User Name Password
Go Back   PakPassion - Pakistan Cricket Forum > Sport > Cricket


Share This Forum!  
 
 
     
 
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 30th January 2005, 12:41
Guest
 
Runs: n/a
The difference today for Team Pakistan

Question on 2004-08-29 2141:
Hi Bob. I am gutted that Pakistan lost. I do believe that it proves my point yet again. "Utility" as u call them or "bits and
pieces" players will get you so far but they wont quite finish the job. To me, Pakistan were a bowler short and a batsman short.
Malik went for one bad over which probably proved crucial in the end, thats the difference between a malik and a saqlain, a kaneria
even an arshad khan! the three S's bowled well as did Afridi I must say. Bob, I feel that Pakistan need a finisher. Not Razzaq who
can blast 30 off 20 at the end, I mean someone who will say "If I am there at the end we will win and I will be there at the end".
SA have Jonty, India have Dravid/Yuvraj/Kaif and Aus had THE finisher Michael Bevan. I also believe that the criticism of the
openers is unjustified. In my view if u have a Nazir or Afridi opening the likelihood is they will get out cheaply and stupidly thus
putting more pressure on the mid order batsmen. Yasir should stay, Farhat maybe is the answer though u are aware of my preference for Nasim Khan. Just to end this, watch out for a young batsman Ashraf Ali who I think plays for Lahore. Sorry to have went on Bob. Good luck for the ICC CT but i have to say that aaj jeetiga! some great pics by
the way from holland from tk! next time u tour england plz come to Ireland (Belfast)

Answer by Bob:
Hi mishra500,
I continue to be amazed that you consider Afridi and Malike to be biots and pieces players! I rate them far better than that. I
agree about the finisher, we will need to address that. I was hoping that YKhan could fulfil that role.
BW Bob

It seems I was wrong about Razzaq but he certainly stepped up to the plate. I have always maintained the Razzaq of old was a world class all rounder. We hopefully will start to see him go back to that form. All credit to Woolmer on this one.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 30th January 2005, 12:42
Amjid Javed's Avatar
Amjid Javed Amjid Javed is offline
PakPassion Living Legend Poster
 
Debut: Mar 2004
Venue: Manchester, UK
Runs: 91,793
YK finisher lol!

bob quit THE BS!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30th January 2005, 12:44
Mercenary Mercenary is offline
Test Match Star
 
Debut: Sep 2003
Runs: 26,324
todays game was even more bits and pieces than usual. We had a part-time wickie!! So much for your theory!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30th January 2005, 12:46
dan hudson dan hudson is offline
Tape Ball Regular
 
Debut: Nov 2003
Venue: Cirencester, Gloucs/Reading, Berks
Runs: 411
The "bits and pieces" players won them the game today whilst Australia's "specialists" (Hogg and Symonds) were just not up to the job.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 30th January 2005, 12:48
razzler's Avatar
razzler razzler is offline
First Class Captain
 
Debut: Mar 2004
Venue: Ottawa but heart in Vancouver
Runs: 5,997
I have told you before and let me see it again that ODI game has changed and one can afford to have players like Razzaq and Afridi.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 30th January 2005, 12:49
Daoud's Avatar
Daoud Daoud is offline
Test Match Debutant
 
Debut: Sep 2003
Venue: Sydney
Runs: 16,627
:oD
Flash in the pan, Dan
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 30th January 2005, 12:49
dan hudson dan hudson is offline
Tape Ball Regular
 
Debut: Nov 2003
Venue: Cirencester, Gloucs/Reading, Berks
Runs: 411
I want to see Gary twist this one round.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 30th January 2005, 12:50
Schiller Schiller is offline
Test Match Debutant
 
Debut: Jan 2005
Venue: Do I?
Runs: 15,912
;-?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 30th January 2005, 12:50
Amjid Javed's Avatar
Amjid Javed Amjid Javed is offline
PakPassion Living Legend Poster
 
Debut: Mar 2004
Venue: Manchester, UK
Runs: 91,793
DAN, Hogg and symonds are bits and pieces players.. do u see them playing tests!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 30th January 2005, 12:50
Guest
 
Runs: n/a
I do not indulge in knee jerk reactions like most Pakistani fans. Abdul Razzaq showed the form today that made him a world class all rounder. That is why Pak won, that and the fact someone decided to finish the game off unlike in the Videocon! Inzi should still come in at 3 and Pak will be a lot better with their pace attack back. Remember its the final that really matters but this is a good win for Pakistan, keeping the proud record at the WACA going. They clearly learnt from the last test they played there which is a very encouraging sign.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 30th January 2005, 12:51
razzler's Avatar
razzler razzler is offline
First Class Captain
 
Debut: Mar 2004
Venue: Ottawa but heart in Vancouver
Runs: 5,997
Pointing even credited them and he said that they are pretty good allrounders to have.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 30th January 2005, 12:53
razzler's Avatar
razzler razzler is offline
First Class Captain
 
Debut: Mar 2004
Venue: Ottawa but heart in Vancouver
Runs: 5,997
Gary its not knee jerk reaction and they are a very valuable part for our ODI team.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 30th January 2005, 12:53
dan hudson dan hudson is offline
Tape Ball Regular
 
Debut: Nov 2003
Venue: Cirencester, Gloucs/Reading, Berks
Runs: 411
Amjid: That's my point mate!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 30th January 2005, 12:54
Guest
 
Runs: n/a
I have never said a genuine all round player should not be in the team! And I always said Pak needed a finisher. I thought it could be Malik, looks like Razzaq has stepped up. Any team with these 2 factors added to a potent bowling attack will be very hard to beat. They just need to sort out the top order.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 30th January 2005, 13:08
Daoud's Avatar
Daoud Daoud is offline
Test Match Debutant
 
Debut: Sep 2003
Venue: Sydney
Runs: 16,627
Why do we need to find a finisher if Razzaq can do the job perfectly. A finisher doesnt have to be in the Jonty Rhodes/Bevan mould. He can also be in the Symonds (when in form) or Clarke mould. In fact, I'd say that if we're batting first, I'd rather have Razzaq at the end than Bevan (chasing is a different scenario, but he did pretty well today)
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 30th January 2005, 13:11
Guest
 
Runs: n/a
I just said Razzaq could be the finisher!
He is in the Bevan mould as he has a cool head, can run quickly when he wants and can take singles as well as hit a long ball! btw, Bevan has a 51 average batting first. Hogg has a good bowling record in odis but I would agree he is only the 3rd best spinner Australia have. Symonds is a pure batsman who has been handy with the ball.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:32.



Powered by: vBulletin and VBAdvanced CMPS
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PakPassion™ © copyright 2013 All Rights Reserved. Content on PakPassion™ requires permission for reprint.
One of the largest message boards on the web !