"Now, we can expect a batsman in this decade to average around 35, at the very least. As a bowler, we can expect him to average around 30. Now, if we play an all rounder, for it to be worth it, he must average at lease 30 with the bat and under 35 with the ball, and this too, is only valid for LOI's, for the more incisive bowler or more prolific batsman should definitely make it in tests, instead of a bits and pieces player. So overall, do you agree with this assessment that all rounders are only worth it if they average at least what is given here?"