User Name Password
Go Back   PakPassion - Pakistan Cricket Forum > Sport > Cricket


Share This Forum!  
 
 
     
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 27th July 2006, 14:39
Farhad Farhad is offline
Test Match Debutant
 
Debut: Jan 2003
Runs: 14,284
Can Sami do it?

Well, not expecting any fifers here, but whether he can become the first specialist bowler ever in entire Test history to average 50? He's on 48.5 coming into this Test.

Way to go, Karachi Express!!

Don't want to entertain talk of him being unlucky or whatever.....you get on with the game and to take the former recourse is not convincing at all. His average is not even mediocre - it is DIABOLICAL, shambolic, abysmal...... and that can mean just one thing - he is USELESS, a tried and tested failure.

We had Shahid Nazir drafted in for this tour...wonder how much more dross does Sami need to deliver before Karachi Express can be shown the door?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27th July 2006, 14:45
Daoud's Avatar
Daoud Daoud is offline
Test Match Debutant
 
Debut: Sep 2003
Venue: Sydney
Runs: 16,626
Well it is an achievement and fans of every team apart from NZL will really thank us for what we've done
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27th July 2006, 14:53
Farhad Farhad is offline
Test Match Debutant
 
Debut: Jan 2003
Runs: 14,284
The term "Karachi Express" I heard on Geo, and could not help laughing at the pathetic analogy. Akhtar, officially 31 is a prince amongst world pacers and this dross-serving sifaarshee Sami is not even fit to tie Shoaib's boot-laces.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27th July 2006, 15:02
ammarz's Avatar
ammarz ammarz is offline
Local Club Star
 
Debut: Nov 2005
Venue: Princeton, NJ USA
Runs: 1,577
50 average our opening batsmen would dream off. oh i forgot its bowling average never mind
Go SAMI GO!!!you can do it
__________________
"I am the patron saint of mediocrity.."--Salieri
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27th July 2006, 15:15
Nauman Nauman is offline
ODI Debutant
 
Debut: Feb 2005
Venue: Lahore, Pakistan
Runs: 9,736
Come on Sami we know you have it in you to achieve this, this will be a record which shall never be broken.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27th July 2006, 15:21
Waqar's inswinging yorker Waqar's inswinging yorker is offline
Test Match Debutant
 
Debut: Jan 2005
Runs: 15,333
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nauman
Come on Sami we know you have it in you to achieve this, this will be a record which shall never be broken.
getting more than ridiculous now, he is opening the bowling for pakistan, why cant we just cheer him on during the match, leave selectorial issues for after the match. We are in a large hole right now, we need something from sami to help us here
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27th July 2006, 15:33
shikari shikari is offline
Local Club Regular
 
Debut: Jan 2005
Runs: 813
No Sami cannot do it

neither can GUl, Razzaq, Afridi and Kaneri

our bowling attacks lacks some firepower


we dont have wicket taking bowler in our lineup

Granted Kaneria takes more wickets but he has to bowl 50 + overs to do that
This will be a tough match to survive....with pathetic batting display



Drop Sami please
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 27th July 2006, 17:28
cricket_crazy cricket_crazy is offline
Local Club Regular
 
Debut: Jan 2005
Runs: 749
Sami has always disappointed us and will disappoint this time as well...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 27th July 2006, 17:31
iZeeshan's Avatar
iZeeshan iZeeshan is online now
Senior T20I Player
 
Debut: Aug 2005
Venue: Princeton, Atlanta, Bawarchi Palace
Runs: 30,887
He picked up a wicekt for 38 runs, thus, its not possible.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 27th July 2006, 17:33
Abdul Qadir 236 Abdul Qadir 236 is offline
ODI Debutant
 
Debut: Aug 2004
Venue: Louvain-la-Neuve
Runs: 10,999
must be deja vu for shahid nazir after he was so laughably omitted in australia.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 27th July 2006, 17:39
infamous9383's Avatar
infamous9383 infamous9383 is offline
ODI Debutant
 
Debut: Dec 2005
Venue: new jersey
Runs: 12,969
hey guys stop bashing sami so much after all he has the longest over in odis against the aussie feared bangladesh
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 27th July 2006, 17:50
Amoeba's Avatar
Amoeba Amoeba is offline
ODI Debutant
 
Debut: Jan 2005
Venue: A Hong Kong Pond
Runs: 9,068
Bowled well today - so maybe the bashers will have their day in the sun tomorrow.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 27th July 2006, 17:55
Abdul Qadir 236 Abdul Qadir 236 is offline
ODI Debutant
 
Debut: Aug 2004
Venue: Louvain-la-Neuve
Runs: 10,999
he hardly bowled well yaar
he was well down on pace and lacked the cutting edge one expects from the spearhead of a Pakistani attack.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 27th July 2006, 18:00
Amoeba's Avatar
Amoeba Amoeba is offline
ODI Debutant
 
Debut: Jan 2005
Venue: A Hong Kong Pond
Runs: 9,068
He bowled tidily, not much loose stuff, got a wicket and had a difficult chance dropped by Beavis the Teflon man. Given how much practice he gives to the slips when he bats you'd imgaine he might be able to see the odd one now and again. Anyway that is probably a different thread.

Back to Sami - he lacked the cutting edge of a spearhead but he still bowled well. This wasn't a mindless display that annoys so many here.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 27th July 2006, 18:06
Abdul Qadir 236 Abdul Qadir 236 is offline
ODI Debutant
 
Debut: Aug 2004
Venue: Louvain-la-Neuve
Runs: 10,999
i see what ur saying but the only reason he is picked is because he is meant to be fast!!!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 27th July 2006, 18:14
Kamranz's Avatar
Kamranz Kamranz is offline
Tape Ball Captain
 
Debut: Apr 2005
Runs: 1,996
Can sami do it?

Answer: No! He's lost the peace and no point including him.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 27th July 2006, 18:14
Abdul Qadir 236 Abdul Qadir 236 is offline
ODI Debutant
 
Debut: Aug 2004
Venue: Louvain-la-Neuve
Runs: 10,999
then he can break the 50 barrier!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 27th July 2006, 18:15
Amoeba's Avatar
Amoeba Amoeba is offline
ODI Debutant
 
Debut: Jan 2005
Venue: A Hong Kong Pond
Runs: 9,068
Yes but with only 119 runs on the board I don't think he really was given licence to go all out and merely bowl as fast as he could. In a way it helped as he was much more accurate. He is a fast bowler and in the long term he needs to work on this. However given today's situation it was more a case of not giving any easy runs away.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 27th July 2006, 18:16
Abdul Qadir 236 Abdul Qadir 236 is offline
ODI Debutant
 
Debut: Aug 2004
Venue: Louvain-la-Neuve
Runs: 10,999
well i think the less runs u have the more attacking you should be because u cant afford to scratch around - u need to go for it!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 27th July 2006, 18:31
Amoeba's Avatar
Amoeba Amoeba is offline
ODI Debutant
 
Debut: Jan 2005
Venue: A Hong Kong Pond
Runs: 9,068
Yes - but only if you have the armoury! Sami is our 4 / 5 choice seamer. The equivalent of Plunklett or Mahmood. If he gone out to bowl fast he would have probably, as usual, sprayed it around going at 5rpo. England would have got away and we would have really been in the brown stuff. As it was Gul was costly and Kaneria / Afridi ineffectual and weren't able to chip away once Abdul Razzaq and Sami came off.

Unfortunate as it may be for his detractors here and supporters / Neutrals (of which I'm one) Sami was definately our best bowler.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 27th July 2006, 18:32
Abdul Qadir 236 Abdul Qadir 236 is offline
ODI Debutant
 
Debut: Aug 2004
Venue: Louvain-la-Neuve
Runs: 10,999
i actually thought kaneria was the best bowler.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 27th July 2006, 18:35
Amoeba's Avatar
Amoeba Amoeba is offline
ODI Debutant
 
Debut: Jan 2005
Venue: A Hong Kong Pond
Runs: 9,068
Much more is expected of Kaneria - especially on a wicket where Monty just took three wickets. He bowled well but from what I saw (missed about 30 mins after tea) he didn't really pose too great a threat to the batsman - more to Faisal!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 27th July 2006, 18:39
Abdul Qadir 236 Abdul Qadir 236 is offline
ODI Debutant
 
Debut: Aug 2004
Venue: Louvain-la-Neuve
Runs: 10,999
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 27th July 2006, 18:43
Easa Easa is offline
Test Match Star
 
Debut: Aug 2005
Venue: My Room
Runs: 27,735
Sami has turned into a medium pacer.

He struggles to reach 90 MPH these days.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 27th July 2006, 18:45
cinderella cinderella is offline
First Class Star
 
Debut: Nov 2005
Runs: 3,237
From the performance today: no
He was bowling all in 80 mph range.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 27th July 2006, 18:52
Abdul Qadir 236 Abdul Qadir 236 is offline
ODI Debutant
 
Debut: Aug 2004
Venue: Louvain-la-Neuve
Runs: 10,999
well they have even more faith in him than fletcher does in gojo so i can see 50 being broken!
sami fans are clutching at straws to justify his place.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 27th July 2006, 19:39
asifp's Avatar
asifp asifp is offline
T20I Debutant
 
Debut: Nov 2005
Runs: 8,418
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmitMishra bowls wrongun
must be deja vu for shahid nazir after he was so laughably omitted in australia.
I thought he had done enough by performing well in the side games and taking wickets, Bob and Inzi just refuse to replace Sami when on tour. Even is Nazir took a 10wkt hall in the side match he would still be carrying water.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 27th July 2006, 20:00
Amjid Javed's Avatar
Amjid Javed Amjid Javed is offline
PakPassion Living Legend Poster
 
Debut: Mar 2004
Venue: Manchester, UK
Runs: 92,041
This is sumat il back sami to do and sucseed in!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 27th July 2006, 20:56
tradecars's Avatar
tradecars tradecars is offline
Tape Ball Star
 
Debut: Jan 2006
Venue: BIRMINGHAM
Runs: 1,170
this must be the weakest pak bowling attack for a very long time shame on the selectors for having faith in sami and gul.
razaq is an allrounder so he is only really expected to take a wicket or two.
afridi another so called allrounder dont make me laugh
danish will get wickets if we get a chance to bowl england in the second innings

its about time we changed the selectors
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 27th July 2006, 20:59
Amoeba's Avatar
Amoeba Amoeba is offline
ODI Debutant
 
Debut: Jan 2005
Venue: A Hong Kong Pond
Runs: 9,068
Faisal did ok in the last test and the previous one which was more than can be said for Beavis & Butt 0 (sorry Butthead). The managment liked his fighting qualities. Kamran shouldn't have opened but maybe that's the result of Afridi throwing a strop again!

Sami should have been rested after the Lords display but in the end he was our best seamer if not bowler overall today.

Last edited by Saj; 27th July 2006 at 21:14.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 27th July 2006, 21:15
Saj Saj is offline
PP Exclusives and Interviews Team
 
Debut: Jun 2001
Venue: UK
Runs: 55,261
Stick to cricket folks. Leave out the disgraceful comments about family connections.
__________________
Click here to access........The PakPassion Gallery | PakPassion Articles | The Exclusive Interviews Section | PakPassion In the Media | History of PakPassion |The Talent Spotter Section

To Follow Me on Twitter : @Saj_PakPassion
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 28th July 2006, 07:21
MIG's Avatar
MIG MIG is offline
PakPassion Administrator
 
Debut: Oct 2004
Venue: Apnay ghar mai - aur kahan ?
Runs: 45,880
Quote:
Originally Posted by shikari
No Sami cannot do it

neither can GUl, Razzaq, Afridi and Kaneri

our bowling attacks lacks some firepower


we dont have wicket taking bowler in our lineup

Granted Kaneria takes more wickets but he has to bowl 50 + overs to do thatThis will be a tough match to survive....with pathetic batting display



Drop Sami please

Extremely odd conclusion to your argument !!
__________________
For answers to the Universe, Life and everything : TheSourceNews(TSN)
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 28th July 2006, 08:09
ShowStopper's Avatar
ShowStopper ShowStopper is offline
Local Club Captain
 
Debut: May 2006
Venue: Human Jungle
Runs: 2,406
Please drop him now

They say enough is enough...................

http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/colu...ry/254771.html

After going through above I say Sami is more than enough. Send him to Exil Islands.
__________________
"George W. Bush and Osama bin Laden — be truthful — who would win a popular vote in Pakistan?" asked Stewart.

"I think they'll both lose miserably," replied Musharraf, an answer met with raucous laughter by the "Daily Show" audience.


Now Thats Fresh
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 28th July 2006, 08:28
ex-opener ex-opener is offline
Tape Ball Regular
 
Debut: Jul 2006
Runs: 329
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShowStopper
They say enough is enough...................

http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/colu...ry/254771.html

After going through above I say Sami is more than enough. Send him to Exil Islands.
He is in this test match so please give him a chance to his credit he has bowled a little bit better (13 overs got 1 - 36). to his credit he did entice an edge from strauss in the very first over but as per usual slips put it down
all day yesterday my guts were tearing me apart from watching a dismal performance from my beloved countrymen. today inshallah things can only get better PAKISTAN ZINDABAD

Last edited by ex-opener; 28th July 2006 at 08:31.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 28th July 2006, 09:50
Hashim Hashim is offline
Local Club Star
 
Debut: Mar 2005
Runs: 1,415
You guyz are pathetic and I don't know how some of you claim you are Pakistani fans! Why you giving Sami so much grief and cracking jokes, he was the best bowler yeserday and he picked up the wicket of Trescothick we know if he would have stayed kin that Rami would have scored big-time, and Sami could have got Stauss out first over but drop catch! I am not saying that he was bowling world-class excellent standard, but he bowled well and tdy. He tried hard and he done something, i just REALLY hope he ignores Woolmer or who ever is teling him to cut down his pace, takes a long run-up and bowls 90mph plus like he normally does and really attacks England, we have Gul and Razzaq to bowl Medium so why Sami as well. he should be the strike bowler and do what he does best, bowl fast!
__________________
Student of islam
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 28th July 2006, 09:52
ammir ammir is offline
Junior Player
 
Debut: Jan 2006
Runs: 74
Sami was the best bowler yesterday. It is the best I have seen him bowl for a long time. He should take that attitude into today hopefully.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 28th July 2006, 09:52
Has's Avatar
Has Has is offline
Tape Ball Captain
 
Debut: Jun 2005
Venue: London
Runs: 1,775
Cut the guy some slack, I dont think the guy is good enough, but I wouldent celebrate his faliure, and he did bowl well yesterday so back off.
__________________
i don't have an amusing signature
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 28th July 2006, 10:10
MIG's Avatar
MIG MIG is offline
PakPassion Administrator
 
Debut: Oct 2004
Venue: Apnay ghar mai - aur kahan ?
Runs: 45,880
Thats right - I am just listening to the comms and looking at his figures - well done to Sami - not bad!
__________________
For answers to the Universe, Life and everything : TheSourceNews(TSN)
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 28th July 2006, 10:11
Oxy's Avatar
Oxy Oxy is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Debut: Jun 2003
Venue: Land of the Obese
Runs: 70,771
Its about agenda's - you dont like a player, you want him to fail...simple.

I'm no Sami fan - but when he steps on to thepitch - I'm behind him 100%.

And by all accounts - he had a good bowl yesterday without much luck.
__________________
Saeed Ajmal & Younis Khan: The Pride of Pakistan
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 28th July 2006, 18:19
Farhad Farhad is offline
Test Match Debutant
 
Debut: Jan 2003
Runs: 14,284
I guess maybe he was the best bowler today as well then. Exactly how many times in the recent past have you seen him pick a couple of wickets in an innings? 2 for 80-odd? Amazing stuff - he is improving.

Quite a joke to be defending a so-called specialist bowler who is on the verge of averaging 50.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 28th July 2006, 18:23
asifp's Avatar
asifp asifp is offline
T20I Debutant
 
Debut: Nov 2005
Runs: 8,418
Article Proving Sami is the worst test bowler of all time

http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/colu...ry/254771.html

The Friday column
The travails of Mohammad Sami
S Rajesh
July 28, 2006

Five years ago he was touted as Pakistan's next big fast-bowling hope, but since then it's been one steady downward slide. At Lord's in the first Test against England last week, Mohammad Sami's stock went down even further, when he leaked 139 runs from 34 overs, and had only one wicket to show for his efforts. It was the seventh time in his fledging 26-Test career that Sami had gone past the century mark at the bowling crease with a wicket or less as his reward. Contrast that with his match haul of 8 for 106 in his debut Test - a performance which won him the Man-of-the-Match award - and it gives you an idea of just how far he has slipped.

Sami's latest debacle at Lord's means that he is fast hurtling towards a landmark which cherished by a batsman, but isn't such an encouraging sign for a bowler - an average of 50. If Sami gives away 96 more runs without taking a wicket in the Old Trafford Test - or gives away an additional 50 runs for every wicket he takes - he will break the 50 barrier. That he continues to be part of Pakistan's Test match set-up is an indication of just how highly he is still rated, or just how threadbare Pakistan's bowling cupboard is after injuries to many of their frontline bowlers.

Over the years, Sami's career has progressed along very similar lines to another wiry fast-bowling talent from whom much was expected. Ajit Agarkar has played in exactly as many Tests as Sami, taken eight fewer wickets, and averages only marginally lower. There are more similarities too - both have a strike rate of exactly 83.7 deliveries per wicket, and while Sami's best Test figures read 8 for 106 (against New Zealand on his debut), Agarkar's is 8 for 160, against Australia at Adelaide in 2003-04.

The table below lists the fast bowlers who have the worst averages after playing at least 25 Tests and taking at least 50 wickets. The two names mentioned above figure on top of the list, and by quite some distance too - the next in the list, Pramodya Wickramasinghe, averages less than 42 per wicket. The table also excludes those who are primarily batsmen - Nathan Astle, Guy Whittall, Mudassar Nazar and Wally Hammond all make the cut according to the criteria, but none of them were in the team primarily for their bowling ability.


Worst averages for fast bowlers (at least 25 Tests, 50 wickets)
Bowler Tests Wickets Average Strike rate
Mohammad Sami 26 66 48.54 83.7
Ajit Agarkar 26 58 47.32 83.7
Pramodya Wickramasinghe 40 85 41.87 85.4
Madan Lal 39 71 40.08 84.4
Bryan Strang 26 56 39.33 97.0
Mahmood Hussain 27 68 38.64 86.9
Henry Olonga 30 6 8 38.52 66.2
Martin Snedden 25 58 37.91 86.0
Lance Klusener 49 80 37.91 86.0
Chris Lewis 32 93 37.52 73.6

The problem for Pakistan and for Sami has been that Sami has shown little signs of improving - in fact, as the table below shows, his average has progressively worsened over each five-Test period. In his last six Tests, for example, Sami has managed 16 wickets at an exorbitant 51.63. Both of Sami's five-wicket hauls have come in New Zealand, against whom he averages 35; against the other teams the figure balloons up to 52.17. According to the ICC's Future Tours Program, Pakistan aren't supposed to go to New Zealand again till December 2010. If Sami doesn't deliver against some of the other teams in the interim, it's highly unlikely he will be on the plane to New Zealand in four years' time.

Sami - from bad to worse
After Test no. Wickets Average 5WI/ 10WM
5 14 40.50 1/ 0
10 26 44.23 1/ 0
15 39 46.94 2/ 0
20 53 47.84 2/ 0
26 66 48.54 2/ 0
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 28th July 2006, 18:26
iZeeshan's Avatar
iZeeshan iZeeshan is online now
Senior T20I Player
 
Debut: Aug 2005
Venue: Princeton, Atlanta, Bawarchi Palace
Runs: 30,887
I read this article too on Crapinfo. He's really bad. But I've seen worse (i.e Micheal Lewis).
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 28th July 2006, 18:28
Farhad Farhad is offline
Test Match Debutant
 
Debut: Jan 2003
Runs: 14,284
Quite an achievement to return the worst bowling returns of all time.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 28th July 2006, 18:29
infamous9383's Avatar
infamous9383 infamous9383 is offline
ODI Debutant
 
Debut: Dec 2005
Venue: new jersey
Runs: 12,969
lay off sami he has been bowling okay
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 28th July 2006, 18:29
KB KB is offline
PakPassion Writer
 
Debut: Jan 2001
Runs: 7,962
When he appeared on the scene he was being compared to Marshall, in style. Now he is being compared to Agarkar.

Sad to see unfulfilled potential.

Last edited by ggm; 28th July 2006 at 18:31.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 28th July 2006, 18:30
qasim722's Avatar
qasim722 qasim722 is offline
First Class Player
 
Debut: Jun 2006
Venue: Lahore
Runs: 2,725
Micheal Lewis.........................The Scapegoat!
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 28th July 2006, 18:32
asifp's Avatar
asifp asifp is offline
T20I Debutant
 
Debut: Nov 2005
Runs: 8,418
Well atleast he consistenly picks up like 12-13 wickets every 5 games.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 28th July 2006, 19:03
ammarz's Avatar
ammarz ammarz is offline
Local Club Star
 
Debut: Nov 2005
Venue: Princeton, NJ USA
Runs: 1,577
i was rooting for SAMI to break the 50 average barrier. Damn. i guess my prayers never get answered
__________________
"I am the patron saint of mediocrity.."--Salieri
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 28th July 2006, 19:36
asifp's Avatar
asifp asifp is offline
T20I Debutant
 
Debut: Nov 2005
Runs: 8,418
Quote:
Originally Posted by ammarz
i was rooting for SAMI to break the 50 average barrier. Damn. i guess my prayers never get answered
Damn G Jones I guess
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 28th July 2006, 19:37
Oxy's Avatar
Oxy Oxy is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Debut: Jun 2003
Venue: Land of the Obese
Runs: 70,771
Quote:
Originally Posted by ammarz
i was rooting for SAMI to break the 50 average barrier. Damn. i guess my prayers never get answered
I can never understand why Pak 'fans' want players to fail!
__________________
Saeed Ajmal & Younis Khan: The Pride of Pakistan
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 28th July 2006, 19:39
Awesome Anjum's Avatar
Awesome Anjum Awesome Anjum is offline
T20I Debutant
 
Debut: Feb 2002
Runs: 7,574
Quote:
Originally Posted by ammarz
i was rooting for SAMI to break the 50 average barrier. Damn. i guess my prayers never get answered
I can understand if you don't want a player in the side, but to want them to fail...
__________________
Majid Jehangir Khan - classiest Pakistani cricketer both on and off the field.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 5th August 2006, 02:38
jackal786 jackal786 is offline
First Class Captain
 
Debut: Feb 2006
Runs: 5,301
I am rooting for Sami

to reach his 50!! He started this series with 48 plus i believe. Now he is into his 49!!
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 5th August 2006, 02:39
Pathan007's Avatar
Pathan007 Pathan007 is offline
First Class Captain
 
Debut: Jan 2005
Venue: New York
Runs: 5,620
i'm rooting for him that he'll get a 10for 2nd inning. btw if he gets it, he'll stay 10yrs wid Pakistan team. so he better pick up this bonus package.

Last edited by Pathan007; 5th August 2006 at 02:41.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 5th August 2006, 05:02
tanvy tanvy is offline
Junior Player
 
Debut: Jul 2006
Runs: 238
keep it up Jackal Bhai...the moment you find his roots, please destroy these as soon as possible. I will sponsor the pesticides.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 5th August 2006, 05:07
Lahoria Lahoria is offline
T20I Debutant
 
Debut: Jan 2000
Venue: Virginia, USA
Runs: 6,248
With Shoaib and Asif coming back Sami is a just waiting for his time to come, this should really be the end of his test career. Looking back I would have to say that he is more overrated than an underachiever.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 5th August 2006, 05:18
tanvy tanvy is offline
Junior Player
 
Debut: Jul 2006
Runs: 238
What a relief it would be! In fact, PCB should change his name in its record books to Ajit Agarkar, and the day should be celebrated by pak fans all over the world as "end-of-great-depression-day".
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 5th August 2006, 05:25
zMario zMario is offline
ODI Debutant
 
Debut: Feb 2002
Venue: Darrell Hair's house
Runs: 8,871
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lahoria
With Shoaib and Asif coming back Sami is a just waiting for his time to come, this should really be the end of his test career. Looking back I would have to say that he is more overrated than an underachiever.
True!
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 5th August 2006, 07:05
Asim2Good Asim2Good is offline
T20I Debutant
 
Debut: Jan 2005
Runs: 6,521
I m rooting for Sami to b up rooted from Pak team
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 5th August 2006, 07:24
Salman_S Salman_S is offline
Tape Ball Regular
 
Debut: Jul 2006
Venue: Sydney
Runs: 317
Unfortunately yes this will be the end of Sami's career. I'll remember him as the bowling who just couldn't live up to the pressure of what people expected of him. With wasim and waqar gone, Pakistan were too hasty of expecting the same results of him.

Lets hope we don't do the same to M Asif and Gul and let them develop.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 5th August 2006, 07:47
Amjid Javed's Avatar
Amjid Javed Amjid Javed is offline
PakPassion Living Legend Poster
 
Debut: Mar 2004
Venue: Manchester, UK
Runs: 92,041
sami is up to 49.24 now now far to go now.
Reply With Quote
  #61  
Old 5th August 2006, 11:22
jackal786 jackal786 is offline
First Class Captain
 
Debut: Feb 2006
Runs: 5,301
Sometime back i saw a picture of Imran standing next to Sami advising him "Use your brain"! He emphasizes that point more and more. He is the least intelligent fast bowler around in the world.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 7th August 2006, 14:41
Abdul Qadir 236 Abdul Qadir 236 is offline
ODI Debutant
 
Debut: Aug 2004
Venue: Louvain-la-Neuve
Runs: 10,999
had sami got to 69 runs without a wicket hed have reached 50!
too late now.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 7th August 2006, 14:42
Adeel786 Adeel786 is offline
Local Club Star
 
Debut: Jan 2005
Runs: 1,479
Honestly...sami has bowled beautifully today. He looks more relaxed and confident.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:52.



Powered by: vBulletin and VBAdvanced CMPS
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PakPassion™ © copyright 2013 All Rights Reserved. Content on PakPassion™ requires permission for reprint.
One of the largest message boards on the web !