Tape Ball Regular
 
Debut: Sep 2010
Runs: 303
All 4 teams have massive holes to fill in their lineups..

India has a huge problem with bowling ..although I must say Zaheer Khan looks awesome..

Srilanka has a problem with their middle and lower order batting and I think that will cost them in the end...

Pakistan has a problem with Keeping, and top order and to an extent Razzaq

Bangladesh is very inconsistent ....


I think they all havent done as well as they should have.. considering they are playing in home conditions...
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 15th March 2011, 01:20
Inswinging Yorker's Avatar
Inswinging Yorker Inswinging Yorker is offline
T20I Debutant
 
Debut: Oct 2006
Runs: 8,356
srilanka and India
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 15th March 2011, 01:23
hasanmehmoodkhan's Avatar
hasanmehmoodkhan hasanmehmoodkhan is offline
First Class Captain
 
Debut: Apr 2007
Venue: Canada
Runs: 5,785
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZenBowman
What is really surprising to me is that the spinners from subcontinent teams have not made a mark (apart from Afridi), while spinners from other teams are doing quite well...
ya agree this is very wierd as sl have some very good spinners. i guess if you count imran tahir then he he and afridi are doing good
__________________
number 1 fan of Hammad Azam the Attock Assassin
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 15th March 2011, 01:39
Ashraful_Rox's Avatar
Ashraful_Rox Ashraful_Rox is offline
T20I Debutant
 
Debut: Feb 2010
Venue: New York
Runs: 7,130
Voted for India, honest opinion.
__________________
2022 Change will come to Bangladesh, Vote for me ;)
YOLO
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 15th March 2011, 02:00
riasat riasat is offline
Tape Ball Regular
 
Debut: Mar 2009
Runs: 449
Team wise

India>SL>Pakistan>Bangladesh

Now based on performance shown compared to expected...

India did not do too much justice, should have won all their matches...

Pakistan did not do too well either, Altho it managed to defeat SL but Lanka did not field a full strength side. And loss against NZ in subcontinent conditions is just bad

SL is doing the best, they played well in almost all the matches, lost to Pak but then again did not field their best 11

Bangladesh bowling has been outstanding but batting has been below par... they won 3 matches which i guess was what most people in bangladesh hoped for. Hoping they reach the QF but cannot go further for sure...

SL>IN>PAK>BD
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 15th March 2011, 02:05
freelance_cricketer's Avatar
freelance_cricketer freelance_cricketer is offline
Senior Test Match Player
 
Debut: Jan 2011
Venue: Aliens
Runs: 39,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashraful_Rox
Voted for India, honest opinion.
You must be kidding, we haven't defeated a decent side yet
__________________
Mr.PakPassion
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 15th March 2011, 02:12
Dr Khan Dr Khan is offline
First Class Player
 
Debut: Jan 2010
Venue: Connecticut USA
Runs: 3,123
Lets cut Pakistan some slack. They are the only SC team which is not playing on home grounds, under home conditions and crowd.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 15th March 2011, 02:23
ads101's Avatar
ads101 ads101 is offline
ODI Debutant
 
Debut: Dec 2009
Runs: 9,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by freelance_cricketer
You must be kidding, we haven't defeated a decent side yet
Same as Sri Lanka. Yet people are still rating them.

In this tournament, it's not so much of a worry with your obvious flaw. It's when your strength starts failing. India's batting has looked rock solid in this world cup so far. As long as they keep putting 300+ scores, they've got a very good chance of winning really.

Pakistan the problem is they're bowling hasn't been up to scratch in places. Conceded too many against New Zealand. Our extra spinner,ajmal/Rehman hasn't looked effective. Akhtar has been on and off. Razzaq's been on and off too. I'm still not sure on these pitches, a strong bowling attack can cover over the cracks of a batting attack. But if our bowling attack isn't looking perfect, there's serious doubts we can win this.

India's batting hasn't really put a foot wrong. Their bowling has let them down.

Sri Lanka have looked ordinary in my opinion. We will see how they perform against New Zealand. Against Pakistan, their bowling was decent. But Pakistan outbowled and outbatted them that game. If it were not for our fielding, we may have won by a considerable margin.

The best batting I've seen has been by India. Best bowling I've seen has been by South Africa (who have limited teams to low scores, even their spinners seem to be performing).

Last edited by ads101; 15th March 2011 at 02:25.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 15th March 2011, 02:24
Ashraful_Rox's Avatar
Ashraful_Rox Ashraful_Rox is offline
T20I Debutant
 
Debut: Feb 2010
Venue: New York
Runs: 7,130
Quote:
Originally Posted by freelance_cricketer
You must be kidding, we haven't defeated a decent side yet
You guys are at the top of the table. I am sure you guys will beat West Indies. Take it easy buddy, don't feel bad, maybe you guys will win it in the knockout stage if not WI, which is more sweeter.
__________________
2022 Change will come to Bangladesh, Vote for me ;)
YOLO
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 15th March 2011, 17:01
Inswinging Yorker's Avatar
Inswinging Yorker Inswinging Yorker is offline
T20I Debutant
 
Debut: Oct 2006
Runs: 8,356
well pak did defeat a major test side, but they also too good ass whipping from a major test team, then their batting failed miserably against a minnow side,If it was not for afridi and luck from the umpire.

Srilanka did lode to pak ,but it was not a heavy defeat, Malinga could have made a difference.

So i would still say Srilanka is tops followed by India.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 15th March 2011, 19:41
Looney's Avatar
Looney Looney is offline
T20I Star
 
Debut: Jun 2009
Venue: London
Runs: 20,535
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZenBowman
What is really surprising to me is that the spinners from subcontinent teams have not made a mark (apart from Afridi), while spinners from other teams are doing quite well...
i think you must have really high standards because Zaheer Khan is the third highest wicket taker
__________________
Bhai tou bhai ‚ bhai ka Karachi bhi bhai - Bhai from London :altaf
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 15th March 2011, 20:12
cornered-tigers cornered-tigers is offline
Local Club Regular
 
Debut: Feb 2011
Runs: 992
I think no one has impressed if you talk about overall game.
If INdian openers have flourished, Pak's openers have been abysmal, Sri Lanka has done goo din opening. Bowling wise, India has lacked wicket-taking ability, whereas Pak and Sri Lanka has looked stronger in glimpses. Bangladesh has at least shown a lot of grit and character to hang in there. Fileding wise Sri Lankans have been much better than others, so I am kind of really confused whether these teams have really done well, I think jury is still out on this!
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 15th March 2011, 20:15
cornered-tigers cornered-tigers is offline
Local Club Regular
 
Debut: Feb 2011
Runs: 992
India is a hype due to its batting, but, is it a world class team like the Aussies and Windies of the past, they are not a shoadow of those teams, let alone a strong team. For a team to be strong, it has to be rock solid in all departments of the game to roll over any side any day of the year, most times than not.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:43.



Powered by: vBulletin and VBAdvanced CMPS
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PakPassion™ © copyright 2013 All Rights Reserved. Content on PakPassion™ requires permission for reprint.
One of the largest message boards on the web !