HASH - any positives now??

[hasbeen]

I admire hash's argument skills and his optimism but even he should find no positives from todays gutless performance. the only positive i can see is inzi and woolmer should resign and a new setup should be made starting from domestic setup through to new blood in the team.

in fact hash you should stand up today and actually be realistic rather than optimistic that pakistan are a unorganised indisiplined bunch of jokers. they will never win a tournament the way they are setup at the moment. no care for fitness levels and no hunger for success.

[OZGOD]

I think there is a positive. This might act as a catalyst to stimulate some genuine paradigm shifts within your cricketing organisation. The same happened to Australian sport after we failed to win a single medal in the Montreal Olympics in 1976. It forced a complete overhaul of our sporting structure and the creation of the Aust Institute of Sport, and we've been reaping the benefits since.

[hasbeen]

Originally Posted by OZGOD I think there is a positive. This might act as a catalyst to stimulate some genuine paradigm shifts within your cricketing organisation. The same happened to Australian sport after we failed to win a single medal in the Montreal Olympics in 1976. It forced a complete overhaul of our sporting structure and the creation of the Aust Institute of Sport, and we've been reaping the benefits since.

we can only hope. australians are more professional thgh

[SUPERSAMI]

Originally Posted by OZGOD I think there is a positive. This might act as a catalyst to stimulate some genuine paradigm shifts within your cricketing organisation. The same happened to Australian sport after we failed to win a single medal in the Montreal Olympics in 1976. It forced a complete overhaul of our sporting structure and the creation of the Aust Institute of Sport, and we've been reaping the benefits since.

That only happen when an organization takes an objective look at it self and thinks of the greater good, with Pak there is a history of finger pointing and scapegoat hunting.

[UJ]

Originally Posted by OZGOD I think there is a positive. This might act as a catalyst to stimulate some genuine paradigm shifts within your cricketing organisation. The same happened to Australian sport after we failed to win a single medal in the Montreal Olympics in 1976. It forced a complete overhaul of our sporting structure and the creation of the Aust Institute of Sport, and we've been reaping the benefits since.

The 2003 WC should have triggered the paradigm shift and thats what we were all saying back then....but it never happened did it? Lets see what happens this time around....

[OZGOD]

Originally Posted by UJ The 2003 WC should have triggered the paradigm shift and thats what we were all saying back then....but it never happened did it? Lets see what happens this time around....

You didn't lose to a minnow in 2003 though, you had to play OZ and India.

[feather]

So we lost big deal. Cricket is sport and things such as this happen. We live n learn...few heads will roll including that of Inzi and for years to come we'll cry out for Inzi cause I can't see any replacement for him.

YK will be a joke of a captain. This man would not make my ODI team. Hopefully we will find a complete new pair of openers perhaps little more solid. I would blame the loss on our openers and YK for the most part. MoYo and Inzi should have played better.

[Oxy]

Yes Hash - dont hide. Answer the question. Or are you stocking up on 'optimistic juice'???