Englang's Bad Luck

[shahidrazzaq]

Rain washes out England's hopes

Cricinfo staff

May 21, 2007

West Indies 437 and 89 for 0 (Gayle 47*, Ganga 30*) drew with England 553 for 5 dec and 284 for 8 dec


A mere 20 overs were possible on the final day at Lord's as West Indies and England were frustrated by a depressing combination of drizzle and murky light, leaving the series wide open with three Tests to play.


The match was nicely poised, if slightly balanced in England's favour, with West Indies in pursuit of an unlikely 401 to win with ten wickets in hand. Chris Gayle, the one West Indian with sufficient gumption and class to tackle such a Himalayan task, began the day with two crunching boundaries off Steve Harmison and Liam Plunkett. England's opening bowlers were a little better than in the first innings but once again consistently wide; Gayle and Daren Ganga were simply not made to play enough, and the rain forced the players off after just 35 minutes to further reduce England's chances of forcing a victory.

At 3.30pm, the players were brought back on, though conditions were far from comfortable and the light ominously dark. They stayed out there long enough for Ganga to cut his way to 2000 Test runs, while Gayle stood tall to drive Plunkett straight back past him, bringing up the pair's 50 partnership from 74 balls. Yet again, the light deteriorated quickly and the players took an early tea.

Though the rain relented, the light failed to improve sufficiently and, at 5.50pm, play was abandoned. The series is now fascinatingly poised and West Indies can be proud of a fighting, gutsy display in the first Test - from their batsmen, if not so much from their weak bowling attack. After England declared on a mammoth 553 for 5 the fear was that Brian Lara's absence might leave West Indies short of runs. But they fought impressively and, led by Shivnarine Chanderpaul's dogged 74, restricted England's lead to something vaguely manageable. Their bowling remains a concern.

All square for Headingley, then, but England have much to ponder too, not least what side to pick. Both Andrew Flintoff and the captain, Michael Vaughan, missed the Test at Lord's and there are doubts that Matthew Hoggard - who picked up a thigh injury on the second day - will be fit for Friday. Peter Moores' reign has begun in solid style, but the hard work begins now.

© Cricinfo

[Officer Barbrady]

England cannot beat the best as long as they have Cook, Wood and Bell all playing in the same lineup.

Shah's one shot had some promise at least. He probably needed a longer run. And so did Bopara's 3 shots in an ODI.

The quicker they get to this second string through injuries or form, the better for England.

[sohaib17]

yeh agree Englands WC team was far better then Current team


players like Nixon Bopara etc really showed england is a fighter which i can not see in players like COOK , BELL etc cause they only play for themselve

[shahidrazzaq]

They're WC Team beat WI in their home ground.
Why can't they beat WI even better in Tests?

[Bobaran]

Bad luck? It looks like WI were going to win if they kept it up.

[James]

We weren't unlucky. We had a 3 man attack, and it wasnt even good. If we had played 98 overs we might have lost! A draw was a fair result in this game.