User Name Password
Go Back   PakPassion - Pakistan Cricket Forum > Sport > Cricket


Share This Forum!  
 
 
     
 
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 9th April 2005, 21:20
OTW OTW is offline
Local Club Regular
 
Debut: Mar 2005
Venue: Where you live
Runs: 679
Erring on two different extremes of selection

From an article I wrote recently at overthewicket.com... just a point to ponder.

Quote:
What has stood out throughout this series is a difference in team selection methods with India and Pakistan banking on two different extremes. Pakistan have chopped and changed, trying the likes of Butt, Afridi, Malik, Akmal and Abdul Razzaq in the top three so far this series - India have shown a bloodyminded refusal to try and adapt. If the Pakistan team has been too intolerant of failure, the Indian team has erred on the other side of the fence - after all, how else can the performances of Yuvraj Singh, Mohammad Kaif, Sachin Tendulkar and Saurav Ganguly be explained? It would be a safe bet to say that for better or for worse, had they performed so miserably for Pakistan in a sequence of one-dayers, they would have been warming benches in the dressing rooms.
Moderation's needed in both cases... it doesn't help someone like Kamran Akmal to open one game, bat at 7 or 8 in another - while someone like Shahid Afridi could work well either in the middle order or the lower order, it's definitely not beneficial for the middle order to be moved around time after time, with all the chopping and changing going on. In the tests particularly, it was shocking to see the way Butt was axed after one bad performance (to follow his scores in Australia), and the way they keep literally using a revolving door selection policy in the Pakistan team.

Certainly could take a hint or two from the Indian side as far as perservering with certain players is concerned - but what about the Indians themselves? If Yuvraj was Pakistani, he wouldn't be playing right now where he is - either he'd have been shifted somewhere else in the batting, or would be axed. In the last 20 games, he's averaged around 23.something - unacceptable, especially when given the number of times he's come in with more than 8 or 10 overs to go - or at times even 20/30+. Would be good for both teams if they could look at their counterparts - on the Indian front, we certainly need a bit more dynamic thought and a willingness to drop players or move people around - and I'm sure most Pakistanis would want a bit more consistency in the team selection.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 9th April 2005, 21:35
Sage's Avatar
Sage Sage is offline
First Class Captain
 
Debut: Nov 2000
Venue: USA
Runs: 4,982
Opening with Afridi was a mistake, just like I said before the game. Afridi and Kamran should switch positions, and then the team is perfectly balanced.

I don't understand why Kaif is stuffed down the order, when he can't slog and is better suited to the middle order, like Younis Khan. He would be better suited at 4, Yuvraj or Mongia should be at 7.

Chopping and changing are Pakistani cricket traits, but they were expected after the two losses.

There does need to a compromise between the two extremes, but I have a feeling Pakistan has found the right mix and order. India has done well to drop Laxman, but its biggest problem is the captain, once one of the premier ODI batsmen in the world. At least Sachin can bowl well during his lean run, why can't Ganguly do the same?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 9th April 2005, 21:49
Team Slayer Team Slayer is offline
First Class Star
 
Debut: Jan 2005
Runs: 3,460
good point OTW. For Pakistan, I think Shahid and Kamran need to be switched, and that's it. The balance otherwise is fine.

For India, I really think Gangs should "rest" himself for the next game. Sehwag and Dhoni should open, Kaif should play 3, Dravid 4, Sachin 5, Yuvraj 6, Mongia 7...and then 4 bowlers.
__________________
And those who have no knowledge say: "Why does not Allah speak to us (face to face) or why does not a sign come to us?" So, said the people before them words of a similar nature. (Because) their hearts are alike.

We have indeed made clear the signs for people who believe with certainty.

[The Glorious Quran, AlBaqarah:118]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 9th April 2005, 22:05
Civil's Avatar
Civil Civil is offline
Tape Ball Star
 
Debut: Jan 2005
Runs: 1,201
agree with TS

btw how you posting bhai dont you got a 134 exam or something to study for . LOL
__________________
"The ink of the scholar is more holy than the blood of the martyr"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 9th April 2005, 22:10
Team Slayer Team Slayer is offline
First Class Star
 
Debut: Jan 2005
Runs: 3,460
Civil, I was done 134 in 1B

first exam is this Friday
__________________
And those who have no knowledge say: "Why does not Allah speak to us (face to face) or why does not a sign come to us?" So, said the people before them words of a similar nature. (Because) their hearts are alike.

We have indeed made clear the signs for people who believe with certainty.

[The Glorious Quran, AlBaqarah:118]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 9th April 2005, 22:28
Guest
 
Runs: n/a
moderation is definitely needed from both sides. however, when looking at batting order, it is important to differentiate between the first and second innings. I think Pakistan has had a fairly consistent batting lineup batting first and have changed it around a bit batting second. the situation of the match certainly has an impact on the batting order for the team batting second.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10th April 2005, 06:56
Officer Barbrady Officer Barbrady is offline
ODI Debutant
 
Debut: Mar 2003
Runs: 12,485
Pakistan's chopping with the top order leaves a lot to be desired. But it is also easier to drop players like Butt, Taufeeq, Hameed etc who are still finding their feet in international cricket. In India's case, dropping Ganguly, Laxman or even Yuvraj and Kaif is much more difficult give that they are established players with 'hero' status (whereas Ghambir or Chopra won't be a problem). For example even if someone like Razzak has a very lean period it will be very difficult to drop him from the odi side given his past record. Mo Sami has never been dropped since WC 03 whether he has performed or not.

The key to success (in ODI's) for Pakistan has been the ability of players like Razzak, Afridi (Akram and Moin in the past) to come in low down in the order and blaze away. That is why we have scored more than anyone else in the last 10 overs of ODIs.

Kaif, batting at seven, doesn't serve much purpose unless in special situations where he can be handy. Usually at that stage, the match is either almost lost or very quick runs are needed (for which Kaif is not exactly suited). Thus his use as a 'correct' specialist batsman is limited down the order and doesn't get full value for the team. I guess Kaif is the only specialist batsman in the world who bats at 7 (clarke does at times but he is a big hitter as well)? Similarly if Younis Khan is asked to bat at 7 (as happened yesterday) he really won't serve much purpose.

What India needs is a hard-hitting all-rounder who can bat at 7 and come in and blaze away when needed.

I also think 1) Sehwag, 2) Tendu, 3) Dhoni (give him a good run), 4) Dravid should be the top order and in that sequence. They should be followed by two out of Kaif/Yuvrag/Ganguly/MrXYZ with someone from domestic cricket who can hit out (all-rounder) at 7. Yes, as you said, some one has to get dropped and changes should be made!

Perhaps Ganguly should focus on one form of the game?
__________________


The bug at the beach reported a possible breach at the beach. Come armed with shoes and a hunting crop.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10th April 2005, 07:34
badxhah's Avatar
badxhah badxhah is offline
First Class Player
 
Debut: Jan 2005
Venue: Apt#0-3 Lane 39-6 341Victorius Plaza
Runs: 2,820
I think it was Imran Khan who made a valid point that if Dravid is your key player he should come out at #3.Rather than comming after GAGGIES NOODLES.
__________________
«bad[ж]³hah» "0-3 ..39-6 to 341 runs victory.Mother of All Comebacks..«bad[ж]³hah»
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10th April 2005, 14:26
Schiller Schiller is offline
Test Match Debutant
 
Debut: Jan 2005
Venue: Do I?
Runs: 15,912
i think marooned's post sums it up quite well

kaif i feel is wasted down the order, if anything id swap dhoni with kaif
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10th April 2005, 14:31
Officer Barbrady Officer Barbrady is offline
ODI Debutant
 
Debut: Mar 2003
Runs: 12,485
After watching DM's Tendulkar clips just now I have to add he is not *that* Tendulkar anymore.
__________________


The bug at the beach reported a possible breach at the beach. Come armed with shoes and a hunting crop.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10th April 2005, 16:24
Sami for Captain Sami for Captain is offline
Junior Player
 
Debut: Apr 2005
Runs: 243
i dont care about what se;ection tactic we employ. as long as we win, thats what mattters. in odi, its all about HOW THE PLAYERS TAHT ARE CHOSEN PERFORM and not how they are instructed to play
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:24.



Powered by: vBulletin and VBAdvanced CMPS
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PakPassion™ © copyright 2013 All Rights Reserved. Content on PakPassion™ requires permission for reprint.
One of the largest message boards on the web !